Daily Archives: June 6, 2014

Legal Intelligencer: Dougherty Wants Federal Judge to Order Affidavit Resealed

Legal Intelligencer: Dougherty Wants Federal Judge to Order Affidavit Resealed: Labor union leader John Dougherty has asked a federal judge to order a state court to reseal an FBI affidavit of probable cause related to a search of Dougherty’s home … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Legal Intelligencer: Dougherty Wants Federal Judge to Order Affidavit Resealed

E.D.Tex.: Right address but wrong city in urban area was not constitutional defect since right house was searched

The address was given as Bridge City not Orange, Texas, but the officers misapprehended that the city limits was another block over. There was no chance here that the wrong house was searched, so this is not a constitutional error. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Right address but wrong city in urban area was not constitutional defect since right house was searched

CA10: Not unreasonable to handcuff occupants during execution of SW for gun

In execution of a search warrant for a gun, it wasn’t unreasonable for the officers to handcuff people there for officer safety even through there was a suggestion that the gun had moved before the SW arrived. Wigley v. City … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA10: Not unreasonable to handcuff occupants during execution of SW for gun

E.D.Wis.: Entry into def’s house two hours after robbery was admittedly not “hot pursuit”

Officers arrived at defendant’s house two hours after defendant, a suspect in a robbery. It wasn’t hot pursuit and they were looking for him to “talk to him,” not arrest him. The entry into the basement was not a protective … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Entry into def’s house two hours after robbery was admittedly not “hot pursuit”

AR: Stop was without RS where it was to tell defendant his neighbors complained about him

Defendant’s stop was without any reasonable suspicion he had committed any kind of offense. The stop was to tell defendant that the neighbors were complaining about him. Dewitt v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 369 (June 4, 2014).* The use of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AR: Stop was without RS where it was to tell defendant his neighbors complained about him

WV: Guest who took over house to run drug operation and threatened host denied standing

Defendant could not claim to be an “overnight guest” with standing where he took over the house, ran an illegal drug trade there for three weeks against the wishes of the owner, and threatened to kill his host if she … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on WV: Guest who took over house to run drug operation and threatened host denied standing

MA: Reasonable delay in finishing search of cell phone with SW is permissible

Delay in searching a cell phone with a warrant is governed by the rules of searching computers with warrants, and a reasonable delay doesn’t void the search. Commonwealth v. Ericson, 85 Mass. App. Ct. 326 (May 23, 2014):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MA: Reasonable delay in finishing search of cell phone with SW is permissible

New Law Review Article: Abidor v. Napolitano: Suspicionless Cell Phone and Laptop “Strip” Searches at the Border Compromise the Fourth and Fifth Amendments

Abidor v. Napolitano: Suspicionless Cell Phone and Laptop “Strip” Searches at the Border Compromise the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, Adam Lamparello & Charles E. MacLean, 108 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 280 (2014). Abstract: Technology has outpaced the law, and … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on New Law Review Article: Abidor v. Napolitano: Suspicionless Cell Phone and Laptop “Strip” Searches at the Border Compromise the Fourth and Fifth Amendments

CA11: Airport screenings are administrative searches

Airport screenings are administrative searches. During a more intense screening here, it was not unreasonable to look through a book because of the possibility of “sheet explosives.” The whole process here took about an hour, but it was plaintiff’s own … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Airport screenings are administrative searches