Daily Archives: June 10, 2014

WaPo: NSA fights preservation of data sought for suit

WaPo: NSA fights preservation of data sought for suit by Andrea Peterson: The National Security Agency recently used a novel argument for not holding onto information it collects about users online activity: it’s too complex.

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on WaPo: NSA fights preservation of data sought for suit

CA7: “[T]the Fourth Amendment is not a bulwark against typos.”

DNA warrant for defendant that transposed month and day (11-01 v. 01-11) using military and international convention was still for him. “[T]the Fourth Amendment is not a bulwark against typos.” United States v. Clark, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 10613 (7th … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA7: “[T]the Fourth Amendment is not a bulwark against typos.”

E.D.Tex.: Officer’s testimony the falsity in the SW affidavit was a “mere mistake” good enough to overcome Franks

False statement in an affidavit was testified to being a “mere mistake” in reporting information so the good faith exception still applies. If the officer testified it was a “mere mistake,” well, then, it can’t be wilfully false. Thus, the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Officer’s testimony the falsity in the SW affidavit was a “mere mistake” good enough to overcome Franks

TX14: No per se rule on exigency for DUI blood draw; state carries burden

Defendant’s blood draw in this DUI case violated the Fourth Amendment for lack of any exigent circumstances. Under McNeely, mere passage of time is no longer enough. There is no per se rule that the time to investigate an accident … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on TX14: No per se rule on exigency for DUI blood draw; state carries burden