Monthly Archives: April 2018

Lawfare: Prosecuting Attorneys Alongside Clients: Some Recent Examples

Lawfare: Prosecuting Attorneys Alongside Clients: Some Recent Examples By Harry Larson & Sabrina McCubbin

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Lawfare: Prosecuting Attorneys Alongside Clients: Some Recent Examples

OregonLive.com: Oregon is No. 2 in nation in requests for ‘sneak-and-peek’ search warrants

OregonLive.com: Oregon is No. 2 in nation in requests for ‘sneak-and-peek’ search warrants by Maxine Bernstein

Posted in Sneak and Peek | Comments Off on OregonLive.com: Oregon is No. 2 in nation in requests for ‘sneak-and-peek’ search warrants

The Legal Intelligencer: Justices to Eye Constitutionality of Consequences for DUI Blood Test Refusals

The Legal Intelligencer: Justices to Eye Constitutionality of Consequences for DUI Blood Test Refusals by Zach Needles: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments over whether it’s unconstitutional for a DUI suspect’s refusal of a warrantless blood draw … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on The Legal Intelligencer: Justices to Eye Constitutionality of Consequences for DUI Blood Test Refusals

Daily Report: Sex Tape Verdict Spurs Debate on Surveillance Law

Daily Report: Sex Tape Verdict Spurs Debate on Surveillance Law by Greg Land: Two veteran lawyers, former State Bar of Georgia President Robin Frazer Clark and prosecutor-turned-defense attorney Noah Pines, differed sharply in their views of Georgia’s illegal surveillance statute … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on Daily Report: Sex Tape Verdict Spurs Debate on Surveillance Law

UT: While the CI’s stories alone were weak, police corroborated them

The two CI’s stories were weak in themselves, but the police succeeded in corroborating enough to rise to probable cause. State v. Matheson, 2018 Utah App. LEXIS 66 (Apr. 13, 2018).* Hitting the lane dividing line was justification for the … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on UT: While the CI’s stories alone were weak, police corroborated them

W.D.N.C.: Roadblock near scene of home invasion robbery was reasonable

Police set up a perimeter a distance around the scene of a home invasion looking for the car involved, and defendant’s car was stopped. This checkpoint stop was valid under Illinois v. Lidster. United States v. Gilmore, 2018 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Roadblocks | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Roadblock near scene of home invasion robbery was reasonable

FL2: Def stopped in the driveway where package of MJ was to delivered was without RS

“A mysterious parcel package was intercepted while en route to be delivered. It contained approximately ten pounds of marijuana. Someone sent the package. Someone was presumably going to pick it up. The principal question this appeal presents is whether investigating … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL2: Def stopped in the driveway where package of MJ was to delivered was without RS

CA9: MMJ card didn’t undermine PC for possession

The arrest was based on probable cause to believe marijuana would be found. The existence of a medical marijuana card is only a defense to the holder, and it doesn’t undermine probable cause. Assenberg v. Whitman County, 2018 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: MMJ card didn’t undermine PC for possession

D.Kan.: Description of thing to be seized as a firearm wasn’t fatal where weapon of mass destruction was being sought

A Facebook warrant wasn’t overbroad because it involved a conspiracy and it was thus more difficult to describe what exactly was sought. As to a dwelling warrant, an error in the description of the thing to be seized as a … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Description of thing to be seized as a firearm wasn’t fatal where weapon of mass destruction was being sought

Thinking:

Col. Abel to his lawyer: Abel: Standing there like that you reminded me of the man that used to come to our house when I was young. My father used to say: “watch this man”. So I did. Every time … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Thinking:

The Hill: We need a new law to protect lawyer-client communications

The Hill: We need a new law to protect lawyer-client communications by Alan Dershowitz: The Fifth Amendment merely prohibits the use of illegally obtained self-incriminatory information at the defendant’s criminal trial. The Fourth Amendment prohibits unlawful intrusions into the privacy … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on The Hill: We need a new law to protect lawyer-client communications

Atlantic: The Principle of Professional Law Enforcement Is Now on the Line

Atlantic: The Principle of Professional Law Enforcement Is Now on the Line by Benjamin Wittes: If the president can, with impunity, remove the deputy attorney general, the very notion that law enforcement has a higher function than serving power becomes … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Atlantic: The Principle of Professional Law Enforcement Is Now on the Line

Atlantic: Drug Use Is Detectable on Your Fingerprints

Atlantic: Drug Use Is Detectable on Your Fingerprints by Rod McCullom

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on Atlantic: Drug Use Is Detectable on Your Fingerprints

Law.com: Why Some Judicial Nominees Struggle When Asked About ‘Brown v. Board of Education’

Law.com: Why Some Judicial Nominees Struggle When Asked About ‘Brown v. Board of Education’ by Tony Mauro: For some nominees, the concern is that by answering explicitly, they would be viewed as biased. For others, the decisions they are being … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Law.com: Why Some Judicial Nominees Struggle When Asked About ‘Brown v. Board of Education’

CA4: The facts not included in the affidavit for SW only would have enhanced the PC

“We conclude that, contrary to Combs’ assertions, there is no evidence that Davis intentionally or recklessly omitted material information from the affidavit. In fact, Davis’s testimony at the suppression hearing shows that the facts not included in the affidavit would … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA4: The facts not included in the affidavit for SW only would have enhanced the PC

CA1: Suppression motion was untimely without a showing of good cause, and it would not be determined on appeal

“Sweeney neither challenged the finding of untimeliness before the district court, nor does he now argue that his delay in filing the motion to suppress was excused by good cause. As such, because of his waiver, we need not address … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA1: Suppression motion was untimely without a showing of good cause, and it would not be determined on appeal

Cal.-LA Cty: REP of apartment tenants barred discovery against them as witnesses

Tenants of an apartment complex had a reasonable expectation of privacy from being brought into a discovery dispute. They had a right not to have their privacy invaded. Castillo v. LA Props. Heffesse LLC, 2018 Cal. Super. LEXIS 119 (Super. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Cal.-LA Cty: REP of apartment tenants barred discovery against them as witnesses

ABAJ: How will prosecutors handle privileged documents from Michael Cohen raids?

No, the attorney-client privilege isn’t dead, and neither is the crime fraud exception. ABAJ: How will prosecutors handle privileged documents from Michael Cohen raids? by Stephanie Francis Ward:

Posted in Privileges, Scope of search | Comments Off on ABAJ: How will prosecutors handle privileged documents from Michael Cohen raids?

CA2: SW for computers doesn’t require they be specifically identified

The Fourth Amendment does not require that a search warrant for computers specifically identify them [because that’s not possible]. A search warrant to seize computers permits their search under Rule 41. United States v. Beal, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 9056 … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Particularity | Comments Off on CA2: SW for computers doesn’t require they be specifically identified

OH7: Driving on a suspended license doesn’t justify search incident of the car

Driving on a suspended license does not justify a search incident of his vehicle. Even worse, however, there was no justification for the arrest anyway. He was interrogated while handcuffed and admitted that there was heroin in his shoe. There … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on OH7: Driving on a suspended license doesn’t justify search incident of the car