Daily Archives: March 10, 2026

CA4: Surveillance video of def carrying suitcase showed his standing in it

Surveillance footage showed defendant carrying his suitcase, and that shows he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in it under Bond. United States v. Garcia, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6876 (4th Cir. Mar. 5, 2026). Consent was to look inside … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA4: Surveillance video of def carrying suitcase showed his standing in it

ID: AW for suspected passenger allowed police to enter curtilage to look in parked car at night

Officers could enter defendant’s curtilage to look in his just parked car at night. They had an arrest warrant for a suspected passenger and they couldn’t tell whether she was in the car before it was parked under Payton. State … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Pretext, Reasonableness | Comments Off on ID: AW for suspected passenger allowed police to enter curtilage to look in parked car at night

CO: Vague description in arrest warrant didn’t justify def’s stop

The description of an arrestee as a 30ish male with the last name starting in “Mc” didn’t justify defendant’s detention in a park. People v. McGee, 2026 CO 14 (Mar. 9, 2026):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Particularity | Comments Off on CO: Vague description in arrest warrant didn’t justify def’s stop

NY3: Housing law that requires landlords to submit to premises and records searches is unconstitutional

Section 8 housing law that requires landlords to submit to premises and records searches is unconstitutional. Matter of People of the State of N.Y. v. Commons W., LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 01253 (3d Dept. Mar. 5, 2026). Leave to … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NY3: Housing law that requires landlords to submit to premises and records searches is unconstitutional

E.D.N.Y.: Inevitable discovery doesn’t cure errors

Defendant’s cell phone was unreasonably seized and the contents suppressed. Inevitable discovery isn’t as broad as the government argues. United States v. Patchiav, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47106 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 7, 2026)*:

Posted in Cell phones, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Inevitable discovery doesn’t cure errors

TX6: Seizing thermometer’s protective sleeve from hospital waste for DNA was reasonable

The officer getting the protective sleeve from a hospital thermometer to test for defendant’s DNA wasn’t unreasonable. Mundt v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 2126 (Tex. App. – Texarkana Mar. 6, 2026) (unpublished). After an initial inspection of this vessel, … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, DNA, Forfeiture, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX6: Seizing thermometer’s protective sleeve from hospital waste for DNA was reasonable