Monthly Archives: March 2021

NY Kings Co.: Exclusionary rule not applied in civil case to end tenancy under rent control statute

Defendant was convicted of surreptitiously recording a tenant in another apartment with planted wireless camera. Some evidence in the criminal proceeding was suppressed. In a civil case to void his tenancy under the rent control laws, the exclusionary rule is … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Kings Co.: Exclusionary rule not applied in civil case to end tenancy under rent control statute

S.D.Ohio: Nexus shown for SW of business premises for drugs

“Applying this standard, the Field Affidavit is clearly not a bare bones affidavit. Intercepted phone calls, physical surveillance and trash pulls, along with information learned from confidential sources, would allow a reasonable officer ‘employing a healthy dose of common sense’ … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Nexus shown for SW of business premises for drugs

N.D.Ohio: Alleged ambiguity in whether nighttime search authorized resolved by all the circumstances in favor of it

It wasn’t obvious that the search warrant did not permit a nighttime search, and it was presented to the state judge at night involving a shooting that night. The circumstances were apparent that the search was to happen then. Moreover, … Continue reading

Posted in Nighttime search | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Alleged ambiguity in whether nighttime search authorized resolved by all the circumstances in favor of it

S.D.Ohio: GFE overcomes lack of nexus; officer unaware of some facts didn’t commit Franks violation

The Franks hearing established that the officer didn’t know that certain things happened during the investigation, so the officer wasn’t withholding information or misleading the court. Probable cause and nexus is [less than] tenuous: “This evidence, standing alone, does not … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: GFE overcomes lack of nexus; officer unaware of some facts didn’t commit Franks violation

S.D.Ohio: Nexus shown to business from alleged drug transactions outside

Nexus was shown to a business where drug transactions outside appeared to have continued inside, or at least the participants went inside right after. In any event, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Scott, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Nexus shown to business from alleged drug transactions outside

MA: No REP in unlocked basement of apt building

After a police foot chase, officers entered an unlocked basement of an apartment building and found a firearm that looked like one they were looking for. Defendant can’t show a reasonable expectation of privacy in the basement because everybody in … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MA: No REP in unlocked basement of apt building

OH12: State’s “reasonable mistake of fact” justification for stop has to be raised in trial court first

The state didn’t rely on a “reasonable mistake of fact” justification for the stop in the trial court, so it can’t for appeal. State v. Turner, 2021-Ohio-541, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 564 (12th Dist. Mar. 1, 2021). Defendant had some … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on OH12: State’s “reasonable mistake of fact” justification for stop has to be raised in trial court first

OH12: Officer responding to a mistreated dog call could walk to fence and look through then seize dog on exigency

An officer responded to an animal abuse complaint of a maltreated dog in defendant’s backyard. He parked in the driveway and walked to the door to inquire. No answer. He could see a fence with a missing board from the … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH12: Officer responding to a mistreated dog call could walk to fence and look through then seize dog on exigency

NE requires suppression issue be renewed when evidence admitted at trial

Failure to renew a suppression issue decided against you pretrial when the evidence is admitted is waiver in Nebraska. Besides, the issue on appeal would lose on the merits because the officer had reasonable suspicion for the stop and then … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Waiver | Comments Off on NE requires suppression issue be renewed when evidence admitted at trial

SD: Local officers called tribal officers and respected tribal authority before arresting def

Defendant was wanted for assault and found at an Indian casino hotel on a reservation. They took him into custody and towed his vehicle. The search of his hotel room and vehicle by search warrants was reasonable and respected tribal … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on SD: Local officers called tribal officers and respected tribal authority before arresting def

OH1: Order to get out of car doesn’t unreasonably extend a traffic stop

An officer’s order to get out of the car during a traffic stop does not expand the stop, and it is reasonable. Agreeing in the trial court that the stop was valid bars litigating it on appeal. State v. Jackson, … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: Order to get out of car doesn’t unreasonably extend a traffic stop

D.Minn.: IAC Franks proffer rejected as lacking sworn affidavits or any credibility at all

Defendant’s 2255 claimed that defense counsel was ineffective for not making a Franks challenge. Defendant’s offer of proof is rejected as just without any credibility at all in light of the record previously made. United States v. Petruk, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Minn.: IAC Franks proffer rejected as lacking sworn affidavits or any credibility at all

E.D.N.Y.: Def gets access to SW materials, but govt can redact informant’s info

The target of a search warrant long ago served is entitled to unsealing the affidavit, but the government can redact the affiant’s name and identifying information. United States v. Storage Room Numbers, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35977 (E.D. N.Y. Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def gets access to SW materials, but govt can redact informant’s info