CA3: Strip searching an inmate in isolation 3 times a day serves no penological purpose and is enjoined

Strip searching an inmate in isolation three times a day serves no penological purpose and is enjoined. Parkell v. Danberg, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15092 (3d Cir. Aug. 17, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Strip search | Comments Off on CA3: Strip searching an inmate in isolation 3 times a day serves no penological purpose and is enjoined

E.D.Mich.: Gov’t failed to prove nexus to def’s property in SW affidavit, so no PC

The government fails to prove nexus to defendant’s property in a drug search warrant for three addresses. The lack of nexus is a lack of probable cause [and the court doesn’t even discuss good faith exception]. United States v. Harvey, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108198 (E.D.Mich. Aug. 16, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Gov’t failed to prove nexus to def’s property in SW affidavit, so no PC

AJC: Gwinnett police add drone to their investigative arsenal

AJC: Gwinnett police add drone to their investigative arsenal:

The Gwinnett County Police Department has added a drone to its investigative arsenal…. GCPD believes it’s the first law enforcement agency in the state to seek drone approval from the Federal Aviation Administration.

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on AJC: Gwinnett police add drone to their investigative arsenal

N.D.Ala.: Strieff applied to a possibly negligent look through a garage window when OnStar reported location of stolen car

A Cadillac was stolen from a car dealer, and it was tracked by OnStar in the car. Police came to do a knock-and-talk. Two cars were in the carport that weren’t the stolen car. They looked through a window of the garage and saw what matched the stolen car. The OnStar report was an intervening act under Strieff, and the look in the window was at worst negligence the police and there would be no suppression. United States v. Ratcliff, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108240 (N.D.Ala. Aug. 16, 2016).

A prison medical care company laptop was stolen from a car, and inmates sued over the alleged leak of their medical care information. They included a Fourth Amendment claim which hardly applies to employee negligence leading to a theft. All the inmate suits are dismissed as frivolous. Guess v. Cal. Corr. Health Care Servs., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108647 (E.D.Cal. Aug. 16, 2016)*; Sepulveda v. Cal. Corr. Healthcare Servs., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108652 (E.D.Cal. Aug. 16, 2016)*; Monteiro v. Cal. Corr. Healthcare Servs., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108653 (E.D.Cal. Aug. 16, 2016)*; Garza v. Cal. Correcitonal Healthcare Servs., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108665 (E.D.Cal. Aug. 16, 2016).*

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Strieff applied to a possibly negligent look through a garage window when OnStar reported location of stolen car

MA automatic standing only applies to possessory offenses, and it doesn’t apply to defendant’s murder charge

Massachusetts automatic standing only applies to possessory offenses, and it doesn’t apply to defendant’s murder charge. Commonwealth v. Miller, 475 Mass. 212, 2016 Mass. LEXIS 605 (Aug. 17, 2016).

The government showed probable cause for the defendant but the connection to firearms in defendant’s property was tenuous. Indeed, firearms connected with the offense were found already. Nothing showed that defendant had anything at his house, YET, the good faith exception is enough to sustain this search because “the Defendant does not demonstrate evidence that the warrant is so lacking in probable cause that reliance on it is entirely unreasonable” despite the lack of nexus. United States v. Baylor, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105939 (S.D.Iowa Aug. 4, 2016) [and this is a holding worth appealing because the court just isn’t persuasive; lack of nexus is an utter lack of PC].

Posted in Nexus, Standing | Comments Off on MA automatic standing only applies to possessory offenses, and it doesn’t apply to defendant’s murder charge

Morning Consult: Potential FCC Probe of Police Cellphone Trackers Could Serve as Proxy for Congressional Battle

Morning Consult: Potential FCC Probe of Police Cellphone Trackers Could Serve as Proxy for Congressional Battle by Amir Nasr:
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site simulators | Comments Off on Morning Consult: Potential FCC Probe of Police Cellphone Trackers Could Serve as Proxy for Congressional Battle

TX14: Two theories of standing: reasonable-expectation-of-privacy and intrusion-upon-property from Jones

