TN: Failure to leave the SW not a “clerical error” subject to cure or GFE

In 2011, Tennessee adopted the Exclusionary Rule Reform Act with a statutory good faith exception that included “clerical errors.” Failing to leave a copy of the warrant at the place searched or with the householder is not a “clerical error.” The statute doesn’t say that, and the court won’t add it. Failure to leave a copy of the warrant is a fatal defect under state Rule 41(g)(6). Leaving the warrant serves an important purpose in the law. State v. Daniel, 2016 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 220 (March 29, 2016):

Our supreme court has explained the purposes served by warrants as follows:

Warrants serve to provide law enforcement officials and persons subject to such warrants with written evidence that the search has been authorized by a judicial officer upon a showing of probable cause. Warrants also serve to define and to limit the duration and scope of authority of law enforcement officials by delineating the specific date and time of issuance of the warrant and by describing with particularity the premises to be searched and the items subject to seizure.

State v. Davis, 185 S.W.3d 338, 345 (Tenn. 2006). Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(d) provides that a magistrate shall prepare an original and two exact copies of a search warrant and that one of the copies “shall be left with the person or persons on whom the search warrant is served.” Leaving a copy of the warrant with the person on whom the warrant is served is reiterated in 41(e)(4), which states that the officer who executes a search warrant “shall: (A) give to the person from whom or from whose premises the property was taken a copy of the warrant and a receipt for the property; or (B) shall leave the copy and receipt at a place from which the property was taken.” Tenn. R. Crim. P. 41(e)(4). “The purpose of providing notice to the owner of seized property is to notify the owner of the source of the seizure so that the owner can pursue available remedies for its return.” State v. Roy Len Rogers, No. E2011-02529-CCA-R3-CD, 2013 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 814, 2013 WL 5371987, at *18 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Knoxville, Sept. 23, 2013) (citing City of West Covina v. Perkins, 525 U.S. 234, 240, 119 S. Ct. 678, 142 L. Ed. 2d 636 (1999)). Rule 41(g)(6) provides that an officer’s “failure-where possible-[to] leave a copy of the warrant with the person or persons on whom the search warrant was served” requires exclusion of evidence seized during the warrant’s execution. Tenn. R. Crim. P. 41(g)(6).

This entry was posted in Good faith exception, Warrant requirement. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.