Category Archives: Apparent authority

CA11: Def’s silence when driver was asked to consent to search of a bag on passenger side floorboard was apparent authority

Defendant had standing to contest the search of his bag in a car, even though he wouldn’t have standing in the rest of the car. The driver had apparent authority to consent to a search of the bag and it … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Def’s silence when driver was asked to consent to search of a bag on passenger side floorboard was apparent authority

CA7: Ptfs adequately pled that officers searched house without consent from 14 year old

At the pleading stage, plaintiffs adequately pled that officers told a 14 girl that they had to search the house, she ran upstairs with her brother, and the officers did so without a warrant. There is no consent on the … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA7: Ptfs adequately pled that officers searched house without consent from 14 year old

GA: No apparent authority to consent to search of roommate’s locked bedroom door where no key

Defendant lived with his uncle, and he kept the door to his bedroom locked. The officers could not objectively rely on the uncle’s consent where he had no key, and officers had to use a knife to jimmy the door … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on GA: No apparent authority to consent to search of roommate’s locked bedroom door where no key

E.D.Tenn.: Using def’s cell phone to call 911 to obtain its number did not violate Riley

The use of defendant’s cell phone to call 911 to obtain its number did not violate Riley, and, even so, was within the good faith exception. United States v. Caldwell, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4279 (E.D. Tenn. January 14, 2015), … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Using def’s cell phone to call 911 to obtain its number did not violate Riley

CA6: Def deferred consent to his mother, and her’s was voluntary

Defendant deferred the question to consent to search his place to his mother with whom he lived. She validly and promptly consented to the officers’ request, and it was all voluntary. United States v. Gossett, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 417, … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Def deferred consent to his mother, and her’s was voluntary

PA: Occupant of house lacked authority to consent to search intended guest’s luggage

Defendant left luggage and a shaving kit at his girlfriend’s apartment because he was coming back there to spend the night. They get stopped and defendant gets arrested. Defendant is a suspect in a robbery. The police get consent from … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Nexus | Comments Off on PA: Occupant of house lacked authority to consent to search intended guest’s luggage

S.D.W.Va.: Def’s girlfriend consented to search of house for guns when order of protection issued

Defendant’s live-in girlfriend went to the courthouse and obtained an emergency protection order (EPO) which, under West Virginia law, required the respondent to rid himself of firearms. Here, she specifically alleged that she’d been threatened with a gun. Police came … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Def’s girlfriend consented to search of house for guns when order of protection issued

CA11: “[D]o what you gotta do” was consent here

“[D]o what you gotta do” was consent here, not mere acquiescence to authority. “The officers’ testimony at the suppression hearing also reflects that May gave permission to enter. In similar circumstances where only a few officers were present without their … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA11: “[D]o what you gotta do” was consent here

OR: Common authority over space does not mean common authority over all items in that space

Common authority over space does not mean common authority over all items in that space. Just because people could go into defendant’s bedroom does not mean that they had common authority over everything in the room. There was no common … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on OR: Common authority over space does not mean common authority over all items in that space

CA7: Defense witness on apparent authority completely unbelievable

This district court did not credit defendant’s witness on the question of consent. As for credibility, “The court relied on the officers’ corroborative testimony, Hearnes’s ‘willingness to lie to law enforcement and under oath,’ and Hearnes’s demeanor throughout her testimony, … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Burden of proof, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Defense witness on apparent authority completely unbelievable

OH12: Living with a probationer is not a complete waiver of a reasonable expectation of privacy, except as to common areas

By living with a probationer, one’s reasonable expectation of privacy is not completely lost and the entire house is not open to a probation search. The probationer can only consent to search of common areas. Here, the probationer let the … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH12: Living with a probationer is not a complete waiver of a reasonable expectation of privacy, except as to common areas

MD: Drug deal in defendant’s vestibule was in open view and opening glass door was by exigency

Remembering that there is a difference between plain view and open view, the officers saw defendant selling cocaine in the vestibule between a glass door and the front door of his house. When the police approached, they could see the … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on MD: Drug deal in defendant’s vestibule was in open view and opening glass door was by exigency

E.D.Mo.: By calling police to a home invasion robbery, defendant consented to entries

Defendant called the police because he was the victim of a home invasion robbery. That investigation also turned into an investigation of defendant for drug possession. Officers returned the next day to talk about the home invasion, but they also … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: By calling police to a home invasion robbery, defendant consented to entries

CA4: Officers didn’t force their way in, but the exceptions to knock-and-announce applied

The officer hit defendant’s door hard to announce his presence under the knock-and-announce requirement and the door swung open on its own. That was technically a “breaking” under § 3109, but it was reasonable to enter without announcement because of … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Consent, Knock and announce, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: Officers didn’t force their way in, but the exceptions to knock-and-announce applied

TN: Named eyewitness to shooting was not a “CI” needing corroboration

The “CI” in this homicide case was a known eyewitness who knew the defendant. He was a citizen informant, not a mere snitch, and his version had a presumption of reliability. State v. Dotson, 2014 Tenn. LEXIS 694 (September 30, … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Informant hearsay, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on TN: Named eyewitness to shooting was not a “CI” needing corroboration

FL2: Common authority to consent did not extend to guest’s backpack

The owner of the place searched had the authority to consent to a search of the bedroom where defendant was sleeping. Defendant was just a short term guest and was asleep when the police came in. The common authority applied … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Inventory, Probable cause | Comments Off on FL2: Common authority to consent did not extend to guest’s backpack

Cal.2: Pre-Riley cell phone search incident expressly authorized by case law so Davis GFE applies

The pre-Riley search of defendant’s cell phone was expressly permitted by California case law at the time of the search, so the good faith exception applies. People v. Macabeo, 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 793 (2d Dist. September 3, 2014). Based … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on Cal.2: Pre-Riley cell phone search incident expressly authorized by case law so Davis GFE applies

CA5: Consent to search trunk doesn’t include passengers bags, too; no apparent authority

While the government didn’t argue standing in the USDC, it was decided, so it can appeal on that question. Passengers in a vehicle have standing to challenge the search of their own luggage. Here, the driver’s consent to search the … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on CA5: Consent to search trunk doesn’t include passengers bags, too; no apparent authority

E.D.Wis.: Officers are not required to doubt what they see in determining apparent authority to consent

The consenter called 911 to say that her live-in boyfriend locked her out of the house and battered her. When they arrived, she was back in, and her children were there, along with her and clothes and kids’ toys. Based … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Officers are not required to doubt what they see in determining apparent authority to consent

W.D.Ky.: Casual visitor had no apparent authority to consent, and he wasn’t even asked what his connection was

Merely answering the door isn’t enough to be asked for consent. This guy was a casual visitor, he had no actual authority to consent, and the police made no effort to determine his apparent authority. If they asked, it would … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Casual visitor had no apparent authority to consent, and he wasn’t even asked what his connection was