Category Archives: Emergency / exigency

IN: Def mom’s arrest outside of home permitted officers to enter to check on unattended young children

Defendant was stopped at night on the way to the store for milk for her kids for morning, and she was arrested and searched because she smelled of marijuana. She told the officers about the children at home alone. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on IN: Def mom’s arrest outside of home permitted officers to enter to check on unattended young children

CA10: “not every domestic call justifies a warrantless entry,” but this one objectively did

“Although not every domestic call justifies a warrantless entry, see id. at 1244 (rejecting ‘a special rule for domestic calls because they are inherently violent’), the officers had information in addition to the call that indicated McCoy’s girlfriend’s safety could … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA10: “not every domestic call justifies a warrantless entry,” but this one objectively did

M.D.Pa.: Domestic violence call wasn’t immediately before police arrival, but there was no objective evidence danger had dissipated either

The officer here had a reasonable belief that there had recently been a domestic battery on the premises, the door was open, and no one was visible. “Thus, there was no objective evidence to suggest that any imminent threat posed … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Domestic violence call wasn’t immediately before police arrival, but there was no objective evidence danger had dissipated either

KS: State gets benefit of GFE in DUI cases in a post-McNeely stop but before state supreme court ruled

While McNeely was decided in April 2013 and defendant’s DWI stop was in September 2013, the state supreme court had not held the implied consent statute unconstitutional until later. Therefore, the good faith exception applied. State v. Kraemer, 2016 Kan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception | Comments Off on KS: State gets benefit of GFE in DUI cases in a post-McNeely stop but before state supreme court ruled

E.D.N.C.: Def knew police were “on his tail” that he possessed CP, and that authorized warrantless seizure

The record supports the conclusion that defendant, a probationer, knew that the police were “on his tail” that he possessed child pornography and expressed concern about finding child pornography on his electronics. Thus, the police acted reasonably in seizing a … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Def knew police were “on his tail” that he possessed CP, and that authorized warrantless seizure

N.D.Okla.: Warrantless entry into house was reasonable for officer safety and to prevent destruction of evidence

Officers acted reasonably in entering defendant’s house without a warrant to both prevent destruction of evidence and protect the safety of the officers. United States v. Aguirre, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50236 (N.D. Okla. April 14, 2016):

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Warrantless entry into house was reasonable for officer safety and to prevent destruction of evidence

MO: Driver had standing because passenger was owner of car

Defendant was driving his girlfriend’s car, and she was the passenger. Stopped for a traffic offense, the officer found a warrant from another town, but advised that they didn’t want him arrested on it. The paperwork on the car was … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on MO: Driver had standing because passenger was owner of car

E.D.Va.: Denying ownership of phone and knowledge of password was a lack of REP

There were exigent circumstances for seizure of defendant’s cell phone because of the possibility of the phone being remotely erased or thrown away. Then defendant denied knowledge of the password or ownership of the phone, and that showed a lack … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Denying ownership of phone and knowledge of password was a lack of REP

OH5: Entry permitted by 911 call of unresponsive person; protective sweep factually unjustified

A 911 call about an unresponsive man was justification for a warrantless entry into defendant’s apartment, but no facts justified a protective sweep once inside. Heroin in bedroom suppressed. State v. Levengood, 2016-Ohio-1340, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 1227 (5th Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on OH5: Entry permitted by 911 call of unresponsive person; protective sweep factually unjustified

IA: While no “hot pursuit” of DUI suspect into his house, def’s belligerent attitude justified exigency for entry

Defendant was driving under the influence, having run into a building, and the police were called. When officers got to defendant’s home, he was somewhat belligerent, and the police ultimately entered the house. Distinguishing Welsh v. Wisconsin and admitting there … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on IA: While no “hot pursuit” of DUI suspect into his house, def’s belligerent attitude justified exigency for entry

CA3: Entry for arrest was virtual hot pursuit; door opened on knock

An off-duty officer witnessed a robbery at a 7-Eleven at 4:30 am and followed the masked man out on the street where the mask was removed, and he got a look at the robber’s face. He followed to a duplex … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA3: Entry for arrest was virtual hot pursuit; door opened on knock

CA7: The rubric of “consent once removed” needs to be jettisoned as meaningless, but entry still valid by exigency

The rubric of “consent once removed” needs to be jettisoned as meaningless. Here, there was real exigency after the informant’s entry into a potentially dangerous situation with the undercover officers watching, and that was sufficient to justify the entry without … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA7: The rubric of “consent once removed” needs to be jettisoned as meaningless, but entry still valid by exigency

CA9: 911 domestic abuse call from woman didn’t justify entry when she answered door and questions

The police entry into the house on a 911 call from a woman about a domestic abuse call wasn’t justified when she answered the door and their questions and wasn’t hurt and didn’t seem scared. United States v. Harris, 2016 … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA9: 911 domestic abuse call from woman didn’t justify entry when she answered door and questions

OR: Emergency aid doctrine permitted entry, but search had to stop when it was shown dissipated

The emergency aid exception to the warrant requirement justified officers’ warrantless entry into defendant’s home because there was a report of yelling and sounds of possible hitting, defendant was intoxicated, uncooperative and belligerent to the officers, and he repeatedly lied … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OR: Emergency aid doctrine permitted entry, but search had to stop when it was shown dissipated

M.D.Fla.: Def was a potential suspect in a series of robberies, and he gave cause for an exigent circumstances into a hotel room after he kicked in the door; plain view sustained

An Hispanic male wearing somewhat distinctive clothing committed four robberies around Tampa. Surveillance video put a vehicle at one of the robberies, and officers found it and surveilled it at a motel parking lot. A couple was around the vehicle … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Def was a potential suspect in a series of robberies, and he gave cause for an exigent circumstances into a hotel room after he kicked in the door; plain view sustained

WI: Exigency permitted warrantless blood draw of apparent heroin OD, even though he was given antidote

Officers and paramedics were called by friends to a man not breathing in a house. Defendant was found and it had signs of a drug overdose. His blood was drawn to test it, and he was given an injection of … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on WI: Exigency permitted warrantless blood draw of apparent heroin OD, even though he was given antidote

IA: 911 hang up call justified a police walk through even though occupants said everything was fine

Police received a 911 hang up call, and an officer was dispatched. Outside the home, the smell of burning marijuana was strong. The officer came to the door, was assured everything was alright, but he said he had to check … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: 911 hang up call justified a police walk through even though occupants said everything was fine

ID: A 15 year old runaway on the property is an exigent circumstance

The search of defendant’s shed for a 15 year old runaway was reasonable on exigent circumstances, and there was a no contact order between them. State v. Smith, 2016 Ida. App. LEXIS 20 (Feb. 16, 2016). Defendant moved to suppress … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Independent source | Comments Off on ID: A 15 year old runaway on the property is an exigent circumstance

ME: Four failed breath tests in 90 min was exigency for warrantless blood draw

The state showed exigent circumstances for a warrantless blood draw. The officer took defendant to a nearby police station where he had after hours access to get a breath sample, but the machine wasn’t working and he didn’t know it. … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on ME: Four failed breath tests in 90 min was exigency for warrantless blood draw

TN: Crime scene investigators arrived right behind the police to a shooting call; crime scene search was reasonable under Mincey

Police received a call to a shooting, and people at the scene were shouting “Officer Shaffer pulled into the driveway and blocked the car so that it could not leave. The driver of the car stopped, got out, and yelled … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness | Comments Off on TN: Crime scene investigators arrived right behind the police to a shooting call; crime scene search was reasonable under Mincey