DE: Handcuffing naked probationer in hotel room was reasonable for officer safety because of the way he looked at pile of clothes on bed

Delaware probation officers need reasonable suspicion for a search, and here they had it. Defendant had moved to a hotel without telling probation, and he’d switched rooms three times in a week. When they came to the room he was naked. He was pacing around the bed, and it was reasonable to handcuff him and search the bed for officer safety. State v. McNeill, 2015 Del. Super. LEXIS 204 (April 23, 2015).*

The 17 year old juvenile was walking with another at night and saw the police car. He tossed an L shaped object into a yard, which the officer correctly assumed was a gun. It was clearly abandoned property. (There hadn’t even been anything close to an effort to stop him.) J.B. v. State, 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 366 (April 23, 2015).*

Despite using hotel staff to knock at the door of defendants’ room, the district court’s finding of consent to enter are clearly supported by the record. Yes, it might have been intimidating to have DEA agents at the door, but, on the totality, it was consensual. United States v. Johnson, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6767 (11th Cir. April 24, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, Consent, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.