Defendant was found to be a trespasser, a squatter who changed the locks, in the home of another who was in jail. Defendant attempted to show standing in the trial court, but the state did not raise lack of standing until appeal, which the court of appeals permits. Relying on defendant’s record, the court analyzes standing under two theories: reasonable-expectation-of-privacy theory and intrusion-upon-property theory from Jones. Under these facts, they come out the same: defendant has no standing [whereas Jones did]. Williams v. State, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 8854 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Aug. 16, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on TX14: Two theories of standing: reasonable-expectation-of-privacy and intrusion-upon-property from Jones

N.D.N.Y. When def failed to report to parole, his parole didn’t expire and a parole search could still occur

Defendant was delinquent in reporting, and his parole otherwise had expired, but the state parole law considered him still subject to their control for not reporting. Thus, the parole search could occur after the nominal expiration of parole because he hadn’t been discharged. Defendant doesn’t get a hearing because the facts are not in dispute. United States v. Pascual, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107264 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 2016).

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y. When def failed to report to parole, his parole didn’t expire and a parole search could still occur

D.Alaska: Officers obviously had RS

“Under these circumstances, the Court has no difficulty finding that this investigatory stop was supported by particularized and objective facts that support a reasonable suspicion that Gruben and his associates recently had engaged in unlawful drug related activity.” United States v. Gruben, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105001 (D.Alaska June 10, 2016)*:
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Officers obviously had RS

Atlantic: Police Can Use a Legal Grey Area to Rob Anyone of Their Belongings

Atlantic: Police Can Use a Legal Grey Area to Rob Anyone of Their Belongings by Kaveh Waddell:

When officers categorize wallets or cellphones as evidence, getting them back can be nearly impossible—even if the owner isn’t charged with a crime.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Atlantic: Police Can Use a Legal Grey Area to Rob Anyone of Their Belongings

WSJ Blog: Professor Says Police Bodycam Study Suffers from ‘Fatal Flaw’

WSJ Blog: Professor Says Police Bodycam Study Suffers from ‘Fatal Flaw’ by Jacob Gershman:

Law Blog last week reported on a provocative new study by Temple University researchers suggesting that police officers wearing body cameras are more likely to use lethal force. Its conclusions are catching flak from a policing researcher at Arizona State University’s School of Criminology and Criminal Justice who thinks the data used in the study suffers from ‘a fatal flaw.’

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on WSJ Blog: Professor Says Police Bodycam Study Suffers from ‘Fatal Flaw’

OH1: Probation search of room apparently common to all tenants was permissible

Defendant was a probationer subject to a search condition. It was reasonable for the officer to consider the living room area common to all the residents in the property. It was also permissible for him to stick his head into a bedroom to look, and drugs seen in plain view could be seized. State v. Nelson, 2016-Ohio-5344, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 3213 (1st Dist. Aug. 12, 2016).

The court first held that the motion to suppress was properly denied as too generic and not pleading issues to be decided. It then held defendant had no standing to challenge the search of the property where the meth operation was found because it wasn’t his place and he disassociated himself from it. State v. Hewitt, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 3235 (5th Dist. Aug. 9, 2016).*

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on OH1: Probation search of room apparently common to all tenants was permissible

W.D.Va.: A completed crime doesn’t preclude a Terry stop on reasonable suspicion

A completed crime doesn’t preclude a Terry stop on reasonable suspicion. Besides that, the court finds probable cause. United States v. Truth, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106651 (W.D.Va. Aug. 11, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: A completed crime doesn’t preclude a Terry stop on reasonable suspicion

TN: Not IAC to not object to def’s consent to statement and DNA sample

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not moving to suppress defendant’s volunteering to talk to police and give a DNA sample. It was clearly consensual. Jones v. State, 2016 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 595 (Aug. 11, 2016).*

The plaintiffs’ family ran a furniture store. Suspecting a late night break-in, two go to the scene heavily armed while one calls 911 without telling the police the others were going to be there. This leads to a heated confrontation between innocent family members and the police: arrests and allegations of excessive force. Summary judgment is granted as to one officer and denied as to others based on the allegations of the complaint and the summary judgment papers that the law was clearly established as to practically everything at issue. Crawford v. Geiger, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14898 (6th Cir. Aug. 11, 2016).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on TN: Not IAC to not object to def’s consent to statement and DNA sample

D.C.Cir.: Govt waived standing by not presenting issue to Dist.Ct.

The government waived defendant’s lack of standing by not arguing it in the district court. The faint smell of marijuana and multiple air fresheners was probable cause to search. United States v. Sheffield, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14826 (D.C.Cir. Aug. 12, 2016).

