E.D.Va.: Military search authorization was sufficiently particular for use in federal court

The military search authorization here was sufficiently particular and works in federal court. United States v. Guinsler, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63922 (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2026). (§ 52.39 n.3).

The state stipulated to a false fact in the search warrant affidavit, but the court finds that it isn’t material. State v. Brown, 2026 S.C. App. LEXIS 29 (Mar. 25, 2026).*

Defendant didn’t show he had enough connection to this rented car to have standing. United States v. Ilori, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 8818 (2d Cir. Mar. 26, 2026).*

A mental health commitment has to be based on probable cause and it also implicates the due process clause. This was on probable cause. Andrews v. N.Y.C. Health, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64196 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 6, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Military searches, Probable cause, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.