Daily Archives: March 28, 2026

CA6: Occasionally spending the night at the place searched doesn’t give standing

Occasionally spending the night at the place searched doesn’t give standing. United States v. Carney, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 8792 (6th Cir. Mar. 24, 2026). There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s frisk, and the gun found is suppressed. United … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Occasionally spending the night at the place searched doesn’t give standing

OR: A year of public internet portal monitoring required a warrant under OR Const.

A year of monitoring of internet use at a public portal where the company providing the portal cooperated with the police was state action. “[T]he state’s year-long surveillance of defendant’s internet activities was a search under Article I, section 9.” … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Search | Comments Off on OR: A year of public internet portal monitoring required a warrant under OR Const.

E.D.Va.: Military search authorization was sufficiently particular for use in federal court

The military search authorization here was sufficiently particular and works in federal court. United States v. Guinsler, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63922 (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2026). (§ 52.39 n.3). The state stipulated to a false fact in the search … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Military searches, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Military search authorization was sufficiently particular for use in federal court

OH8: Smell of MJ in car alone no longer PC

The smell of marijuana in a car alone isn’t probable cause in Ohio anymore because of legalization, quoting State v. Gray, 2025-Ohio-4607, ¶ 61 (1st Dist. Oct. 3, 2025). State v. Tucker, 2026-Ohio-1045 (8th Dist. Mar. 26, 2026). Challenging only … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH8: Smell of MJ in car alone no longer PC

ID: POs may do protective sweeps of a house same any other officer

“Having considered the rationale justifying protective sweeps, we hold, as a matter of first impression, that probation officers conducting lawful compliance checks in a residence may conduct a protective sweep to the same extent and are subject to the same … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on ID: POs may do protective sweeps of a house same any other officer

ID: Inevitable discovery doesn’t always require independent investigation

“[W]e hold that a finding that there was a lawful separate or independent investigation underway is not a per se requirement in every case for the inevitable discovery doctrine to apply. While a separate, untainted investigation may be the simplest … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Probable cause | Comments Off on ID: Inevitable discovery doesn’t always require independent investigation