Category Archives: Standing

OH2: Def’s denial of possessory interest in car at suppression hearing denies him standing

“During the suppression hearing, Williamson specifically disclaimed a possessory interest in the Chrysler 300” so he didn’t have standing. State v. Williamson, 2017-Ohio-7098, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 3217 (2d Dist. Aug. 4, 2017). (Shades of Rawlings v. Kentucky where the … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on OH2: Def’s denial of possessory interest in car at suppression hearing denies him standing

NY1: Staying “on and off” with an uncle for many years, getting mail there, storing all his clothes there gave standing

The trial court erred in finding that defendant lacked standing to challenge the propriety of the search of the apartment because defendant’s uncle, who resided in the apartment, told the police that defendant had stayed with his family “on and … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Standing | Comments Off on NY1: Staying “on and off” with an uncle for many years, getting mail there, storing all his clothes there gave standing

N.D.Ga. predicts CA11 would go with totality standard in standing in a borrowed rented car

Noting the different approaches of the circuits to the standing of a driver of a rental car who is not on the contract but operating with permission of the renter, the totality of circumstances test is adopted, and he lacks … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga. predicts CA11 would go with totality standard in standing in a borrowed rented car

S.D.N.Y.: Seizure of months of CSLI was proper to connect def to a particular place

Months of historical CSLI, rather than just three day’s worth, was properly acquired by the government to show defendant’s connections to the property at issue. The third party doctrine provides defendant no relief [yet]. United States v. Serrano, 2017 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Seizure of months of CSLI was proper to connect def to a particular place

PA: Unreasonable stop voids subsequent search even for a passenger otherwise without standing

The initial illegality of an unreasonable stop taints the following search whether the defendant has standing in the car or not. Commonwealth v. Shabezz, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 1691 (July 19, 2017):

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on PA: Unreasonable stop voids subsequent search even for a passenger otherwise without standing

CT: Def didn’t satisfy guest standing, and co-conspirator standing rejected

Defendant lacked standing to challenge the search of a grow operation because it wasn’t his place. The fact there were a couple of pieces of mail and one piece of personal property at the place, without more, didn’t show how … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on CT: Def didn’t satisfy guest standing, and co-conspirator standing rejected

D.Vt.: Payton doesn’t require an arrest warrant come with a SW

Payton does not require that an arrest warrant also be obtained to arrest a suspect during the execution of a search warrant on his premises. Defendant was lawfully arrested in the house when the search warrant was executed. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Standing | Comments Off on D.Vt.: Payton doesn’t require an arrest warrant come with a SW

LA: “Defendant thus was in the difficult position of having to both distance himself from the barbeque grill, if he hoped to be found not guilty of possession of the cocaine found inside it, and tie himself more closely to the grill, if he hoped to obtain a favorable ruling on the motion to suppress. Trying to do both, he succeeded at neither.”

Showing a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched but denying possession is a fine line indeed. Show too much of an expectation of privacy just to challenge the search [always a risky proposition] and you might put yourself … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on LA: “Defendant thus was in the difficult position of having to both distance himself from the barbeque grill, if he hoped to be found not guilty of possession of the cocaine found inside it, and tie himself more closely to the grill, if he hoped to obtain a favorable ruling on the motion to suppress. Trying to do both, he succeeded at neither.”

CA9: Intervenors show no standing to challenge admin. SDT to Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program

Intervenors showed no Art. III standing to challenge the DEA’s administrative subpoenas to the Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program. Art. III standing requires that they show independent standing to sue. Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program v. United States Drug Enforcement … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA9: Intervenors show no standing to challenge admin. SDT to Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program

GA: No standing in phone subscriber records to a phone that’s not in his name

Defendant consented to giving his phone to the police. During his interview, he picked up the phone and was manipulating it, and the officers took it away from him until they could get a search warrant. This was reasonable [and … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on GA: No standing in phone subscriber records to a phone that’s not in his name

D.P.R.: Secondary border inspection of def’s cell phone for evidence of dog fighting was reasonable

Defendant’s alleged fighting dogs and his cell phone were validly the subject of secondary border inspections in San Juan. United States v. Castro-Correa, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90966 (D.P.R. June 12, 2017).* Defendant didn’t have standing to challenge the search … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Secondary border inspection of def’s cell phone for evidence of dog fighting was reasonable

PA: Having hotel room key without anyone being registered in room doesn’t show standing

Defendant in speaking to the police said that he was staying in 111 of the Knights Inn hotel, and he showed a key card. When the officer turned away the key was hidden in the car. Later the police retrieved … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on PA: Having hotel room key without anyone being registered in room doesn’t show standing

D.N.M.: Where search of backpacks in car was unreasonable, each def only had standing as to his own bag

Defendants were involved in a rollover accident on a New Mexico interstate highway. Another person came to pick them up after they called. The officer on the scene insisted on searching each of the bags that they pulled out of … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Where search of backpacks in car was unreasonable, each def only had standing as to his own bag

OH6: Merely being “associated” with a vehicle doesn’t confer standing

“In his motion to suppress, he asserted only that he was ‘associated’ with the truck. We find an ‘association’ with the vehicle gives no greater rights than a mere passenger. Therefore, we agree with the state that appellant could not … Continue reading →

Posted in Standards of review, Standing | Comments Off on OH6: Merely being “associated” with a vehicle doesn’t confer standing

CA4: Wikimedia can show standing to challenge internet surveillance under Clapper v. Amesty International

Wikimedia’s complaint against the NSA survives SCOTUS Clapper v. Amnesty International standing analysis. Wikimedia handles over one trillion internet communications a year, and every internet portal in the U.S. and likely the world reaches it. Therefore, some communications have to … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Standing | Comments Off on CA4: Wikimedia can show standing to challenge internet surveillance under Clapper v. Amesty International

TN: Def’s disclaimer of interest in apartment he was in denied him standing

The trial court credited the officer’s testimony that defendant said that he could not consent to a search of the apartment he was in because it wasn’t his residence. That meant he lacked standing. The police came there expecting it … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on TN: Def’s disclaimer of interest in apartment he was in denied him standing

OH5: Def without DL and not on rental agreement as authorized driver had no standing

Defendant never had a DL, and he was driving a rental car and wasn’t on the paperwork as an authorized driver, so the renter had no authority to let him drive. Therefore, he lacked standing. State v. Nicholson, 2017-Ohio-2825, 2017 … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Standing, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OH5: Def without DL and not on rental agreement as authorized driver had no standing

E.D.Mich.: Affidavit for SW and other things showed def’s standing in two cell phones

The search warrant affidavit showed defendant’s standing in two cell phones that were seized. The phones were referred to as belonging to defendant, and she claimed them when asked about them but disclaimed ownership in others. Finally, she proffered that … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Affidavit for SW and other things showed def’s standing in two cell phones

CA2: Unlicensed driver of rental car rented by another had no standing in car

The court does not have to decide whether the unauthorized driver of a rental car as to the rental contract has standing, despite being loaned the car by the renter, noting differing authorities; because defendant was also an unlicensed driver … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA2: Unlicensed driver of rental car rented by another had no standing in car

C.D.Ill.: Long term borrower of car has standing

One who borrows a car for a long time has standing. “And the Court is persuaded that society is prepared to accept as reasonable a person’s subjective expectation of privacy in a car borrowed for months on end from a … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Long term borrower of car has standing