Monthly Archives: June 2014

BLT: Lawyers, Hobbyists Bemoan New Drone Rules

BLT: Lawyers, Hobbyists Bemoan New Drone Rules by Jimmy Hoover: Entrepreneurs like Jeff Bezos looking to incorporate drones into their business practices will have to wait a little longer, according to a proposed rule from the Federal Aviation Administration about … Continue reading

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on BLT: Lawyers, Hobbyists Bemoan New Drone Rules

LawFare: A Failure of Protocol

LawFare: A Failure of Protocol by Tim Edgar: The Supreme Court’s decision requiring a warrant for searches of cell phones incident to arrest affirms that we are entitled to privacy in the digital age. These expectations, the Chief Justice explains, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on LawFare: A Failure of Protocol

ScotusBlog: Symposium: The Court starts to catch up with technology

ScotusBlog: Symposium: The Court starts to catch up with technology by Mason C. Clutter: Some thought the Supreme Court in Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie, the two cellphone searches incident to arrest cases this Term, would split … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on ScotusBlog: Symposium: The Court starts to catch up with technology

MA: Where def already admitted ownership of computer, Fifth Amd no bar to providing passwords

Where the defendant has already admitted that the computers are his, he can be compelled to provide the encryption password, and the Fifth Amendment is not violated. Commonwealth v. Gelfgatt, 468 Mass. 512, 11 N.E.3d 605 (2014): The Commonwealth contends … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on MA: Where def already admitted ownership of computer, Fifth Amd no bar to providing passwords

WA: State can comment at trial on refusal to take FST

Because there is no constitutional right to refuse an FST, the state can comment on it at trial. State v. Mecham, 2014 Wash. App. LEXIS 1541 (June 23, 2014): ¶39 Mecham did not have a constitutional right to refuse consent … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WA: State can comment at trial on refusal to take FST

N.D.Ga.: Summers and Bailey don’t apply where there is probable cause

Michigan v. Summers (1981) and Bailey v. United States (2013) don’t even apply where there is independent probable cause for the suspect. This motion to suppress is “patently meritless.” United States v. Bocanegra, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86481 (N.D. Ga. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Summers and Bailey don’t apply where there is probable cause

GA: Defendant’s effort to distance himself from drugs led to no standing

Defendant’s effort to distance himself from drugs led to no standing. “Barlow testified that only his mother, stepfather, and brother lived at the Sherbrooke Way residence, and he denied currently living at the residence or having a bedroom there. Barlow … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on GA: Defendant’s effort to distance himself from drugs led to no standing

CA7: Entry to arrest for at best disorderly conduct was unreasonable

Officers called to a clearly non-violent domestic shouting match had no exigency or other reason to enter plaintiff’s home and arrest him. All the facts and circumstances showed that he was unarmed and he wasn’t a threat. Hawkins v. Bowersock, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA7: Entry to arrest for at best disorderly conduct was unreasonable

Salon: A SWAT team blew a hole in my 2-year-old son

Salon: A SWAT team blew a hole in my 2-year-old son by Alecia Phonesavanh: That’s right: Officers threw a flashbang grenade in my son’s crib — and left a hole in his chest. It gets worse.

Posted in Excessive force, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Salon: A SWAT team blew a hole in my 2-year-old son

EFF: Smith v. Maryland Turns 35, But Its Health Is Declining

EFF: Smith v. Maryland Turns 35, But Its Health Is Declining The U.S. Supreme Court’s 1979 decision of Smith v. Maryland turned 35 years old last week. Since it was decided, Smith has stood for the idea that people have … Continue reading

Posted in Informational privacy | Comments Off on EFF: Smith v. Maryland Turns 35, But Its Health Is Declining

LAT: LAPD’s two drones under lock-and-key by feds until rules in place

LAT: LAPD’s two drones under lock-and-key by feds until rules in place by Joseph Serna: The move to hand them over to the Department of Homeland Security was a response to public perception and strict federal laws on how law … Continue reading

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on LAT: LAPD’s two drones under lock-and-key by feds until rules in place

Western Journalism: Shocking: Tales Of This SWAT Team Raid Might Give You Nightmares

Western Journalism: Shocking: Tales Of This SWAT Team Raid Might Give You Nightmares by B. Christopher Agee: Although the Fourth Amendment ostensibly guarantees Americans the right to security within their own homes, a Florida couple reportedly learned firsthand that federal … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Western Journalism: Shocking: Tales Of This SWAT Team Raid Might Give You Nightmares

News stories about Riley thus far (updated)

NYT: Major Ruling Shields Privacy of Cellphones NYT: The Supreme Court Justices Have Cellphones, Too NYT: Cellphone Ruling Could Alter Police Methods, Experts Say WaPo: Supreme Court says police must get warrants for most cellphone searches WaPo: Volokh: The Significance … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on News stories about Riley thus far (updated)

SCOTUS: A search warrant is required for a cell phone; generally no search incident

Riley v. California: A search warrant is generally required for search of a cell phone. The search incident justifications do not apply to the wealth of personal information that likely will be there. Riley v. California, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4497, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Search incident | Comments Off on SCOTUS: A search warrant is required for a cell phone; generally no search incident

NMI: Search of cigarette pack reasonable in SI to look for weapon

Defendant was on a moped with another, and they were stopped at a sobriety checkpoint. The registration was years out of date, and they were directed aside for a more intense review. Defendant’s cigarette pack aroused suspicion because of the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory, Search incident | Comments Off on NMI: Search of cigarette pack reasonable in SI to look for weapon

CA7: Supervised release search condition without reasonable suspicion unreasonable here

Because defendant wasn’t a sex offender or involved with contraband, a supervised released search condition of searches without reasonable suspicion was unreasonable. United States v. Farmer, 755 F.3d 849 (7th Cir. 2014): “[W]e are … at a loss to see … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA7: Supervised release search condition without reasonable suspicion unreasonable here

ND: Male driver’s consent doesn’t extend to female passenger’s purse in a car

The driver of the car was male, and he granted consent to search the car. It was unreasonable for the officer to believe that that consent extended to the woman passenger’s purse. State v. Daniels, 2014 ND 124, 2014 N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on ND: Male driver’s consent doesn’t extend to female passenger’s purse in a car

ND: BAC consent not coerced just because a penalty extends to refusal

“[¶24] As discussed, an individual’s consent is not coerced simply because an administrative penalty has been attached to refusing the test or that law enforcement recites that law to the driver. Here, examining the totality of the circumstances at the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on ND: BAC consent not coerced just because a penalty extends to refusal

sayanythingblog: Expert: John Doe raids raise ‘troubling’ Fourth Amendment questions

sayanythingblog: Expert: John Doe raids raise ‘troubling’ Fourth Amendment questions by M.D. Kittle: MADISON, Wis. – Troubling. That’s how one Fourth Amendment expert describes the manner in which search warrants were executed in a politically charged John Doe investigation into … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on sayanythingblog: Expert: John Doe raids raise ‘troubling’ Fourth Amendment questions

W.D.Pa.: “Cell phones and firearms are generally considered the ‘tools of the trade’ of drug traffickers”

“Cell phones and firearms are generally considered the ‘tools of the trade’ of drug traffickers, which the involved detectives fully understood and conveyed to the magistrate judge. … United States v. Jones, Cr. 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54575 (E.D. Pa. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: “Cell phones and firearms are generally considered the ‘tools of the trade’ of drug traffickers”