Author Archives: Hall

WaPo: FBI ponders sharing tool to help unlock iPhone with local law agencies

WaPo: FBI ponders sharing tool to help unlock iPhone with local law agencies by Ellen Nakashima and Adam Goldman: The FBI and Justice Department are debating whether the hacking tool that helped the bureau unlock the iPhone of one of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on WaPo: FBI ponders sharing tool to help unlock iPhone with local law agencies

NYTimes: Police Body Cameras: What Do You See?

NYTimes: Police Body Cameras: What Do You See? by Timothy Williams, James Thomas, Samuel Jacoby, and Damien Cave: Public frustration with policing has led to calls nationwide for more cameras worn by officers. But what do those cameras actually reveal?

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on NYTimes: Police Body Cameras: What Do You See?

OH5: Entry permitted by 911 call of unresponsive person; protective sweep factually unjustified

A 911 call about an unresponsive man was justification for a warrantless entry into defendant’s apartment, but no facts justified a protective sweep once inside. Heroin in bedroom suppressed. State v. Levengood, 2016-Ohio-1340, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 1227 (5th Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on OH5: Entry permitted by 911 call of unresponsive person; protective sweep factually unjustified

DC Velocity: Electronic logging devices do not improve safety; mandate is unconstitutional, trucking group says

DC Velocity: Electronic logging devices do not improve safety; mandate is unconstitutional, trucking group says: OOIDA files brief asking court to overturn ELD mandate, saying it violates Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Posted in Administrative search, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on DC Velocity: Electronic logging devices do not improve safety; mandate is unconstitutional, trucking group says

D.Neb.: Can’t prove judge issuing SW was a “rubberstamp” for the police when there was, in fact, probable cause

When arguing that the good faith exception does not apply, the “wholly abandoned his judicial role” exception needs an offer of proof. If, however, there is, in fact, probable cause, how do you prove that? You can’t. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Can’t prove judge issuing SW was a “rubberstamp” for the police when there was, in fact, probable cause

MO: Where items included in SW without PC, severance of the warrant is required, not blanket suppression

Officers checked off boxes on a search warrant form about what to search for (not a good way to present a warrant). Items 1-9 (property) that were found were supported by probable cause, and item 10 (corpse) wasn’t, but that … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on MO: Where items included in SW without PC, severance of the warrant is required, not blanket suppression

TN: Failure to leave the SW not a “clerical error” subject to cure or GFE

In 2011, Tennessee adopted the Exclusionary Rule Reform Act with a statutory good faith exception that included “clerical errors.” Failing to leave a copy of the warrant at the place searched or with the householder is not a “clerical error.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TN: Failure to leave the SW not a “clerical error” subject to cure or GFE

IL: Once officers leave the premises after executing a SW, they need another to come back

Police searched defendant’s house with a warrant, unhandcuffed defendant, and left. Then they returned to search again. A second warrant was required. Just because they could have obtained a second warrant doesn’t mean that was inevitable discovery. [And what’s the … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IL: Once officers leave the premises after executing a SW, they need another to come back

PA: Warrant said “residence,” so it was not limited to garage, even though the PC was directed at it

The drug search warrant specified “the residence,” but the primary focus was the garage because that’s what the police knew. That did not mean, however, that only the garage could be searched. In the course of the drug investigation, police … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on PA: Warrant said “residence,” so it was not limited to garage, even though the PC was directed at it

MD: Stringray/Hailstorm cell phone tracking device a search; nondisclosure agreement unconstitutional

The use of a Stingray/Hailstorm device to track a cell phone is a search under the Fourth Amendment. The Nondisclosure Agreement is essentially unconstitutional because of the state’s argument they don’t have to disclose what they were doing. The court … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Cell site simulators | Comments Off on MD: Stringray/Hailstorm cell phone tracking device a search; nondisclosure agreement unconstitutional

WaPo: What life is like after police ransack your house and take ‘every belonging’ — then the charges are dropped

