Category Archives: Consent

NY3: Despite suppressed statement, plenty of evidence supported strip search for drugs

Defendant was in a car stopped for a traffic offense, and the driver got out agitated and crying that the passengers had drugs on them. They consented to searches of their persons and drugs were found. On the way to … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Independent source | Comments Off on NY3: Despite suppressed statement, plenty of evidence supported strip search for drugs

N-MCCA: Def’s consent to recovery of laptop from him already searched and returned was independent source

On a Navy ship, a crewmember accessing the ship’s LAN looking for a movie stumbled into defendant’s computer on the LAN and found child pornography. He reported what he found and that it came from MAYO-PC. They found the laptop … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Independent source | Comments Off on N-MCCA: Def’s consent to recovery of laptop from him already searched and returned was independent source

DE: Handcuffing naked probationer in hotel room was reasonable for officer safety because of the way he looked at pile of clothes on bed

Delaware probation officers need reasonable suspicion for a search, and here they had it. Defendant had moved to a hotel without telling probation, and he’d switched rooms three times in a week. When they came to the room he was … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on DE: Handcuffing naked probationer in hotel room was reasonable for officer safety because of the way he looked at pile of clothes on bed

NJ: Codefendant’s appeal not law of the case; parties get to argue their own cases

The decision in a co-defendant’s separate appeal on a search and seizure question is not “law of the case” as to another defendant’s appeal. The law of the case doctrine requires the same parties, and it would offend due process … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: Codefendant’s appeal not law of the case; parties get to argue their own cases

BLT: D.C. Circuit Judge Gives Advice on How to Talk to Police

BLT: D.C. Circuit Judge Gives Advice on How to Talk to Police: D.C. Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown on Tuesday urged citizens to exercise their right to end what are supposed to be voluntary encounters with D.C. police. Brown expressed … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on BLT: D.C. Circuit Judge Gives Advice on How to Talk to Police

DC Cir.: Asking defendant about having a gun wasn’t a stop before he fled

Officers in the DC Metro PD’s gun recovery unit saw defendant walking, and one asked “[H]ey, it is the police, how are you doing? Do you have a gun?” Defendant didn’t answer, so the car stopped and one got out … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Seizure | Comments Off on DC Cir.: Asking defendant about having a gun wasn’t a stop before he fled

IN: Flight from car is abandonment of the cell phone inside, too

Defendant’s flight from his car and into the woods was an abandonment of the car and the contents. Thus, the warrantless search of his cell phone left in the car was reasonable. Harrison v. State, 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 357 … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on IN: Flight from car is abandonment of the cell phone inside, too

D.Nev.: FBI internet ruse against USAO advice leads to suppression of entry by deception (R&R adopted)

The USMJ issued her R&R on February 2d, and I posted the next day. Friday, the USDJ adopted the R&R, and the press goes wild, apparently oblivious to the news stories from February 2d. United States v. Phua, 2015 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent | Comments Off on D.Nev.: FBI internet ruse against USAO advice leads to suppression of entry by deception (R&R adopted)

N.D.Ga.: Consent after arrest at gunpoint was still valid

“Although the encounter was initially coercive, by the time Shull asked Defendant for consent to search her car, she was standing by the car, the deputies had re-holstered their weapons, and Shull spoke with her in a calm, professional manner, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Consent after arrest at gunpoint was still valid

DE: Name of owner of property in SW doesn’t need to be identified to be valid

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging that defendant wasn’t named in the search warrant for his specifically described property. [Remember, search warrants are usually for specifically ID’d places, and naming the owner is almost never necessary. If the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on DE: Name of owner of property in SW doesn’t need to be identified to be valid

D.Mass.: When defendant was arrested on a SW for premises for just him, a search incident of his bag while handcuffed would be unreasonable; but, he consented

Officers had a search warrant for premises (based on a warrant pinging his cell phone) to arrest defendant. The search incident of his bag at the time could not be justified by the search incident doctrine because he was handcuffed … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Mass.: When defendant was arrested on a SW for premises for just him, a search incident of his bag while handcuffed would be unreasonable; but, he consented

D.Nev.: Facebook post of dead protected migratory bird was PC

A Facebook post of a dead bird taken in violation of the Migratory Bird Act is itself probable cause of a violation of the Act. The only question then is the place to be searched, and it’s logical for a … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Facebook post of dead protected migratory bird was PC

OH11: Possible domestic dispute in car justified its stop

What was going on in the car suggested to the officer that a domestic disturbance was ongoing, and it was reasonable for the officer to inquire. State v. Smith, 2015-Ohio-1204, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 1225 (11th Dist. April 2, 2015).* … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH11: Possible domestic dispute in car justified its stop

D.Conn.: In a stop, hesitation then flight is still no submission to authority

When the police tried to stop defendant, he hesitated and then ran, leaving a duffle bag with a gun inside. He argued he was unconstitutionally stopped. No. “In order ‘to comply with an order to stop—and thus to become seized—a … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Burden of proof, Consent | Comments Off on D.Conn.: In a stop, hesitation then flight is still no submission to authority

TX1: Heien ‘reasonable mistake of law’ rejected because Texas doesn’t follow GFE

Defendant was followed to a stop with a flat tire. The officer noticed signs of intoxication, and defendant ended up arrested for DWI. The warrantless blood draw couldn’t be based on two prior DWIs as exigency. Moreover, “Accordingly, we decline … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on TX1: Heien ‘reasonable mistake of law’ rejected because Texas doesn’t follow GFE

TX1: Comment on refusal to consent here wasn’t prejudicial

The prosecutor commented on defendant’s refusal to consent and defense counsel didn’t object. On this record, there was plenty of evidence of defendant’s knowledge of the drugs such that the error, if it was, was prejudicial to him. Jones v. … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TX1: Comment on refusal to consent here wasn’t prejudicial

CA5: Texas deer breeding industry is “closely regulated”

Based on prior case law, “the provisions regulating the [Texas] deer breeder industry are sufficiently ‘extensive’ to place that activity ‘squarely within the class of industries to which Burger applies.’” Therefore, it was a closely regulated industry, and the administrative … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Burden of proof, Consent | Comments Off on CA5: Texas deer breeding industry is “closely regulated”

NY3: Trial court should have reopened suppression hearing with affidavit showing guest standing

Defense counsel filed a motion to suppress, and it was denied because defendant did not show he was anything other than a transient guest in the premises. An affidavit from the owner was presented the day of the plea that … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on NY3: Trial court should have reopened suppression hearing with affidavit showing guest standing

W.D.N.C.: Police gathering IP information via a peer-to-peer connections is legitimate investigative technique

Police gathering of IP information about peer-to-peer networks is a legitimate investigative technique, and it violates no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Baalerud, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37650 (W.D.N.C. March 25, 2015).* 2255 petitioner’s sentence was increased for … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Police gathering IP information via a peer-to-peer connections is legitimate investigative technique

CA10: Standing to challenge a wiretap doesn’t translate to standing to challenge a search of somebody else’s car based on the wiretap

Standing to challenge a wiretap doesn’t translate to standing to challenge a search of somebody else’s car based on the wiretap. United States v. Ocegueda, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4867 (10th Cir. March 25, 2015). Defendant consented to a patdown … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA10: Standing to challenge a wiretap doesn’t translate to standing to challenge a search of somebody else’s car based on the wiretap