Monthly Archives: June 2020

CA2: IAC claim not proper on motion for new trial

The district court acted within its discretion to deny a motion for new trial on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim for not moving to suppress before the trial. Defendant can raise it in post-conviction. United States v. Atuana, 2020 … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA2: IAC claim not proper on motion for new trial

Lawfare: Did a Government Drone Flight Over a Protest Violate the Fourth Amendment?

Lawfare: Did a Government Drone Flight Over a Protest Violate the Fourth Amendment? by Nathaniel Sobel (“On May 28, protestors in Minneapolis demonstrated late into the night against the killing of George Floyd and police brutality. The next day, on … Continue reading

Posted in Open fields | Comments Off on Lawfare: Did a Government Drone Flight Over a Protest Violate the Fourth Amendment?

Rolling Stone: No-Knock Warrants: Inside Police Tactic That Killed Breonna Taylor

Rolling Stone: No-Knock Warrants: Inside Police Tactic That Killed Breonna Taylor by EJ Dickson (“In certain cases, judges may allow authorities to enter a suspect’s home without announcing themselves — but since the death of Breonna Taylor, their use is … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on Rolling Stone: No-Knock Warrants: Inside Police Tactic That Killed Breonna Taylor

Recode by Vox: Why it matters that IBM is getting out of the facial recognition business

Recode by Vox: Why it matters that IBM is getting out of the facial recognition business by Rebecca Heilweil (“Researchers have for years warned about the problems with facial recognition. Now Big Blue is ditching the tech.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Recode by Vox: Why it matters that IBM is getting out of the facial recognition business

OneZero: Google’s Geofence Warrants Face a Major Legal Challenge

OneZero: Google’s Geofence Warrants Face a Major Legal Challenge by Liz Brody (“Police requests for Google data that pinpoints anyone near the scene of a crime increased by more than 500% last year…The opposition to geofencing warrants is growing. The … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on OneZero: Google’s Geofence Warrants Face a Major Legal Challenge

HI: Dog sniff for drugs in traffic stop was not reasonably related to the purpose of the stop

Dog sniff for drugs in traffic stop was not reasonably related to the purpose of the stop, and it is suppressed. State v. Ikimaka, 2020 Haw. LEXIS 139 (June 9, 2020):

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on HI: Dog sniff for drugs in traffic stop was not reasonably related to the purpose of the stop

D.Ariz.: Whether officer should have believed CI was lying not a Franks issue

Defendant contends that the affiant officer should have known that the CI was lying because of a motive to falsify, but doesn’t say how the officer would have known or did know. That’s insufficient for Franks. Another CI was not … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Whether officer should have believed CI was lying not a Franks issue

TN: Issue of issuing magistrate’s jurisdiction moot by automobile exception

Defendant’s dispute over whether the judge issuing the search warrant had jurisdiction over the vehicle from which DNA was taken because it was located in a different county is moot. The officers had probable cause in investigating a bloody homicide, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Issue of issuing magistrate’s jurisdiction moot by automobile exception

NM doesn’t permit questions about travel in routine traffic stops while federal courts do

New Mexico requires under its state constitution that all questions during a traffic stop not be fishing expeditions about other things unless reasonable suspicion is present. Asking about where defendant had been and who he met were not related to … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM doesn’t permit questions about travel in routine traffic stops while federal courts do

WaPo: Amazon bans police use of its facial-recognition technology for a year

WaPo: Amazon bans police use of its facial-recognition technology for a year by Jay Greene:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Amazon bans police use of its facial-recognition technology for a year

D.Ore. grants preliminary injunction against use of tear gas against peaceful protesters

Don’t Shoot Portland v. City of Portland, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100801 (D. Ore. June 9, 2020): While the Court acknowledges that Mayor Wheeler has issued additional guidance on the use of tear gas during these protests, Defendant has not … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on D.Ore. grants preliminary injunction against use of tear gas against peaceful protesters

E.D.N.C.: Police not required to leave car on property of another rather than impound it

The impoundment of defendant’s car on the property of another was reasonable. Officers were not required to wait for defendant to locate somebody to retrieve the car, and they didn’t have to leave it to inconvenience the property owner. United … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Police not required to leave car on property of another rather than impound it

CA4: “a reasonable jury could find that Jones was both secured and incapacitated” when police shot him; QI denied

“In 2013, Wayne Jones, a black man experiencing homelessness, was stopped by law enforcement in Martinsburg, West Virginia for walking alongside, rather than on, the sidewalk. By the end of this encounter, Jones would be dead. Armed only with a … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: “a reasonable jury could find that Jones was both secured and incapacitated” when police shot him; QI denied

W.D.Tenn.: Affidavit was conclusory as to drugs at drug dealer’s home [but it’s easy to fix next time]

The affidavit for search warrant failed to show nexus between defendant’s alleged drug dealing a month earlier and his residence. “The only information included in the affidavit to support this conclusory belief is the fact that Defendant, who happens to … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Affidavit was conclusory as to drugs at drug dealer’s home [but it’s easy to fix next time]

CA10: Unappealed suppression order from one district collateral estoppel on reindictment on same facts in a different district

Defendant was indicted for child pornography, and the district court suppressed. The government appealed but dismissed the appeal without filing a brief. In the district court it dismissed the indictment. Later, on the same evidence from the same search warrant, … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: Unappealed suppression order from one district collateral estoppel on reindictment on same facts in a different district

CA10: 15-minute call to EPIC when officer given inconsistent travel plans wasn’t unreasonable

Inconsistent travel plans coming from the driver and passenger justified a 15 minute call to EPIC to see if the vehicle had crossed the border recently, and this was not unreasonable. United States v. Morales, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 17865 … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: 15-minute call to EPIC when officer given inconsistent travel plans wasn’t unreasonable

MA: Owner’s DL was suspended, and it wasn’t apparent that driver wasn’t owner when stop occurred

Similar to Glover, Massachusetts held well before that the suspension of the owner’s DL can justify a stop. There was no indication [such as gender] here that the driver could not be the owner, so the stop was with reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on MA: Owner’s DL was suspended, and it wasn’t apparent that driver wasn’t owner when stop occurred

CA4: Opening jail legal mail away from inmate violated 1A, but separate 4A claim for that not clearly established

Opening pretrial detainee’s legal mail 15 times outside his presence was a First Amendment violation, even though he’d been suspected of receiving contraband about the witnesses against him both in legal and nonlegal mail. The First Amendment violation is injury … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA4: Opening jail legal mail away from inmate violated 1A, but separate 4A claim for that not clearly established

Proposed Justice in Policing Act of 2020, some proposals on arrest and frisk, qualified immunity, use of force, and no-knock warrants

Proposed Justice in Policing Act of 2020 in the House of Representatives: some proposals on arrest and frisk, qualified immunity, use of force, and searches: In § 103, repeals case law on qualified immunity in revised § 1983 (pdf at … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Proposed Justice in Policing Act of 2020, some proposals on arrest and frisk, qualified immunity, use of force, and no-knock warrants

Cal.2: Mistake of fact def was on probation made probation search unreasonable

Officers thought defendant was on probation and searched him, but he wasn’t at the time. The state put on no evidence of good faith, so the search fails for lack of a factual or legal basis for the search. People … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.2: Mistake of fact def was on probation made probation search unreasonable