S.D.N.Y.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to revocation of supervised release

The exclusionary rule does not apply to revocation of supervised release proceedings. United States v. Hightower, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98320 (S.D. N.Y. June 12, 2018).

The renter of the rental car was in it, and he voluntarily consented to the search of the car. United States v. Johnson, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97504 (D. Neb. June 11, 2018).*

Police received an anonymous call of reckless driving, and the officers found the vehicle and watched for 20-25 seconds, and there were multiple indications that the car was operating recklessly. Thus, the stop was valid. State v. Yallah, 2018-Ohio-2251, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 2433 (11th Cir. June 11, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.