Plaintiffs were walking on a street closed for a neighborhood fair toward and mere feet from their home when the defendant off duty officer yelled at them to get off the street. They were walking home anyway. Nevertheless, the officer chased them into their garage and chased one plaintiff into the house to arrest them for disobeying a police officer when (a) they didn’t and (b) he didn’t identify himself as a police officer. Summary judgment properly denied because plaintiffs alleged violations of clearly established rights. Carr v. Cadeau, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14615 (11th Cir. Aug. 9, 2016).*

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Qualified immunity, Standards of review, Standing | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Govt waived standing by not presenting issue to Dist.Ct.

VI: No REP in a bag on ground outside an apt building

Defendant’s apartment was subjected to a search warrant, and defendant argued that a Crown Royal bag outside on the ground was outside the scope of the warrant and couldn’t be seized. The court applies Dunn and the curtilage analysis to find that it wasn’t curtilage because of the “sheer number of people” who could walk by there, and there wasn’t a reasonable expectation of privacy in that place. People v. George, 2016 V.I. LEXIS 103 (Super. Ct. Aug. 5, 2016).*

Defendant was the target of a sex trafficking investigation in Wasilla AK, and the information came in over three months and was corroborated by text messages and listening to telephone calls in the two weeks prior to the warrant’s issuance. The offense was ongoing, and the warrant was not constitutionally stale by the time it was issued. There was also a Franks challenge rejected as immaterial to the finding of probable cause. United States v. Keehn, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105003 (D.Alaska May 23, 2016).*

Posted in Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on VI: No REP in a bag on ground outside an apt building

ME: Great detail supported the CI’s statement; inclusion of CI’s criminal history didn’t undermine PC

The great detail about the CI with its corroboration was probable cause. The inclusion of the CI’s criminal history doesn’t ipso facto undermine the probable cause, and the reviewing court is obliged to give deference to the issuing court’s probable cause finding. State v. Arbour, 2016 ME 126, 2016 Me. LEXIS 141 (Aug. 11, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on ME: Great detail supported the CI’s statement; inclusion of CI’s criminal history didn’t undermine PC

OR: Going into pocket after patdown unreasonable; no articulation of anything being a weapon

Defendant consented to a patdown, and the officer exceeded the scope of the patdown by going into the pocket. He felt something, but he didn’t articulate that it could be a weapon. The officer’s general observations about drug dealers didn’t support an officer safety risk. State v. Musalf, 280 Ore. App. 142, 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 968 (Aug. 3, 2016).

There was reasonable suspicion to stop defendant’s vehicle for matching the description of the vehicle involved in a robbery in a 911 call seen two minutes later within blocks of the robbery. United States v. Daniel, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104159 (E.D.Mo. July 7, 2016),* adopted, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96481 (E.D. Mo., July 25, 2016).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OR: Going into pocket after patdown unreasonable; no articulation of anything being a weapon

S.D.N.Y.: Child porn SW affidavit doesn’t need pictures attached: a description will do

The description “child pornography” is enough for the affidavit for a CP search warrant–the pictures themselves don’t have to be attached to prove it. United States v. Weatherman, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104878 (S.D. N.Y. Aug. 9, 2016).

Based on the video and the speed of the officer driving up on defendant at 115 mph, the court just can’t conclude there was a reasonable suspicion that defendant was following too close when he pulled in behind a truck way ahead of the officer. United States v. Ramos, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104581 (N.D.Tex. Aug. 9, 2016).*

The informant’s information came in for a month and it gave probable cause for defendant’s stop under Gates. United States v. Broadhurst, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104502 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2016).*

Posted in Burden of proof, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Child porn SW affidavit doesn’t need pictures attached: a description will do

N.D.Ill.: Defense counsel was ineffective for not seeing def’s guest standing in girlfriend’s apartment

Defendant established a failure of performance of defense counsel in his 2255 for not filing a motion to suppress on guest standing. He didn’t file a motion to suppress solely because defendant said he didn’t “live at” his girlfriend’s place, but the proof would have shown, if he inquired, that defendant would likely have guest standing. This was objectively unreasonable performance. Another hearing will be set to determine Strickland prejudice to the defendant. United States v. Edmond, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103738 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 7, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Defense counsel was ineffective for not seeing def’s guest standing in girlfriend’s apartment