Daily Archives: June 10, 2020

D.Ore. grants preliminary injunction against use of tear gas against peaceful protesters

Don’t Shoot Portland v. City of Portland, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100801 (D. Ore. June 9, 2020): While the Court acknowledges that Mayor Wheeler has issued additional guidance on the use of tear gas during these protests, Defendant has not … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on D.Ore. grants preliminary injunction against use of tear gas against peaceful protesters

E.D.N.C.: Police not required to leave car on property of another rather than impound it

The impoundment of defendant’s car on the property of another was reasonable. Officers were not required to wait for defendant to locate somebody to retrieve the car, and they didn’t have to leave it to inconvenience the property owner. United … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Police not required to leave car on property of another rather than impound it

CA4: “a reasonable jury could find that Jones was both secured and incapacitated” when police shot him; QI denied

“In 2013, Wayne Jones, a black man experiencing homelessness, was stopped by law enforcement in Martinsburg, West Virginia for walking alongside, rather than on, the sidewalk. By the end of this encounter, Jones would be dead. Armed only with a … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: “a reasonable jury could find that Jones was both secured and incapacitated” when police shot him; QI denied

W.D.Tenn.: Affidavit was conclusory as to drugs at drug dealer’s home [but it’s easy to fix next time]

The affidavit for search warrant failed to show nexus between defendant’s alleged drug dealing a month earlier and his residence. “The only information included in the affidavit to support this conclusory belief is the fact that Defendant, who happens to … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Affidavit was conclusory as to drugs at drug dealer’s home [but it’s easy to fix next time]

CA10: Unappealed suppression order from one district collateral estoppel on reindictment on same facts in a different district

Defendant was indicted for child pornography, and the district court suppressed. The government appealed but dismissed the appeal without filing a brief. In the district court it dismissed the indictment. Later, on the same evidence from the same search warrant, … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: Unappealed suppression order from one district collateral estoppel on reindictment on same facts in a different district