Daily Archives: April 16, 2014

W.D.Tex.: While Jardines rule violated, there was other PC so no suppression

There was a dog sniff at defendant’s house, and Jardines would apply, except that there was plenty of probable cause here without the dog sniff. Therefore, excluding that fact from the case, there was still probable cause for the search … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: While Jardines rule violated, there was other PC so no suppression

M.D.Tenn.: Warrantless seizure of text message from cell phone valid under GFE

Without a case in point, warrantless seizure of a text message from a cell phone which was Overt Act 8 in the indictment was not unreasonable under the good faith exception. Defendant relies on Wurie, which is from the First … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Warrantless seizure of text message from cell phone valid under GFE

WaPo: Volokh: Choosing between ‘never search’ and ‘sometimes search’ in the cell phone search cases

WaPo: Volokh: Choosing between ‘never search’ and ‘sometimes search’ in the cell phone search cases by Orin Kerr: This is the hardest issue that the Supreme Court must decide in trying to determine how the Fourth Amendment applies to search … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on WaPo: Volokh: Choosing between ‘never search’ and ‘sometimes search’ in the cell phone search cases

CA11: Pre-Jones GPS valid by good faith exception

Because there was clear precedent that GPS monitoring before Jones was valid, and at least by the Davis good faith exception, the GPS here was valid, too. During the pendency of this appeal, other cases so held. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA11: Pre-Jones GPS valid by good faith exception

E.D.Mich.: Government’s motion to compel fingerprinting of person in custody on indictment granted

The government’s motion to compel fingerprinting of a person in lawful custody on an indictment is granted. There is no Fifth or Fourth Amendment right involved. United States v. Adams, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51735 (E.D. Mich. April 15, 2014):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Government’s motion to compel fingerprinting of person in custody on indictment granted

CA3: Arrest 20′ outside house didn’t permit search of house without more

Defendant was arrested 20′ outside his house, so a search incident of the house was invalid. Viewed as protective sweep of the house, the district court erred in applying Buie’s “prong 2” because there was no finding of necessity. Remanded. … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA3: Arrest 20′ outside house didn’t permit search of house without more