D.Nev.: Facebook post of dead protected migratory bird was PC

A Facebook post of a dead bird taken in violation of the Migratory Bird Act is itself probable cause of a violation of the Act. The only question then is the place to be searched, and it’s logical for a warrant to issue to search defendant’s house. Wildlife officers investigated, tracked down defendant’s address, and then got the warrant. There also was no justification for a Franks hearing. United States v. Acevedo-Hernandez, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45391 (D.Nev. January 7, 2015), adopted 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73189 (D.Nev. June 5, 2015).

Defendant’s detention for about an hour waiting for a drug dog was reasonable based on the totality of circumstances. They were staying at a tribal casino hotel, and housekeeping found a baggie of meth on the pillow in their room. Casino security was informed. Because they weren’t tribal members, the local sheriff was called who came with a drug dog, and their car on the parking lot was subjected to a sniff that was positive. This was all based on more than just reasonable suspicion. United States v. Simeon, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45011 (N.D. Iowa April 7, 2015).*

The officer had reasonable suspicion to detain defendant for the slight duration. When he asked defendant about the suitcase he saw somebody put in the backseat of defendant’s car, he asked if he could search it, and defendant agreed: “No, I don’t care. Go ahead. I told you it’s not mine.” The conversation during the detention was not an arrest, so Miranda didn’t apply. United States v. Nuckles, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45406 (N.D.Ga. April 6, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Consent, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.