Monthly Archives: April 2014

New Law Review Article: Civil discovery as a search? Probable cause required?

New Law Review Article: A Tale of Two Searches: Intrusive Civil Discovery Rules Violate the Fourth Amendment Chad DeVeaux, A Tale of Two Searches: Intrusive Civil Discovery Rules Violate the Fourth Amendment, 46 Conn. L. Rev. 1083 (2014). Abstract:

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant execution | Leave a comment

New Law Review Article: “Personal Curtilage”: Fourth Amendment Security In Public

Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, Personal Curtilage: Fourth Amendment Security in Public, 55 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1283 (2014). Abstract:

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Leave a comment

C.D.Cal.: Administrative searches for condom use in the porn industry

LA County requires that adult film producers obtain a permit and requires performers to use condoms during vaginal and anal intercourse. They have to keep the permit on display, and county health inspectors can enter at any time to inspect … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Leave a comment

AOL: Senate Committee Votes To Keep Driver Black Box Data Private

AOL: Senate Committee Votes To Keep Driver Black Box Data Private The legislation stipulates that the owner or lessee of the vehicle is the only person entitled to the data in the black box

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Leave a comment

M.D.Pa.: Failure to show SW not Fourth Amendment violation

Even if defendant was not shown a search warrant during the search (a fact in dispute), that’s not a ground to suppress. It violates Rule 41, but not the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Harley, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49396 … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Warrant execution | Leave a comment

HuffPo: DEA Raided This Woman’s House After She Shopped At A Garden Store

HuffPo: DEA Raided This Woman’s House After She Shopped At A Garden Store by Matt Sledge:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

M.D.Pa.: Police recording the one side of a telephone conversation they could already hear did not implicate ECPA

Police recording the one side of a telephone conversation they could already hear did not implicate the Electronic Communications Privacy act. United States v. Ray, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49647 (M.D. Pa. April 10, 2014):

Posted in Cell phones, ECPA | Leave a comment

New Law Review Article: Binary Searches and the Central Meaning of the Fourth Amendment

Lawrence Rosenthal, Binary Searches and the Central Meaning of the Fourth Amendment, 22 Wm. & Mary Bill of Rts. J. 881 (2014). Abstract:

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Leave a comment

MA: Emergency aid exception applies to animals in distress

The emergency aid exception to the warrant requirement applies to life-threatening emergencies involving animals. The legislature has made it clear that animal abuse is against the law. “In addition to promoting life-saving measures, the ability to render such assistance vindicates … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on MA: Emergency aid exception applies to animals in distress

New format

Notice the new format, in WordPress, after ten days of converting data. After the crash a few weeks ago, we found we could transport all the old posts to WordPress. Earlier, it wasn’t economically feasible, and now it was. Sunday’s … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

OR: No RS for frisk; defendant made no furtive movements and asked why the need for a search

The officer lacked reasonable suspicion that defendant was armed to justify a frisk. Defendant, inter alia, made no furtive movements, and asked why the officers had to search him and his demeanor changed when it came up. Nothing here indicates … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Leave a comment

BLT: D.C. Magistrate Judge Sets Up Showdown Over Cellphone Data

BLT: D.C. Magistrate Judge Sets Up Showdown Over Cellphone Data by Zoe Tillman:

Posted in Cell phones | Leave a comment

NYT: Adding Insult to Gun Injuries, Police Often Handcuff [Shooting] Victims

NYT: Adding Insult to Gun Injuries, Police Often Handcuff [Shooting] Victims by Joseph Goldstein:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

TN: 911 shooting call was exigency that included EMTs and CSIs

911 call about a shooting at 1:23 am, and “He’s in here” when they arrive justifies an emergency entry. [Certainly sounds like consent, too.] The real issue, however, is whether that also includes EMTs who follow and CSIs, and the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

OH2: Motion to suppress raised legality of stop; error to decide length of detention without notice to state

The motion to suppress addressed only the legality of the stop, and it didn’t mention the post-stop detention. The state was, therefore, not prepared to defend on that ground, and the trial court erred in deciding that ground without notice … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Leave a comment

W.D.N.Y.: Warrant for everything on a cell phone (“text-messages, videos, photos, records of internet usage and movement tracking information”) dealing with one day and a particular crime at least good under GFE

The government sought a warrant for everything on a cell phone (“text-messages, videos, photos, records of internet usage and movement tracking information”) dealing with one day and a particular crime, so the warrant was not necessarily overbroad. The overbreadth issue … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Overbreadth | Leave a comment

CA11: 13 month old information of possession of a firearm is not stale

13 month old information of possession of a firearm is not stale. “Unlawful possession of a firearm is an ongoing crime, so ‘old’ information is relevant to the question of present probable cause. Additionally, unlike narcotics, firearms are not consumable … Continue reading

Posted in Staleness | Leave a comment

WaPo: N.Y. search warrant case shows why we need the Exclusionary Rule

WaPo: N.Y. search warrant case shows why we need the Exclusionary Rule by Radley Balko:

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

NY3: Warrant requirement in rental inspection ordinance made it constitutional

The rental unit inspection ordinance is not unconstitutional. It provides a warrant procedure if the owner refuses consent. “As the inclusion of the warrant requirement is sufficient to safeguard plaintiff’s constitutional rights, his challenge to the facial validity of the … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Border search, Staleness | Comments Off on NY3: Warrant requirement in rental inspection ordinance made it constitutional

WY: Affidavit for SW for blood draw in felony DUI was conclusory that defendant was even the driver

The affidavit for defendant’s BAC in this felony DUI case was order suppressed on appeal because it offered bare conclusions that defendant was the driver of the car. On what was presented to the issuing magistrate, it was completely lacking. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Leave a comment