WaPo: What life is like after police ransack your house and take ‘every belonging’ — then the charges are dropped By Christopher Ingraham: A self-described Michigan “soccer mom” who had “every belonging” taken from her family in a 2014 drug … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on WaPo: What life is like after police ransack your house and take ‘every belonging’ — then the charges are dropped

OH11: Officers had reason to believe def at home; entry and plain view valid

Officers had an arrest warrant for defendant and knocked at her apartment door saying only “Sheriff’s Office.” A falsetto voice said “Ashley’s not here.” Officers responded “How do you know we’re looking for Ashley?” They were let in, and they … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH11: Officers had reason to believe def at home; entry and plain view valid

IL: Unconveyed intent to seize def didn’t make this not consensual

The officer’s subjective intent that this was a seizure was not conveyed to defendant, and each of the queries to defendant were requests not commands. Defendant consented. “Specifically, LaGrange testified that when he asked Youngman if he had anything illegal … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Seizure | Comments Off on IL: Unconveyed intent to seize def didn’t make this not consensual

CA11: Putting a backpack in trunk and distancing self from it and then giving false name was abandonment

The search of defendant’s backpack was supported by two rationales: Lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy and automobile exception. As to the former, “Even if Rivera did have a reasonable expectation of privacy, the district court found that Rivera … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA11: Putting a backpack in trunk and distancing self from it and then giving false name was abandonment

N.D.Ill.: Assistance and foreign wiretap were done by locals; no U.S. involvement, so no 4A protection

Defendant was indicted for ATM skimming and other identity theft offenses. The FBI started the investigation and contacted Bulgarian police about phone numbers from there. Bulgarian police tied the numbers to defendant, and they procured wiretaps at U.S. request and … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreign searches | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Assistance and foreign wiretap were done by locals; no U.S. involvement, so no 4A protection

N.D.Ga.: Making money but no job was RS for a probation search

Reasonable suspicion for a probation search came from a “trusted” person call that defendant was making money but had no job and he was a past meth dealer. That was enough. Then defendant consented, too. United States v. Danner, 2016 … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Making money but no job was RS for a probation search

MA: Collective knowledge of nothing is still nothing, despite stopping officer’s good faith

Collective knowledge here was not reasonable suspicion. Defendant’s vehicle was reportedly involved in a shooting and stopped based on a radio report from Boston PD to another department. Defendant, however, had left the scene of the shooting ten minutes before … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge | Comments Off on MA: Collective knowledge of nothing is still nothing, despite stopping officer’s good faith

U.S.News & World Report: Merrick Garland’s Trunk-Search Ruling Gives Some Defense Advocates Chills [Typical Internet headline hyperbole]

U.S.News & World Report: Merrick Garland’s Trunk-Search Ruling Gives Some Defense Advocates Chills Scholars say, however, the decision is within the judicial mainstream. [The headline alone is enough to make me not even want to read it because the writer … Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on U.S.News & World Report: Merrick Garland’s Trunk-Search Ruling Gives Some Defense Advocates Chills [Typical Internet headline hyperbole]

USA Today: 1,000 locked devices in limbo after FBI quits iPhone case

USA Today: 1,000 locked devices in limbo after FBI quits iPhone case by Kevin Johnson and Elizabeth Weise: The government’s surprise decision to withdraw its case against Apple over the San Bernardino killer’s iPhone adds uncertainty to criminal cases where … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on USA Today: 1,000 locked devices in limbo after FBI quits iPhone case

D.Kan.: USMJ scholarly opinion on history of email SWs; “Needless to say, a person’s email account may reveal their ‘privacies of life.’”

The government’s email account search warrant request is overbroad as to what is being seized. The court analogizes Riley and notes that email accounts can provide a detailed picture of a person’s life the same as a cell phone search. … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Overbreadth | Comments Off on D.Kan.: USMJ scholarly opinion on history of email SWs; “Needless to say, a person’s email account may reveal their ‘privacies of life.’”