Category Archives: Informant hearsay

E.D.Tenn.: Detail alone in hearsay from an untested informant is not enough to make probable cause

With an untested and unknown informant, detail alone is not enough because detail can be made up, too. Thus, this affidavit lacks probable cause. Nevertheless, the good faith exception will sustain it. United States v. Martin, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Detail alone in hearsay from an untested informant is not enough to make probable cause

N.D.Ga.: Def’s failure to respond to gov’t’s questioning his standing was waiver

Defendant has the burden of establishing standing. At the hearing, the government contested standing, and defendant didn’t respond or brief it. Therefore, standing was waived. United States v. Tolbert, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71047 (N.D.Ga. April 30, 2015).* Probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Def’s failure to respond to gov’t’s questioning his standing was waiver

D.Neb.: CI’s significant information was corroborated, albeit innocent in itself

Officers independently corroborated the CI and that made the CI reliable. The fact they were innocent were still significant things that proved correct. Their observations were also consistent with drug transactions. United States v. De La Torre-Casas, 2015 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Neb.: CI’s significant information was corroborated, albeit innocent in itself

MS: Uncorroborated informant hearsay was so clearly deficient that the good faith exception did not apply

The informant hearsay in this was a mere uncorroborated statement with no basis of knowledge that the defendant was involved in creating a bogus Facebook account for another person as identity theft. A judge went ahead and signed off on … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on MS: Uncorroborated informant hearsay was so clearly deficient that the good faith exception did not apply

MS: Unknown and uncorroborated CI was woefully insufficient

CI was unknown to the officer and he had no information on the CI’s basis of knowledge nor did he corroborate anything. The motion to suppress should have been granted. Chesney v. State, 2015 Miss. App. LEXIS 277 (May 19, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: Unknown and uncorroborated CI was woefully insufficient

KY: Defendant who refused consent for blood test and got no breath test has no Fourth Amendment claim that he wasn’t breath tested

Defendant was stopped for traffic offenses and smelled of alcohol. He refused consent to search his blood for his BAC, and the officer did not offer him a breath test. Thus, he had no “standing” because of no injury in … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KY: Defendant who refused consent for blood test and got no breath test has no Fourth Amendment claim that he wasn’t breath tested

OH10: Emergency or hot pursuit didn’t justify entry during knock-and-talk

Bike patrol officers smelled burning marijuana, and that led to them to a hotel room. When they knocked, defendant opened the door and they barged in. The entry was unlawful and couldn’t be sustained under any emergency or hot pursuit … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Knock and talk, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH10: Emergency or hot pursuit didn’t justify entry during knock-and-talk

KS: Controlled delivery doesn’t have to be hand-to-hand; picking up package from porch and taking it inside is enough

Defendant didn’t raise probable cause from the triggering event in an anticipatory warrant, but the suppression judge did. He directed the parties to litigate and brief it, so the issue was properly before the court. The triggering condition was acceptance … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on KS: Controlled delivery doesn’t have to be hand-to-hand; picking up package from porch and taking it inside is enough

W.D.N.Y.: CI actually questioned by judge issuing SW was entitled to more credit

There was good reason to credit the CI here: he was actually questioned by the issuing judge and the information clearly added up to probable cause. The court credits the officers that the search did not start until one hour … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: CI actually questioned by judge issuing SW was entitled to more credit

SC: When responding to a tip of drug activity in the back yard for a knock-and-talk, it’s reasonable to go to the backyard where all the people seemed to be [Update: Rev’d 12/21/16]

Officers got an anonymous tip of drug activity in the backyard at a particular house. They could drive on the street near the house and see people in the backyard. They went to do a knock-and-talk and went to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on SC: When responding to a tip of drug activity in the back yard for a knock-and-talk, it’s reasonable to go to the backyard where all the people seemed to be [Update: Rev’d 12/21/16]

TX7: Riley applied to cell phone search incident where it came down between trial and appeal

Search incident cannot support a cell phone search under Riley. Riley came down between trial and appeal, so it applies here because the issue was preserved. Carter v. State, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 4271 (Tex. App. – Amarillo April 27, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on TX7: Riley applied to cell phone search incident where it came down between trial and appeal

IN: Flight from car is abandonment of the cell phone inside, too

Defendant’s flight from his car and into the woods was an abandonment of the car and the contents. Thus, the warrantless search of his cell phone left in the car was reasonable. Harrison v. State, 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 357 … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on IN: Flight from car is abandonment of the cell phone inside, too

E.D.La.: A power co. had standing to challenge overbroad subpoenas at a gov’t audit

A power company stated an injury-in-fact for standing to contest the agency’s action on, inter alia, Fourth Amendment grounds that its request for production of records in an audit constituted a likely Fourth Amendment violation for an overbroad or oppressive … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on E.D.La.: A power co. had standing to challenge overbroad subpoenas at a gov’t audit

OH2: Anonymous tip of shooting was corroborated enough by witnesses at scene

The anonymous tip defendant was involved in a shooting was corroborated by people at the scene who pointed to defendant’s house and blood drops outside, and it led to a fair inference that the shooter or a victim was inside. … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on OH2: Anonymous tip of shooting was corroborated enough by witnesses at scene

GA: Anonymous informant not corroborated by misd possession of small amount of pot and a gun

“On appeal, Wiggins contends that the search warrant was invalid because the supporting affidavit—which relied solely on an uncorroborated tip from an anonymous informant [he was moving 50 pds a week], Wiggins’s possession of a personal-use amount of marijuana, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on GA: Anonymous informant not corroborated by misd possession of small amount of pot and a gun

MS: Anonymous tip for a DUI stop was insufficient without corroboration

Anonymous tip for a DUI stop was insufficient without corroboration. Cook v. State, 2015 Miss. LEXIS 130 (March 12, 2015), revg Cook v. Rankin County, 140 So. 3d 940 (Miss. App. Dec. 3, 2013) (unpublished):

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on MS: Anonymous tip for a DUI stop was insufficient without corroboration

E.D.Mich.: Where parole search required RS, anonymous tip consistent with other violation information was enough

A parole search under Michigan law only requires reasonable suspicion. An anonymous tip in the past has been held not enough. Here, however, the anonymous telephone tip was consistent with some of defendant’s parole violations, so here it’s enough. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Where parole search required RS, anonymous tip consistent with other violation information was enough

D.Minn.: Just arrested snitch was corroborated enough to be believable for PC purposes

The CI was recently arrested in this investigation, and, while he had no track record, his tale was sufficiently corroborated by other information that had been developed to make him believable enough for probable cause. United States v. Arballo, 2015 … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Informant hearsay, State constitution | Tagged | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Just arrested snitch was corroborated enough to be believable for PC purposes

Word Salad for Law Enforcement: Confidential Human Source (“CHS”), adopted by some courts

Confidential Human Source (“CHS”) v. Confidential Informant (“CI”) v. Citizen Informant (Citizen Informant) v. Snitch (Snitch) “Confidential Human Source (CHS)” appears to have started about 2003, but it’s been more popular of late in the federal system. I’ve seen it … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on Word Salad for Law Enforcement: Confidential Human Source (“CHS”), adopted by some courts

IN: CI was uncorroborated and his information old; no PC or GFE

The CI’s statement here was uncorroborated and 3-4 months old. Thus, the search warrant lacked probable cause and it was so lacking in probable cause, that the good faith exception cannot apply. Cartwright v. State, 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 107 … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Staleness | Comments Off on IN: CI was uncorroborated and his information old; no PC or GFE