Category Archives: State constitution

OR: Officer pulled into gas station behind defendant and made him talk, thereby making it a stop

Defendant pulled into a gas station, gassed up, and bought a drink. When he came out, a police car was parked behind him, and the officer required him to talk about the reason for the “stop.” This became a stop … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Officer pulled into gas station behind defendant and made him talk, thereby making it a stop

PA decision that CI’s recording inside a house required a warrant affirmed by equally divided court

In 2013, Pennsylvania Superior Court held that the state constitution prohibits warrantless taping inside a suspect’s home with a video camera planted on an informant. Commonwealth v. Dunnavant, 2013 PA Super 38, 63 A.3d 1252 (2013) (posted here). That decision … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on PA decision that CI’s recording inside a house required a warrant affirmed by equally divided court

Bloomberg: In Rare State Move, Wyoming May Add Individual Right to Privacy to Constitution

Bloomberg: In Rare State Move, Wyoming May Add Individual Right to Privacy to Constitution by Tripp Baltz: Dec. 18 — Other states may want to follow Wyoming lawmakers, who in early 2015 will consider a proposed constitutional amendment (15LSO-0066) that … Continue reading

Posted in State constitution | Comments Off on Bloomberg: In Rare State Move, Wyoming May Add Individual Right to Privacy to Constitution

MA: Arrest on recalled warrant suppressed under state const. where officers violated policy and didn’t recheck

Product of an arrest on a recently recalled warrant suppressed under the state constitution. The police had plenty of time to check the status of the warrant during the hours of surveillance looking for defendant and waiting for him to … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule, State constitution | Comments Off on MA: Arrest on recalled warrant suppressed under state const. where officers violated policy and didn’t recheck

Cal.1: Taking DNA from an arrestee violates the California Constitution; Maryland v. King distinguished

California’s Constitution and DNA statute is different than Maryland’s in Maryland v. King so taking DNA from an arrestee is unconstitutional. People v. Buza, 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 1100 (1st Dist. December 3, 2014):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Informational privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on Cal.1: Taking DNA from an arrestee violates the California Constitution; Maryland v. King distinguished

IN: “No Trespassing” sign and cable across driveway defined curtilage under state constitution; entry required warrant

“No Trespassing” signs used to be not determinative of curtilage. It’s apparent they are becoming so. Here, the defendant had a cable across the driveway, a “No Trespassing” sign, and a surveillance camera. The police were not in hot pursuit … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, State constitution | Comments Off on IN: “No Trespassing” sign and cable across driveway defined curtilage under state constitution; entry required warrant

IA: Iowa requires a search warrant for a probation search

Iowa requires a search warrant for a probation search. State v. Sacco, 2014 Iowa App. LEXIS 945 (October 1, 2014): The State asserts the legality of the search at issue here is “controlled by Griffin.” In regard only to Sacco’s … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, State constitution | Comments Off on IA: Iowa requires a search warrant for a probation search

IN still doesn’t recognize the attenuation doctrine

The attenuation doctrine does not apply to violations of the Indiana Constitution. Admittedly, the search of defendant’s vehicle was unlawful, and a receipt found was followed back to video of the transaction. Indiana hasn’t yet adopted inevitable discovery under the … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, State constitution | Comments Off on IN still doesn’t recognize the attenuation doctrine

TN: Arrival of a police squad with arrest warrants was a “seizure” despite defendant’s flight

Several police cars from Knoxville PD pulled up at a house with arrest warrants for people known to hang out there. Defendant saw them and fled and was pursued. The arrival of that many police was a “seizure” under the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, State constitution | Comments Off on TN: Arrival of a police squad with arrest warrants was a “seizure” despite defendant’s flight

IN: Refuses to find any reasonable expectation of privacy in telephone records under state constitution

Defendant didn’t pursue an interlocutory appeal of his suppression motion on telephone records being seized in violation of the state constitution. Therefore, he waived it by objecting at trial. Nevertheless, the court finds that he would lose on the state … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, State constitution, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IN: Refuses to find any reasonable expectation of privacy in telephone records under state constitution

IA rejects SCOTUS probation and parole search exception on state constitution

On state constitutional grounds, Iowa refuses to follow SCOTUS on probation and parole searches. A search warrant is required without consent. “For the above reasons, we think Cullison remains good law. We decline to overrule it. The United States Supreme … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, State constitution | Comments Off on IA rejects SCOTUS probation and parole search exception on state constitution

VT: Pre-conviction DNA testing of arrestees after arraignment violates the search provision of state constitution

In a comprehensive opinion, the Vermont Supreme Court held Friday that pre-conviction DNA testing of arrestees after arraignment violates the search provision of the Vermont Constitution. It failed every point of analysis. State v. Medina, 2014 VT 69, 2014 Vt. … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, State constitution | Comments Off on VT: Pre-conviction DNA testing of arrestees after arraignment violates the search provision of state constitution

OR: Ordering defendant out of his house for an FST was a “stop” and detention as a show of authority

Ordering defendant out of his house for a FST was a “stop” and detention under the state constitution because it was a show of authority. State v. Charles, 263 Or. App. ___, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 804 (June 18, 2014). … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Motion to suppress, Particularity, State constitution, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OR: Ordering defendant out of his house for an FST was a “stop” and detention as a show of authority

Cal.2d: State pharmacy controlled substance database doesn’t violate patients’ privacy rights

A patient does not have a substantial enough state constitutional privacy right to overcome the public interest in making prescription controlled substances records inspections at pharmacies. Pharmacies are highly regulated, and there are sufficient other general protections of patient information. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on Cal.2d: State pharmacy controlled substance database doesn’t violate patients’ privacy rights

E.D.Ky.: A line by line dissection of a search warrant affidavit is inappropriate

A line by line dissection of a search warrant affidavit is inappropriate; what does it say as a whole with a common sense reading. “Brummett’s interpretation strains linguistic reality.” It was not so lacking in probable cause that the exclusionary … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: A line by line dissection of a search warrant affidavit is inappropriate

PA declines to have broader state constitutional rights under the automobile exception

Pennsylvania declines to have broader state constitutional rights under the automobile exception. (No sign it was going to before.) Commonwealth v. Gary, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1119 (April 29, 2014) (concurrence; dissent):

Posted in Automobile exception, State constitution | Comments Off on PA declines to have broader state constitutional rights under the automobile exception