Category Archives: Burden of pleading

N.D.Ind.: Merely saying in a motion to suppress def was arrested without probable cause doesn’t state grounds

Defendant does not offer further context or analysis. Based upon his failure to fully address this issue, the Defendant’s argument regarding an alleged illegal search and seizure is denied without prejudice. See United States v. Collins, 796 F.3d 829, 836 … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Merely saying in a motion to suppress def was arrested without probable cause doesn’t state grounds

OH9: Pro se 4A argument never presented to trial court not considered

Pro se argument that the search warrant was invalid wasn’t preserved by a motion to suppress in the trial court. State v. Daniels, 2020-Ohio-1176, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 1097 (9th Dist. Mar. 30, 2020).* Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim (among others) … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH9: Pro se 4A argument never presented to trial court not considered

CA2: Barring cross-examination on execution of SW on cell phone wasn’t shown to be prejudicial

The district court didn’t err in sustaining the government’s objection to cross-examination about the execution of the search warrant on defendant’s cell phone because there was no showing that the warrant wasn’t improperly executed. United States v. Vargas, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA2: Barring cross-examination on execution of SW on cell phone wasn’t shown to be prejudicial

D.Nev.: Affidavit for SW for DNA showed PC by parallels between two crimes and def

“The underlying facts in the affidavit compare the actions of Tualua with the actions of the people who committed the prior EZ Pawn robberies, which would allow the issuing judge to make his or her own conclusions. Under the totality … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, DNA | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Affidavit for SW for DNA showed PC by parallels between two crimes and def

CA9: Motion to suppress tax records obtained by IRS because his “private property interests” were invaded wasn’t presented below and is waived

“Galloway next argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the IRS’s warrantless inspection of his financial records violated his private-property interests under the Fourth Amendment. But Galloway ‘never requested suppression on this ground in … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Motion to suppress tax records obtained by IRS because his “private property interests” were invaded wasn’t presented below and is waived

Cal.: Mid-trial objection to question based on lack of PC for search was untimely objection to the search

A mid-trial objection to evidence on the ground there was no probable cause for the police action in the search was untimely. It can only be brought during trial if the facts weren’t known until then, and that’s not what … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.: Mid-trial objection to question based on lack of PC for search was untimely objection to the search

E.D.Pa.: Hiding gun in wheel well of vehicle of another was abandonment; nothing after that has any legal effect

Hiding a gun in the wheel well of someone else’s vehicle to keep it from the police is an abandonment. “Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the wheel well of someone else’s red Ford parked on a public … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Burden of pleading | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Hiding gun in wheel well of vehicle of another was abandonment; nothing after that has any legal effect

D.D.C.: Example of distancing the client from drugs but maintaining standing

Like walking a tightrope: United States v. Thorne, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4291 (D.D.C. Jan. 10, 2020):

Posted in Burden of pleading, Standing | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Example of distancing the client from drugs but maintaining standing

D.Nev.: Def’s motion to join codef’s motion to suppress requires showing of REP in joinder motion

Defendant’s motion to join a codefendant’s motion to suppress requires a showing of his reasonable expectation of privacy in the joinder motion. United States v. Palafox, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3698 (D. Nev. Jan. 7, 2020). “[T]he affidavit includes facts … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Def’s motion to join codef’s motion to suppress requires showing of REP in joinder motion

W.D.N.Y.: A mere general statement in motion to suppress SW lacks PC doesn’t preserve the issue

Defendant’s general argument that probable cause was lacking for the search warrant in this case was inadequate to preserve the issue. Even considering the merits, there was probable cause. United States v. Dolson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 216913 (W.D. N.Y. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: A mere general statement in motion to suppress SW lacks PC doesn’t preserve the issue

OH: State has burden to plead lack of standing in response to a motion to suppress and can’t remain silent without waiving

When defendant files a motion to suppress and the state questions standing, it has the burden of going forward to at least raise the issue so defendant can meet it. Without doing so in the trial court, the state waives … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Standing | Comments Off on OH: State has burden to plead lack of standing in response to a motion to suppress and can’t remain silent without waiving

E.D.N.C.: On a video that’s integral to the PC, the reliability of the time stamp isn’t to be inquired into or it becomes a “hypertechnical” review

Defendant was on a surveillance video 33 days before a search warrant was sought for the weapon since he was a felon. The warrant was not stale because people almost always keep firearms for a long time. Defendant’s challenge to … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of pleading, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: On a video that’s integral to the PC, the reliability of the time stamp isn’t to be inquired into or it becomes a “hypertechnical” review

IN: Def’s raising GFE for first time in reply brief is waiver

It’s defendant’s burden in challenging a search warrant to raise both the defects in the warrant (such as a lack of probable cause) and inapplicability of the good faith exception. Raising the good faith exception in his reply brief is … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Good faith exception | Comments Off on IN: Def’s raising GFE for first time in reply brief is waiver

D.Ariz.: SW for law office was apparently one office with one entrance

HSI obtained a search warrant for the “law office of Marivel Cantu-Madril” which was in Suite D at the address, and her husband’s law office was in Suite E. The entrance to both offices was through the front door to … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: SW for law office was apparently one office with one entrance

NY2: Def has right of access to SW affidavit to attempt to controvert it

Defendant filed his motion to suppress in the blind because didn’t have access to the affidavit for the search warrant. It was denied without a hearing. Remanded: He gets to see it to try to controvert it. People v. Lambey, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on NY2: Def has right of access to SW affidavit to attempt to controvert it

N.D.Ill.: Franks challenge requires there was a SW

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not seeking a Franks hearing where there was no search warrant in the first place. Freeman v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187171 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 29, 2019). Defendant’s general consent to search a … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Scope of search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Franks challenge requires there was a SW

AK: Inadequate briefing and failure to get ruling on 4A issue below is waiver

“To the extent Kuller is attempting to raise a Fourth Amendment challenge to his probation conditions, this claim is waived due to inadequate briefing. … We also note that Kuller never directly raised a Fourth Amendment claim below and the … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on AK: Inadequate briefing and failure to get ruling on 4A issue below is waiver

NC: Failure to raise legality of arrest in trial court precluded appellate review

Defendant was an anti-abortion protestor with a sound system, and he was detained for a noise violation after officers with a 3M sound meter found him over the sound ordinance limit. He was to be arrested for that and he … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on NC: Failure to raise legality of arrest in trial court precluded appellate review

SD: Def’s search issue on appeal wasn’t presented to the trial court, so it’s waived

Defendant’s claim that evidence discovering during a traffic stop had to be suppressed because the duration of the stop was unlawful was waived because he failed to advance that argument before the trial court. State v. Willingham, 2019 SD 55, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Search incident | Comments Off on SD: Def’s search issue on appeal wasn’t presented to the trial court, so it’s waived

OR: Appeal of order of mother in juvenile case to provide UAs affirmed for an insufficient appellate record

The mother of a juvenile was ordered to give observed UAs as a part of a dependency-neglect proceeding. She didn’t provide a sufficient appellate record to decide whether the trial court’s order violated the state constitution, so it’s affirmed. Dep’t … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Appeal of order of mother in juvenile case to provide UAs affirmed for an insufficient appellate record