Category Archives: Probation / Parole search

NY3: No exigency justified this entry; exclusionary rule applies in NY probation revo proceedings

There was no emergency basis for entry into defendant’s apartment, a probationer. The police understood that another person might be there who they were curious about. Still, there was no justification for the warrantless entry with gun drawn at midnight. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY3: No exigency justified this entry; exclusionary rule applies in NY probation revo proceedings

D.S.D.: Pole camera surveillance was troubling, but for def being on supervised release with a reduced REP

Pole camera surveillance of defendant may have been intrusive, and the court is sensitive to the ability of a pole camera to invade on privacy, but this case turns on defendant being on supervised release with a lower expectation of … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Pole camera surveillance was troubling, but for def being on supervised release with a reduced REP

N.D.W.Va.: No standing in car where permission to borrow had been revoked

Defendant had permission to possess and drive a car for a while, but it had been rescinded by the time of the search. Therefore, he lacked standing in the car. United States v. Leclear, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106550 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: No standing in car where permission to borrow had been revoked

N.D.Fla.: Email SW didn’t required search protocol be stated in SW

“The officers followed a reasonable protocol in conducting the search. The protocol was not in the warrant, but this did not render the warrant defective. See United States v. Khanani, 502 F.3d 1281, 1290 (11th Cir. 2007). And in any … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: Email SW didn’t required search protocol be stated in SW

KS: A field sobriety test is not a search.

A field sobriety test is not a search. Even if it was, this was shown to be by consent. City of Leawood v. Puccinelli, 2018 Kan. App. LEXIS 35 (June 22, 2018). This heading in the too long opinion explains … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on KS: A field sobriety test is not a search.

N.D.Cal.: Def’s parole search on erroneous dispatch report def was on parole means no exclusion under Herring

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and dispatch said he was on parole which meant he was subject to search. He wasn’t on parole, but the officer’s good faith reliance on the dispatch report under Herring means no suppression. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Def’s parole search on erroneous dispatch report def was on parole means no exclusion under Herring

SC: Failure to register offense didn’t justify electronic monitoring condition under Grady

Defendant was convicted of a sex offense in 1979. In 2011 he was convicted of a sex offender registration offense. An electronic monitoring condition was unreasonable and a violation of the Fourth Amendment on this record under Grady v. North … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on SC: Failure to register offense didn’t justify electronic monitoring condition under Grady

D.Idaho: Consent irrelevant to a parole search

Defendant was reasonably subjected to a parole search, and withdrawal of his consent was irrelevant. United States v. Perales, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99191 (D. Idaho June 11, 2018). The officer had reasonable suspicion to detain defendant for being a … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Consent irrelevant to a parole search

S.D.N.Y.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to revocation of supervised release

The exclusionary rule does not apply to revocation of supervised release proceedings. United States v. Hightower, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98320 (S.D. N.Y. June 12, 2018). The renter of the rental car was in it, and he voluntarily consented to … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to revocation of supervised release

Cal.1: Electronic search condition on juvenile was unreasonable for possession of a knife and rolling papers at school

The electronic search condition on this juvenile for having a knife, rolling papers, and a lighter in school after a school search was unreasonable. The state says its need to prevent him from procuring more marijuana, but the court disagrees. … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on Cal.1: Electronic search condition on juvenile was unreasonable for possession of a knife and rolling papers at school

LA5: Parole officers were stalking horses for police acting without RS

Defendant’s parole search was without reasonable suspicion. In addition, the parole officers were acting at the request of law enforcement officers acting on an unsubstantiated tip, and that’s unreasonable in this state. State v. Clay, 2018 La. App. LEXIS 1004 … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on LA5: Parole officers were stalking horses for police acting without RS

KS: Parole search waiver permitted suspicionless home searches

Defendant’s parole search waiver permitted suspicionless searches of his home, despite the fact the statute didn’t specifically mention it. The court balances the state’s need with the intrusion on privacy, and there is a continuum of much lower privacy expectations … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on KS: Parole search waiver permitted suspicionless home searches

NC: On remand from Grady, realtime satellite based monitoring of a sex offender on release was unreasonable under 4A

On remand from Grady v. North Carolina, 135 S. Ct. 1368, 191 L. Ed. 2d 459 (2015), the state failed to prove that continuous realtime satellite based monitoring of defendant was unreasonable. The lack of a warrant requirement without any … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NC: On remand from Grady, realtime satellite based monitoring of a sex offender on release was unreasonable under 4A

Cal.1st: Cell phone probation search condition not unreasonable; def to rid self of gang affiliations

An electronic search condition of probation is not per se unreasonable under Riley. Here, it was reasonable to show whether defendant ridded himself of his gang affiliations which was a condition of probation. People v. Guzman, 2018 Cal. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.1st: Cell phone probation search condition not unreasonable; def to rid self of gang affiliations

S.D.Ohio: Riley‘s cell phone SW requirement doesn’t apply to probation searches of a cell phone

Riley does not require a warrant for a probation search of a probationer’s cell phone. United States v. Fletcher, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65591 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 18, 2018). Officers had probable cause to search the trunk of a car … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Riley‘s cell phone SW requirement doesn’t apply to probation searches of a cell phone

S.D.N.Y.: Parole search was valid despite def being in jail at time

Defendant was on parole and allegedly shot at somebody. That justified a parole search of his residence. The fact he was in jail at the time didn’t matter. United States v. Jaiman, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64797 (S.D. N.Y. Apr. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Parole search was valid despite def being in jail at time

CA1: Suppression motion was untimely without a showing of good cause, and it would not be determined on appeal

“Sweeney neither challenged the finding of untimeliness before the district court, nor does he now argue that his delay in filing the motion to suppress was excused by good cause. As such, because of his waiver, we need not address … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA1: Suppression motion was untimely without a showing of good cause, and it would not be determined on appeal

E.D.Mich.: No PC for the warrant, but it wasn’t “so lacking” in PC that the GFE wouldn’t apply

There was no probable cause for issuance of the search warrant, but it wasn’t “so lacking” in probable cause because there was at least something. “The officers, therefore, acted in good faith in executing the warrant because, although the affidavit … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No PC for the warrant, but it wasn’t “so lacking” in PC that the GFE wouldn’t apply

Cal.5: Detaining visiting non-probationer during probation search was unreasonable

Defendant was visiting a friend when the friend’s PO showed up for an unannounced search. Defendant was detained, too. His detention was unreasonable. People v. Gutierrez, 2018 Cal. App. LEXIS 282 (5th Dist. Mar. 29, 2018). This defendant challenged the … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.5: Detaining visiting non-probationer during probation search was unreasonable

CA7: State’s use of state’s “John Doe” proceedings was shown to be in good faith

In the court’s second view of Wisconsin’s unique John Doe proceedings, the Seventh Circuit decides only the good faith exception and concludes that the reliance on state law and compliance with the Stored Communications Act was all in good faith. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: State’s use of state’s “John Doe” proceedings was shown to be in good faith