Daily Archives: April 30, 2014

SCOTUSBlog: Argument analysis: Limiting a search? Sure, but how?

SCOTUSBlog: Argument analysis: Limiting a search? Sure, but how? by Lyle Denniston: Trying to imagine all of the things that an individual might keep stored on a cellphone, and trying to decide how much privacy – if any – each … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Argument analysis: Limiting a search? Sure, but how?

Legal Intelligencer: State Justices Say Telephones Exempt From Wiretap Act

Legal Intelligencer: State Justices Say Telephones Exempt From Wiretap Act: Holding that telephones are expressly exempt from the devices prohibited by the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act regardless of how they’re used, the state Supreme Court has ruled … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Legal Intelligencer: State Justices Say Telephones Exempt From Wiretap Act

Reason.com: Man Rousted at Gunpoint After License Plate Scanner Misreads Plate

Reason.com: Man Rousted at Gunpoint After License Plate Scanner Misreads Plate by J.D. Tuccille: One of the downsides of all of the new gee-whiz identification technology law enforcement is adopting (usually with hefty federal subsidies) is that it never works … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Reason.com: Man Rousted at Gunpoint After License Plate Scanner Misreads Plate

PA declines to have broader state constitutional rights under the automobile exception

Pennsylvania declines to have broader state constitutional rights under the automobile exception. (No sign it was going to before.) Commonwealth v. Gary, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1119 (April 29, 2014) (concurrence; dissent):

Posted in Automobile exception, State constitution | Comments Off on PA declines to have broader state constitutional rights under the automobile exception

CA4: Having no keys and breaking in through window belies apparent authority to consent

Officers came to plaintiff’s house with his former girlfriend who they contend consented to the entry. She, however, had no key to the house and they broke in through a window. Plaintiff stated a § 1983 claim because it wasn’t … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on CA4: Having no keys and breaking in through window belies apparent authority to consent

CA6: Computer search condition for supervised release was justified

The District Court gave specific reasons why it was subjecting defendant to a computer search condition on supervised release, and it is both valid and reasonable. (Distinguishing United States v. Inman, 666 F.3d 1001 (6th Cir. 2012) where there were … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Computer and cloud searches, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA6: Computer search condition for supervised release was justified

E.D.N.Y.: Custodial arrest for littering supported search incident

Police responded to a 911 call and saw defendant, who appeared to be wearing body armor, throw a food wrapper on the ground. They arrested him for littering and took him in. The search incident of the body armor was … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Custodial arrest for littering supported search incident

Wurie and Riley: The two most important privacy cases of the decade; press is underwhelmed

WaPo: Justices wary of unlimited cellphone searches by AP: WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court seemed wary Tuesday of allowing police unbridled freedom to search through cellphones of people they arrest, taking on a new issue of privacy in the face … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Wurie and Riley: The two most important privacy cases of the decade; press is underwhelmed