Monthly Archives: November 2017

S.D.Ill.: Off-duty officer working store security validly seized weapon

A local police officer was working off-duty security at a grocery store on the night shift. He’d seen defendant in there many times in the previous four years in the store, and defendant was usually under the influence. Plus, the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Off-duty officer working store security validly seized weapon

SD: Withdrawal of consent doesn’t get the incriminating stuff back

The trial court didn’t err in finding that defendant consented to search of his cell phone and DNA at the hospital after a murder. He was strenuously trying to show the police that he wasn’t involved and was volunteering consent. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on SD: Withdrawal of consent doesn’t get the incriminating stuff back

D.Me.: Sex offender on parole/probation subject to suspicionless search of computer

Defendant was a sex offender on probation after prison, and he had a search condition. The police and probation had information that he had child pornography on his computer. A probation search of an SD card revealed the child pornography. … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Me.: Sex offender on parole/probation subject to suspicionless search of computer

D.N.M.: Def was evicted once arrested and couldn’t go back to apt; landlord’s gathering stuff was a private search, and papers were made available to police

After defendant’s arrest, the landlord evicted him and gathered up his stuff. The police got the paperwork from the apartment from the landlord, and some of it was incriminating. Because the police didn’t instigate the landlord evicting him other than … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Def was evicted once arrested and couldn’t go back to apt; landlord’s gathering stuff was a private search, and papers were made available to police

FourthAmendment.com named to ABA Journal’s Web 100 top law blogs for third year

ABAJ: Welcome to the 2017 ABA Journal Web 100 by Andrew Lefkowitz, Sarah Mui and Stephen Rynkiewicz. For the last ten years, it was called the ABA Journal’s Blawg 100. The name was changed this year to include podcasts, twitter … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on FourthAmendment.com named to ABA Journal’s Web 100 top law blogs for third year

The Hill: Clock ticking down on NSA surveillance powers

The Hill: Clock ticking down on NSA surveillance powers by Katie Bo Williams:

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on The Hill: Clock ticking down on NSA surveillance powers

NYTimes: ICE’s Courthouse Arrests Undercut Democracy

NYTimes: ICE’s Courthouse Arrests Undercut Democracy by César Cuauhtémoc and García Hernández:

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on NYTimes: ICE’s Courthouse Arrests Undercut Democracy

Michigan Daily: Libertarians protest roadside drug-testing program

Stunning, the chutzpa of the Michigan State Police: Michigan Daily: Libertarians protest roadside drug-testing program by Leah Graham:

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Roadblocks | Comments Off on Michigan Daily: Libertarians protest roadside drug-testing program

NYTimes: How a Radio Shack Robbery Could Spur a New Era in Digital Privacy

NYTimes: How a Radio Shack Robbery Could Spur a New Era in Digital Privacy by Adam Liptak It could also seal the fate of our lack of right to privacy in information unless Congress acts. Considering all the FISA posturing … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NYTimes: How a Radio Shack Robbery Could Spur a New Era in Digital Privacy

WaPo (Opinion): The Supreme Court’s privacy precedent is outdated

WaPo (Opinion): The Supreme Court’s privacy precedent is outdated by Stephen H. Sachs: (Stephen H. Sachs was Maryland attorney general from 1979 to 1987.)

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo (Opinion): The Supreme Court’s privacy precedent is outdated

D.Md.: Because of state decrim, a trash pull that merely shows def was a user isn’t PC of trafficking

In a marijuana decriminalization state, merely finding evidence of marijuana usage, not trafficking, wasn’t probable cause for a search warrant even under Gates or the good faith exception. United States v. Lyles, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 193030 (D. Md. Nov. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Md.: Because of state decrim, a trash pull that merely shows def was a user isn’t PC of trafficking

D.Mass.: Def’s quibbling in a Franks challenge is insufficient: “I’m just a ‘drug dealer’ not a ‘drug trafficker.’”

Defendant is quibbling rather than making a bona fide Franks argument that he was arraigned 11 times not 10 on other drug cases and that he was a “drug trafficker” when he insists he is just a “drug dealer.” One … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Def’s quibbling in a Franks challenge is insufficient: “I’m just a ‘drug dealer’ not a ‘drug trafficker.’”

D.Neb.: 24 minutes for a stop wasn’t unreasonable under Rodriguez where officer didn’t do anything other than wait for a response on his criminal history check request

Whether a stop was too long for Rodriguez can be fact-bound. Here, while it was all 24 minutes for the criminal history check with the delay in getting information back, the officer wasn’t talking to or questioning the defendant. “The … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Neb.: 24 minutes for a stop wasn’t unreasonable under Rodriguez where officer didn’t do anything other than wait for a response on his criminal history check request

CA5: COA granted on whether District Court should have held a hearing on IAC claim, but pet’r didn’t brief it. Affirmed.

“Our court granted Pryor a COA on one issue: whether the district court abused its discretion in denying Rule 60(b) relief from the denial of his § 2255 motion, by refusing to consider pages missing from his affidavit in opposition … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: COA granted on whether District Court should have held a hearing on IAC claim, but pet’r didn’t brief it. Affirmed.

Vice News: How cops hack into your phone without a warrant 

Vice News: How cops hack into your phone without a warrant by y Isabella McKinley Corbo [re: Carpenter]:  Right now, a murky web of federal and state statutes determine how easily cops can access data on Americans’ cell phones. While … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information | Comments Off on Vice News: How cops hack into your phone without a warrant 

AP (via ABC): Does cellphone-sweeping ‘StingRay’ technology go too far?

AP (via ABc): Does cellphone-sweeping ‘StingRay’ technology go too far? by Colleen Long:

Posted in Cell site simulators | Comments Off on AP (via ABC): Does cellphone-sweeping ‘StingRay’ technology go too far?

PA: POs have authority to search visitors in parolee’s house at time of parole visit with RS

“[P]arole agents have the authority to conduct a protective Terry frisk of non-parolees within the course of executing their statutorily imposed duties, so long as reasonable suspicion supports the agents’ conduct.” Here, POs entered the parolee’s house for a visit … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: POs have authority to search visitors in parolee’s house at time of parole visit with RS

CA6: Litigating and losing a search issue in state court estops a federal claim over same issue

Collateral estoppel applied where defendant lost on his search issue in state court so he could not litigate it in federal court. Also, he claimed a Franks violation that the officers misled the issuing magistrate, but that was not factually … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Litigating and losing a search issue in state court estops a federal claim over same issue

NY3: Emptying purse on seat and saying ‘you can check my car, you can check me’ was consent

In a traffic stop, the officer saw credit cards with a male name but a female operating the car. “Upon asking the owner about the person named on the cards, the owner denied knowing that person or being the owner … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on NY3: Emptying purse on seat and saying ‘you can check my car, you can check me’ was consent

CA3: Citation or summons is not an “arrest” in common usage or in the single arrest situations in application of the U.S.S.G.

A citation or summons is not an “arrest” in common usage or in the single arrest situations in application of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. United States v. Ley, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 23637 (3d Cir. Nov. 22, 2017). Defendant didn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof | Comments Off on CA3: Citation or summons is not an “arrest” in common usage or in the single arrest situations in application of the U.S.S.G.