OH8: Plain view of hit and run vehicle in driveway justified officers’ entry onto curtilage

Defendant raises his search claim via an ineffective assistance of counsel claim: defense counsel should have suppressed the plain view of his vehicle in his driveway partly covered by a blanket. Officers responded to an anonymous tip that defendant’s SUV was involved in a hit and run that killed two pedestrians in Cleveland. There was video from a bus that caught the hit and run. Defendant’s vehicle matched the vehicle described by witnesses and in the video. The officers’ entry on to his curtilage was reasonable. While the front of the vehicle was partially covered by a blanket, the broken windshield was in plain view in the driveway and from the street. Collins v. Virginia is distinguishable. State v. Kinney, 2019-Ohio-629, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 665 (8th Dist. Feb. 22, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on OH8: Plain view of hit and run vehicle in driveway justified officers’ entry onto curtilage

TN: CI’s drug information about def’s house “within previous 72 hours” not stale

A CI who’d been in defendant’s house reported that defendant had a quantity of marijuana for sale, and it was reported by the officer in the affidavit to have been within the previous 72 hours. Probable cause was shown for the search warrant. Defendant’s attempt to show a false statement by the officer in the affidavit fails. State v. Boykin, 2019 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 124 (Feb. 22, 2019).*

As to the home, “The district court did not err in denying the motion to suppress because the affidavit supporting the search warrant contained ample evidence to find probable cause to support the warrant.” As to his storage locker, “Even omitting evidence of the dog alert, the affidavit supporting the search warrant contained adequate facts to support a finding of probable cause. … Surveillance showed Flowers frequently accessing the lockers for short periods. Earlier, officers found handguns, cocaine and a significant amount of currency in Flowers’s home. The totality of these facts, taken together, establish a reasonable probability that evidence of a crime would be found in the storage locker.” United States v. Flowers, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 5035 (9th Cir. Feb. 21, 2019).*

Posted in Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on TN: CI’s drug information about def’s house “within previous 72 hours” not stale

E.D.Tenn.: Confronting possible trespassers in a house and asking for IDs was reasonable

The officer here confronted trespassers which he suspected might be squatters and drug users. “The Court finds that the officer’s questions and actions were reasonably related to learning the identities of the people on the property, learning whether they were trespassing, and then investigating whether the Defendant was a felon in possession of firearms. Once the officers searched the car, locating guns and ammunition; confirmed the car belonged to the Defendant; and confirmed that the Defendant was a convicted felon, they had probable cause to arrest him. The Court finds the scope of the investigatory stop was proper.” United States v. Smith, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27739 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 21, 2019).*

The seizure of cash off plaintiff and transfer to the DEA was in accord with policy and before he objected to anything. Therefore, it did not deny due process. Chunn v. Amtrak, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 5090 (2d Cir. Feb. 21, 2019).*

Posted in Forfeiture, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Confronting possible trespassers in a house and asking for IDs was reasonable

IN: Walk through of house for non-investigatory reason after unconscious person taken to hospital justified by community caretaking function

Officers responded to a 911 call that a child was unconscious. After the child went to the hospital and the parent went in police vehicle, an officer at the scene did a walk through to insure there was no one else or animals left there and then secure the house. Blood spots were seen. Before the officer could leave, he received a call the child had died. He secured the house for a search warrant. The warrantless walk through and observations were valid based on the community caretaking function. Price v. State, 2019 Ind. App. LEXIS 82 (Feb. 22, 2019).
Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function | Comments Off on IN: Walk through of house for non-investigatory reason after unconscious person taken to hospital justified by community caretaking function

N.D.Cal.: GFE doesn’t apply to protective sweeps which must be objectively reasonable

The good faith exception cannot be applied to an overbroad protective sweep. [Yet, the court finds the exclusionary rule doesn’t apply for other reasons.] United States v. Garcia, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27861 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: GFE doesn’t apply to protective sweeps which must be objectively reasonable

Article: Fourth Amendment Standing and the General Rule of Waiver

Fourth Amendment Standing and the General Rule of Waiver by Katerina Kokkas, 2018 U. Chi. Law Forum art. 14 (2019)

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on Article: Fourth Amendment Standing and the General Rule of Waiver

Journal Times editorial (Mulwaukee): The Cellebrite and its threat to your constitutional rights

Journal Times editorial (Mulwaukee): The Cellebrite and its threat to your constitutional rights. Racine WI acquires a Cellebrite.

