Daily Archives: March 4, 2026

S.D.Miss.: Evanescent nature of evidence of sex crime justified warrantless entry to hotel room

A rape report and the potential evanescent nature of the evidence justified a warrantless entry into defendant’s hotel room. He also was on probation. United States v. Jones, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43102 (S.D. Miss. Mar. 3, 2026):

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: Evanescent nature of evidence of sex crime justified warrantless entry to hotel room

404 Media: CBP Tapped Into the Online Advertising Ecosystem To Track Peoples’ Movements

404 Media: CBP Tapped Into the Online Advertising Ecosystem To Track Peoples’ Movements by Joseph Cox (“An internal DHS document obtained by 404 Media shows for the first time CBP used location data sourced from the online advertising industry to … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on 404 Media: CBP Tapped Into the Online Advertising Ecosystem To Track Peoples’ Movements

TN: Failure to allege what should have been suppressed defeats IAC claim

Failure to allege what should have been suppressed if a motion to suppress had been filed is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Coyne v. State, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 104 (Mar. 3, 2026). Qualified immunity denied: … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Failure to allege what should have been suppressed defeats IAC claim

CA4: Error to deny suppression motion without hearing where there’s disputed facts

The district court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress without a hearing when there were disputed facts. United States v. Moore, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6196 (4th Cir. Mar. 3, 2026). Defendant consented orally and in writing to search … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Issue preclusion, Nexus, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA4: Error to deny suppression motion without hearing where there’s disputed facts

W.D.Pa.: Younger doctrine didn’t apply when plaintiff’s criminal case was over

Younger doctrine didn’t apply when plaintiff’s criminal case was over. Harris v. Trent, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42416 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2026). “Here, assuming the factual disputes in Franke’s favor, the relevant question is whether it was clearly established … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Younger doctrine didn’t apply when plaintiff’s criminal case was over