Monthly Archives: December 2019

Pacific Legal Foundation: How the Fourth Amendment can protect us from becoming a surveillance state

Pacific Legal Foundation: How the Fourth Amendment can protect us from becoming a surveillance state by Daniel Woislaw. Can it if we aren’t constantly vigilant, and not just going along?

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Pacific Legal Foundation: How the Fourth Amendment can protect us from becoming a surveillance state

CA1: Routine booking fingerprints even in an unlawful arrest not subject to exclusionary rule and are reasonable

Routine taking of booking fingerprints held not unreasonable, even if the arrest turned out to be unlawful. The district court held that they were admissible by inevitable discovery because the officers would have found that defendant was here unlawfully. The … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA1: Routine booking fingerprints even in an unlawful arrest not subject to exclusionary rule and are reasonable

IA: Arrest of the “wrong guy” under a warrant unreasonable where no effort made to determine if he was the right guy or not

Arrest of the “wrong guy” under a warrant here was unreasonable. Defendant claimed he was the wrong Troy Ford, and the officer searched him finding drugs before even attempting to verify whether he was the right one. It didn’t take … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IA: Arrest of the “wrong guy” under a warrant unreasonable where no effort made to determine if he was the right guy or not

IA: Std of review of PC is not is there PC, but is there a substantial basis for believing there was PC

“Because the Fourth Amendment values the practice of obtaining a warrant to reduce the perception of intrusive police conduct, we do not strictly scrutinize the sufficiency of the underlying affidavit. … Instead, we decide whether the issuing magistrate had a … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on IA: Std of review of PC is not is there PC, but is there a substantial basis for believing there was PC

N.D.Ohio: 2255 including a 4A IAC claim denied for lack of any statement of facts of what’s at issue

Defendant filed a “laundry list” 2255. His Franks IAC claim is rejected for lack of any offer of proof that it would remotely be granted. Johnson v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 216544 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 17, 2019).* The … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: 2255 including a 4A IAC claim denied for lack of any statement of facts of what’s at issue

CNN: Attorney General Barr defends surveillance tool as Republican scrutiny grows

CNN: Attorney General Barr defends surveillance tool as Republican scrutiny grows by David Shortell (“Attorney General William Barr called the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act a ‘critical tool’ and vowed to preserve it Wednesday after suggestions from Republican lawmakers that the … Continue reading

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on CNN: Attorney General Barr defends surveillance tool as Republican scrutiny grows

AP: Officers shoot woman during search for man already in jail

AP: Officers shoot woman during search for man already in jail (“Officers who mistakenly entered a home trying to arrest an Alabama man who was already in jail shot a woman who was inside, news outlets reported.”)

Posted in Police misconduct | Comments Off on AP: Officers shoot woman during search for man already in jail

WaPo: Editorial: Why Congress needs to regulate facial-recognition systems

WaPo: Editorial: Why Congress needs to regulate facial-recognition systems (“A MASSIVE government study in which more than 18 million images of more than 8 million people were run through almost 200 algorithms has confirmed what researchers have been warning for years: Facial-recognition … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Editorial: Why Congress needs to regulate facial-recognition systems

NYTimes: Opinion: You Should Be Freaking Out About Privacy

NYTimes: Opinion: You Should Be Freaking Out About Privacy featuring Farhad Manjoo and Kara Swisher (“Nothing to hide, nothing to fear? Think again.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: Opinion: You Should Be Freaking Out About Privacy

NYTimes Editorial: Total Surveillance Is Not What America Signed Up For

NYTimes Editorial: Total Surveillance Is Not What America Signed Up For:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes Editorial: Total Surveillance Is Not What America Signed Up For

D.N.M.: Stopping the wrong guy wasn’t unreasonable; there was still probable cause

Stopping the wrong guy wasn’t unreasonable here. “The Court finds that the officers reasonably mistook Defendant for Mr. Pacheco. Defendant not only matched Mr. Pacheco’s description, but the officers also witnessed Defendant leaving an apartment Mr. Pacheco was known to … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Stopping the wrong guy wasn’t unreasonable; there was still probable cause

E.D.Tenn.: Knock-and-talk wasn’t drawn out to become a seizure at def’s own door; good Franks example

That the knock-and-talk was too long drawn out to turn into a seizure is rejected. The officers testified they smelled marijuana at the door. “The Court finds Defendants’ next two contentions, that the officers’ ability to smell marijuana at the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Knock and talk, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Knock-and-talk wasn’t drawn out to become a seizure at def’s own door; good Franks example

N.D.Ga.: Even if SW was not particular enough, it wasn’t so defective or obvious that the GFE should not apply

Even if the search warrant for defendant’s cell phone was overbroad, which isn’t even decided, it was not so overbroad that the good faith exception to the exclusionary should be applied. United States v. Obie, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 216350 … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Even if SW was not particular enough, it wasn’t so defective or obvious that the GFE should not apply

MO: Exclusionary rule inapplicable in civil and administrative proceedings

The exclusionary rule does not apply in civil or administrative proceedings. Mo. Landowners Alliance v. Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 2019 Mo. App. LEXIS 1975 (Dec. 17, 2019). There was reasonable suspicion to conduct a weapons search of defendant’s vehicle. The stop … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MO: Exclusionary rule inapplicable in civil and administrative proceedings

NYTimes: Police Surveillance Planes to Fly Above Baltimore in 2020

NYTimes: Police Surveillance Planes to Fly Above Baltimore in 2020 by AP (“BALTIMORE — The city of Baltimore will be monitored by surveillance airplanes for up to six months next year under a pilot program announced Friday that is aimed … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: Police Surveillance Planes to Fly Above Baltimore in 2020

D.Mont.: Testing a key in house locks to see if it works was a trespass under Jones and Jardines requiring a SW

Defendant was admitted to a mental hospital after a police call to an erratic person. Because of his apparent mental condition, his backpack was searched by hospital guards. That revealed a knife, a gun, and a house key. ATF was … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Trespass | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Testing a key in house locks to see if it works was a trespass under Jones and Jardines requiring a SW

OH10: DV victim who shared house had apparent authority to consent to search for weapon

Police were called to a domestic disturbance, and the victim in the house had the apparent authority to consent to search of a Home Depot bucket in their house where a gun was found. State v. Henize, 2019-Ohio-5202, 2019 Ohio … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Apparent authority, Excessive force | Comments Off on OH10: DV victim who shared house had apparent authority to consent to search for weapon

W.D.N.Y.: A mere general statement in motion to suppress SW lacks PC doesn’t preserve the issue

Defendant’s general argument that probable cause was lacking for the search warrant in this case was inadequate to preserve the issue. Even considering the merits, there was probable cause. United States v. Dolson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 216913 (W.D. N.Y. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: A mere general statement in motion to suppress SW lacks PC doesn’t preserve the issue

CA8: SW for MJ in urine wasn’t stale by eight day wait to execute

The search warrant for defendant’s urine sample to prove he had marijuana in his system wasn’t stale after eight days. Staleness is determined by whether the probable cause for the warrant dissipates before execution. There was testimony in the record … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA8: SW for MJ in urine wasn’t stale by eight day wait to execute

OH: State has burden to plead lack of standing in response to a motion to suppress and can’t remain silent without waiving

When defendant files a motion to suppress and the state questions standing, it has the burden of going forward to at least raise the issue so defendant can meet it. Without doing so in the trial court, the state waives … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Standing | Comments Off on OH: State has burden to plead lack of standing in response to a motion to suppress and can’t remain silent without waiving