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Journal Times editorial (Mulwaukee): The Cellebrite and its threat to your constitutional rights

D.Neb.: ATF administrative inspection can occur even though they had PC; SW not required

Just because ATF had reasonable cause doesn’t mean that they needed a search warrant to conduct an administrative inspection of a gun dealer’s records. United States v. Melton, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 221663 (D. Neb. Dec. 28, 2018):
Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on D.Neb.: ATF administrative inspection can occur even though they had PC; SW not required

CA11: Occasional visitor at house had no standing

“Here, Rodriguez’s limited relationship to Weeks’s house does not grant him a reasonable expectation of privacy in it. Rodriguez testified at the suppression hearing that he went to Weeks’s house after being invited, not on his own accord. He also testified that he did not keep personal items at the home, have keys to it, or exercise control over who was present in the home. Nor had he ever removed anyone from the home, locked any doors, or slept overnight at the home. He claimed that he had been present at the home on five to eight occasions.” He claimed he brought pants to be hemmed, but the USMJ found that not credible since no pants were there. United States v. Rodriguez, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 5015 (11th Cir. Feb. 21, 2019).*

Year old information that child pornography might be found on defendant’s cell phone wasn’t stale. United States v. Ruelas, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 5177 (5th Cir. Feb. 22, 2019).*

Posted in Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Occasional visitor at house had no standing

CA6: State SW can be used to bring a federal prosection

A state search warrant, of course, can be used to initiate a federal prosecution. Dismissal of the state case in favor of federal prosecution is not res judicata. Moreover, the federal government isn’t a party in the state case. United States v. Myles, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 5199 (6th Cir. Feb. 22, 2019).

There was probable cause for defendant’s arrest based on collective knowledge. One officer watched an apparent hand to hand drug sale with binoculars, and defendant had a gun. United States v. Gilbert, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27157 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 21, 2019).*

Defendant disavowed the evidence seized at the time, and he thus lacks standing to contest the search. Even if he did, the search was with probable cause. United States v. Bullock, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28290 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 22, 2019).*

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: State SW can be used to bring a federal prosection

DE: A probation search that didn’t comply with the probation laws couldn’t be used in a criminal proceeding

A probation search that didn’t comply with the probation laws couldn’t be used in a criminal proceeding. Walker v. State, 2019 Del. LEXIS 88 (Feb. 21, 2019).

The record doesn’t show that defendant’s plea was conditional, so there is no preservation for the appeal. State v. Abuhamda, 2019 ND 44, 2019 N.D. LEXIS 38 (Feb. 21, 2019).*

In an implied consent case, the court remands for additional findings on whether consent was voluntary. State v. Vetter, 2019 ND 43, 2019 N.D. LEXIS 45 (Feb. 21, 2019).*

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on DE: A probation search that didn’t comply with the probation laws couldn’t be used in a criminal proceeding

CA4: Seizure of Nazi materials in a SW for an ISIL suspect was reasonable because both are defined as terrorist organizations

Defendant was alleged to be connected to ISIL, and, in a terrorism investigation, the government executed a search warrant at his home. Seizure of Nazi materials wasn’t outside the scope of the search warrant: “a reasonable officer would be able to draw on common knowledge to conclude that the Nazis’ threats and use of violence as a means of achieving their political ends meant that Nazis engaged in terroristic activity ….” United States v. Young, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 4998 (4th Cir. Feb. 21, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Overseizure | Comments Off on CA4: Seizure of Nazi materials in a SW for an ISIL suspect was reasonable because both are defined as terrorist organizations

NY: No REP or 4A right against recording of calls from prison

No Fourth Amendment right of defendant was violated by recording his prison calls and then admitting them into evidence. He was well on notice that they were recorded. People v. Diaz, 2019 NY Slip Op 01260, 2019 N.Y. LEXIS 266 (Feb. 21, 2019).

