Daily Archives: April 11, 2014

WaPo: N.Y. search warrant case shows why we need the Exclusionary Rule

WaPo: N.Y. search warrant case shows why we need the Exclusionary Rule by Radley Balko:

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

NY3: Warrant requirement in rental inspection ordinance made it constitutional

The rental unit inspection ordinance is not unconstitutional. It provides a warrant procedure if the owner refuses consent. “As the inclusion of the warrant requirement is sufficient to safeguard plaintiff’s constitutional rights, his challenge to the facial validity of the … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Border search, Staleness | Comments Off on NY3: Warrant requirement in rental inspection ordinance made it constitutional

WY: Affidavit for SW for blood draw in felony DUI was conclusory that defendant was even the driver

The affidavit for defendant’s BAC in this felony DUI case was order suppressed on appeal because it offered bare conclusions that defendant was the driver of the car. On what was presented to the issuing magistrate, it was completely lacking. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Leave a comment

LA5: Controlled buy from house is PC for SW

A CI called police and said that he could buy crack from a man with tattoos on his face. They set up a controlled buy out of defendant’s house. That was probable cause for a search warrant. State v. Young, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CA10: Sweatshorts with gun in pocket held abandoned

Defendant was found to have abandoned his sweatshorts which had a gun in the pocket. United States v. Mosley, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 6500 (10th Cir. April 9, 2014).* Officers told defendant they wanted to search his cell phone for … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CA5: Prison inmate stated claim for harassing strip searches

Plaintiff prison inmate filed a “§ 1983 complaint in which he contended that he was forced to undergo strip and visual body cavity searches without reasonable justification.” He stated a Fourth Amendment claim so reversed and remanded. Scheidel v. Sec’y … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA5: Prison inmate stated claim for harassing strip searches

WaPo: Volokh: The need for computer-specific Fourth Amendment rules in the cell phone search cases

WaPo: Volokh: The need for computer-specific Fourth Amendment rules in the cell phone search cases by Orin Kerr:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment