Monthly Archives: March 2017

CA5: Interstate bus passenger had no standing against a dog sniff of the luggage compartment

An interstate bus passenger had no standing against a dog sniff of the luggage compartment of the bus. United States v. Rodriguez-Lara, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3774 (5th Cir. March 2, 2017):

Posted in Dog sniff, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: Interstate bus passenger had no standing against a dog sniff of the luggage compartment

D.N.J.: “including but not limited to” in SW was not overbroad; it had to be read in context

A search warrant with a particularity clause of “including but not limited to” was not overbroad and had to be read in context of the preceding language. United States v. Schaffer, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26257 (D.N.J. Feb. 24, 2017).* … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Independent source, Particularity | Comments Off on D.N.J.: “including but not limited to” in SW was not overbroad; it had to be read in context

OR: Oregon clarifies the reasonable suspicion standard

Oregon clarifies the reasonable suspicion standard. State v. Maciel-Figueroa, 361 Ore. 163, 2017 Ore. LEXIS 166 (March 2, 2017), aff’g State v. Maciel-Figueroa, 273 Ore. App. 298, 356 P.3d 674 (2015):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Oregon clarifies the reasonable suspicion standard

OR: Telling def to let out dogs so police could search his house was not his consent

The officers showed up to search defendant’s house and told him that he could let his dogs out or they would do it before the search. His letting the dogs out wasn’t consent to the search. “Moreover, under the totality … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on OR: Telling def to let out dogs so police could search his house was not his consent

W.D.Tenn.: Because ‘guns and drugs go together,’ faint smell of MJ plus furtive movement justified frisk

Defendant was stopped for a cracked windshield, which it clearly was. “Ordering Henderson to step out of the car was only a de minimis intrusion of his personal liberty, and it did not violate his Fourth Amendment rights.” “Officer Putman … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Because ‘guns and drugs go together,’ faint smell of MJ plus furtive movement justified frisk

Playpen SWs: arstechnica: To keep Tor hack source code secret, DOJ dismisses child porn case

arstechnica: To keep Tor hack source code secret, DOJ dismisses child porn case by Cyrus Farivar DOJ: “Disclosure is not currently an option.”

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Playpen SWs: arstechnica: To keep Tor hack source code secret, DOJ dismisses child porn case

WaPo: How hard is it to get an intelligence wiretap? Pretty hard.

WaPo: How hard is it to get an intelligence wiretap? Pretty hard. by By Ellen Nakashima:

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on WaPo: How hard is it to get an intelligence wiretap? Pretty hard.

CA10: The common law “in the presence” requirement for warrantless misdemeanor arrests isn’t mandated by 4A

There was probable cause to arrest defendant when he became combative about being questioned for a theft from a Walgreens two days earlier which resulted in a six month sentence. Plaintiff’s argument that the off-duty officer couldn’t arrest without an … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA10: The common law “in the presence” requirement for warrantless misdemeanor arrests isn’t mandated by 4A

MS: No IAC for not pursuing an obvious scrivener’s error; warrant issued same day it was applied for

The search warrant was clearly issued September 4th. The typo “Aug.” was on some of the papers, but reading the entirety of the paperwork, it was obvious this was only a scrivener’s error. The warrant was issued the same day … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on MS: No IAC for not pursuing an obvious scrivener’s error; warrant issued same day it was applied for

LA4: Calling police to a dead body in your home and then letting them in is consent

“Defendant called the police to report that he found his friend dead in the residence. The call was dispatched as an unclassified death. Det. Gex was the only responding police officer who testified. He arrived at the scene between 8:00 … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on LA4: Calling police to a dead body in your home and then letting them in is consent

E.D.Ark.: There is no such thing as a negligent search and seizure claim

There is no such thing as a negligent search and seizure claim. Rudd v. City of Jonesboro, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28682 (E.D.Ark. March 1, 2017). The search of plaintiff’s truck in a garage was reasonable and officers get qualified … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: There is no such thing as a negligent search and seizure claim

E.D.Ky.: Def’s handcuffing was not an arrest, but it was custody for Miranda purposes

“The Court finds that Sydnor was not placed under formal arrest when officers handcuffed him at the beginning of the search. However, Sydnor was in custody for purposes of Miranda during the search. Regarding the statements themselves, the first one … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Def’s handcuffing was not an arrest, but it was custody for Miranda purposes

TX14: When trial court finds two theories, defendant has to argue both on appeal or he defaults one

The state raised alternate theories and both were found by the trial court. The defendant didn’t put on a defense to the state’s search incident argument. On appeal, he didn’t argue the search incident issues and defaulted them. Mixon v. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on TX14: When trial court finds two theories, defendant has to argue both on appeal or he defaults one

IN: No RS for a protective sweep after def was arrested

A protective sweep of a closed room requires reasonable suspicion that an attack could be launched from the room. After defendant was arrested, there was no reasonable suspicion there was anybody else in the house; therefore, no reasonable suspicion. Johnson … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Protective sweep | Comments Off on IN: No RS for a protective sweep after def was arrested

WI: The low threshold for def’s BAC level contributed to exigent circumstances

Defendant was unconscious after hitting a deer with his motorcycle when his blood was drawn in the hospital. There was probable cause, and, because of the delay, the officer reasonably concluded there were exigent circumstances because defendant’s offense threshold was … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on WI: The low threshold for def’s BAC level contributed to exigent circumstances

NJ strip search for $6.50 traffic ticket violates state statute

New Jersey by statute prohibits strip searches except for a crime. Defendant was arrested for an outstanding $6.50 traffic ticket and strip searched. The state can’t bootstrap this arrest into a search incident. State v. Evans, 2017 N.J. Super. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Strip search | Comments Off on NJ strip search for $6.50 traffic ticket violates state statute

CA8: Adding search condition to supervised release after serving 26 years didn’t violate ex post facto clause

Defendant served about 26 years of a 30½ year sentence, and, after release, a search condition was added, and it did not violate the ex post facto clause. United States v. Winston, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3685 (8th Cir. March … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA8: Adding search condition to supervised release after serving 26 years didn’t violate ex post facto clause

CA9: States court’s rationale for rejecting 4A claim subject to “unreasonable application” clause of § 2254(d)(1) on habeas

On federal habeas, the state court’s determination that defense counsel was reasonable in not filing a motion to suppress was subject to the “unreasonable application” clause of § 2254(d)(1). The state court’s denials were not an unreasonable application of the … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA9: States court’s rationale for rejecting 4A claim subject to “unreasonable application” clause of § 2254(d)(1) on habeas

OH7: House door wide open, no cars in driveway, skittish dog and a lot of dog feces justified entry on exigency

The emergency aid exception justified entry into defendant’s house where the officer reasonably feared the owner or occupant of the house was in some sort of danger based upon the front door being wide open in the middle of winter, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH7: House door wide open, no cars in driveway, skittish dog and a lot of dog feces justified entry on exigency

CA7: Being passed out at the wheel is RS of drunk driving

Being passed out at the wheel is reasonable suspicion of drunk driving. Still, the officer had the authority to order defendant out of the car and the gun would have been seen inevitably anyway. United States v. Dickson, 2017 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Being passed out at the wheel is RS of drunk driving