On a 2255 COA application, petitioner fails to show that defense counsel was ineffective for not raising a Franks issue for which he makes no offer of proof that shows it would succeed. Fields v. United States, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 5206 (11th Cir. Feb. 22, 2019).*

Defendant wasn’t entitled to a Franks hearing because of his failure to make his required substantial preliminary showing of the knowing or reckless false statement. People v. Bellinger, 2019 NY Slip Op 01315, 2019 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1285 (1st Dept. Feb. 21, 2019).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NY: No REP or 4A right against recording of calls from prison

N.D.Ill.: Despite McDonald under the 2A, apparent possession of a weapon after hearing shots fired can be considered as RS

Defendant asserted that he had a Second Amendment right to possess a handgun, and that the court could not consider that in assessing reasonable suspicion. The court disagrees because here the officers were responding to hearing shots fired and saw defendant possessing something that reasonably could be concluded was a firearm moments after the shots were fired. United States v. Crockett, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26193 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Despite McDonald under the 2A, apparent possession of a weapon after hearing shots fired can be considered as RS

D.Minn.: Exigent cell phone ping not barred by Carpenter

An exigent circumstances cell phone ping was not prohibited by Carpenter. United States v. Andrews, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26283 (D. Minn. Feb. 20, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Exigent cell phone ping not barred by Carpenter

DE: No error in order denying production of a DNA warrant in an unrelated case without showing any relevance

There was no abuse of discretion in the trial court refusing to make the state produce a DNA affidavit and search warrant in another case not shown to be relevant here. White v. StateWhite v. StateWhite v. State, 2019 Del. LEXIS 85 (Feb. 20, 2019).

There was [plenty of] probable cause for defendant’s stop and arrest for bank robbery based on witness statements, showing them photographs, an already outstanding arrest warrant for something else. United States v. Fowler, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26373 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 20, 2019).*

Posted in DNA, Probable cause | Comments Off on DE: No error in order denying production of a DNA warrant in an unrelated case without showing any relevance

S.D.N.Y.: Overseizure from iCloud account wasn’t so flagrant it required suppression; govt agreed in advance to exclude the overseized

The government’s overseizure from defendant’s iCloud account wasn’t so flagrant or egregious to warrant suppression. The government agreed up-front to exclude the obvious, and that’s a sufficient remedy. United States v. Pinto-Thomaz, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26262 (S.D. N.Y. Feb. 20, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overseizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Overseizure from iCloud account wasn’t so flagrant it required suppression; govt agreed in advance to exclude the overseized

Darwin Award nominee

Facebook posts eight days after a home invasion robbery show the defendants wearing the victims’ stolen Rolex and other jewelry including a unique gold coin necklace and handling the guns used in the robbery. The videos were not more prejudicial than relevant. Jarvis v. State, 2019 Miss. App. LEXIS 72 (Feb. 19, 2019).

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Darwin Award nominee

TX13: Unsatisified state requirement issuing magistrate’s name be clearly stated warranted suppression

Texas added a fifth requirement to search warrants that the issuing magistrate’s name be clearly legible. It can be incorporated from the affidavit. Here it wasn’t, and the motion to suppress was properly granted and no good faith exception applies. State v. Arellano, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 1223 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi – Edinburg Feb. 21, 2019).

One officer saw what he believed was a hand-to-hand drug transaction, and he passed it on to another officer. That satisfied the collective knowledge doctrine. State v. Preston, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 67 (Feb. 19, 2019).*

Posted in Collective knowledge, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX13: Unsatisified state requirement issuing magistrate’s name be clearly stated warranted suppression

NM: Reserve deputy’s stop of suspected DUI to call for a deputy was a reasonable minor intrusion

A reserve deputy followed defendant who was driving badly and then she ran into a car in her driveway. He stopped behind her and told her to “hang tight,” and he called for a deputy. The stop was reasonable, considering it was a minor intrusion on defendant’s rights. State v. Wright, 2019 N.M. App. LEXIS 7 (Feb. 14, 2019):
Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NM: Reserve deputy’s stop of suspected DUI to call for a deputy was a reasonable minor intrusion