Author Archives: Hall

W.D.Ky.: Typo in the affidavit for SW didn’t merit suppression; when corrected, no staleness

The wiretap underlying the search warrant has already been sustained by the USDJ, so that can’t support suppressing the search. Defendant’s Franks challenge to the affidavit because of the date is really just a typo (2004 v. 2012), so it … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Typo in the affidavit for SW didn’t merit suppression; when corrected, no staleness

Bloomberg: Trump Quips He’d ‘Destroy’ Texas Lawmaker Who Irked Sheriff [over forfeiture reform]

Bloomberg: Trump Quips He’d ‘Destroy’ Texas Lawmaker Who Irked Sheriff by Toluse Olorunnipa & Margaret Talev: President Trump jokes about destroying a politician’s career

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Bloomberg: Trump Quips He’d ‘Destroy’ Texas Lawmaker Who Irked Sheriff [over forfeiture reform]

WaPo: These smart TVs were apparently spying on their owners [mere third party data?]

WaPo: These smart TVs were apparently spying on their owners by Hayley Tsukayama. So, if this is third party data, is it subject to mere subpoena and not a search warrant? Feel free to be creeped out. I have a … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: These smart TVs were apparently spying on their owners [mere third party data?]

Tenth Amendment Center: Montana House Passes Bill Taking on Warrantless Electronic Data Collection

Tenth Amendment Center: Montana House Passes Bill Taking on Warrantless Electronic Data Collection: HELENA, Mont. (Feb. 7, 2017) – Yesterday, the Montana House passed a bill that would require police to get a warrant in order to obtain electronic communication … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on Tenth Amendment Center: Montana House Passes Bill Taking on Warrantless Electronic Data Collection

CO: Dog alert for MJ still justifies a search of a car, even in a MMJ and recreational use state

Even in a recreational and medicinal marijuana state, the smell of marijuana picked up by a dog is probable cause including a search of the trunk. The court rejected the claim that the dog would alert on both legal and … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CO: Dog alert for MJ still justifies a search of a car, even in a MMJ and recreational use state

CA10: QI applies to suit by driver and his child in car over police shooting driver

Several officers attempted to stop plaintiff at 3:50 am, and he finally stopped. One officer got in front of the car with a shotgun, and the car moved forward. That officer fired two shots from a shotgun at the driver, … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: QI applies to suit by driver and his child in car over police shooting driver

Nervousness and reasonable suspicion

“By now, Deputy Kolbe was confronted with conflicting stories that, individually and collectively, defied common sense and reason. He had accumulated substantial observations of their suspicious behavior, beginning before he initiated the traffic stop and extending through the signs of … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Nervousness and reasonable suspicion

WaPo: New York Court of Appeals to hear argument in ‘In re 381 Search Warrants’ case

WaPo: New York Court of Appeals to hear argument in ‘In re 381 Search Warrants’ case by Orin Kerr:

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on WaPo: New York Court of Appeals to hear argument in ‘In re 381 Search Warrants’ case

NE: Automobile exception depends upon its mobility, not on def’s ability to move it

The automobile depends only on the mobility of the vehicle and not on whether defendant could be the one moving it. Even if he’s in custody, the vehicle is still movable. State v. Rocha, 295 Neb. 716, 2017 Neb. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on NE: Automobile exception depends upon its mobility, not on def’s ability to move it

W.D.Tex.: A cell phone may be searched under the border search exception [CA5 to decide soon]

A cell phone may be searched under the border search exception. While the Fifth Circuit hasn’t decided the issue yet, it soon will be [see quoted n.4, infra]. United States v. Molina-Isidoro, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183368 (W.D. Tex. Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: A cell phone may be searched under the border search exception [CA5 to decide soon]

NACDL Press Release: Nation’s Criminal Defense Bar Welcomes Passage by House of Representatives of the Email Privacy Act

NACDL Press Release: Nation’s Criminal Defense Bar Welcomes Passage by House of Representatives of the Email Privacy Act

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on NACDL Press Release: Nation’s Criminal Defense Bar Welcomes Passage by House of Representatives of the Email Privacy Act

CA1: No curtilage in def’s apt building yard

Defendant’s curtilage to an apartment building wasn’t violated by police entry through an unlocked back gate to get to the front door. (That apparently was a common way in.) Defendant came to the door and let them in, and then … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA1: No curtilage in def’s apt building yard

CA7: Def had no standing in a car shipped by car hauler being delivered to him that he’d never seen

Defendant had no standing in a car being shipped by a car hauler across the country when it was searched in transit. He was named neither the sender nor the recipient, and he had never been in or seen the … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA7: Def had no standing in a car shipped by car hauler being delivered to him that he’d never seen

WY also sees the Columbo-gambit: “you’re free to go but can I ask another question”

The state trooper here returned defendant’s paperwork to him and said to “have a nice day” and started back to the patrol car. But, he came back and asked if he could ask more questions. Even though the overhead lights … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on WY also sees the Columbo-gambit: “you’re free to go but can I ask another question”

Miami Herald: Ex-cop convicted of stealing from drivers during traffic stops

Miami Herald: Ex-cop convicted of stealing from drivers during traffic stop by David J. Neal:

Posted in Police misconduct | Comments Off on Miami Herald: Ex-cop convicted of stealing from drivers during traffic stops

LA2: Arrest of def away from the premises where SW being served unreasonable under Bailey

Defendant was seen leaving the premises when police showed up with a search warrant. Then they went after him and stopped him a distance a way to return him to the scene of the search. The stop lacked reasonable suspicion … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA2: Arrest of def away from the premises where SW being served unreasonable under Bailey

NY4: State didn’t prove stop justified for consent given in an interview room 4½ hrs later

At the suppression hearing from this 2001 stop, defendant consented in an interview room 4½ hrs after the stop to an officer who had nothing to do with the stop. The state didn’t prove the consent by failing to call … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NY4: State didn’t prove stop justified for consent given in an interview room 4½ hrs later

CA10: Handcuffing and jailing an inebriated man as “incapacitated” violated the 4A and no QI

Plaintiff showed up at a concert at the Xfinity Center in Boston inebriated, but not so drunk he didn’t know what he was doing. Security separated him from the incoming line into the hands of the defendant, an off-duty officer … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Handcuffing and jailing an inebriated man as “incapacitated” violated the 4A and no QI

MD: A stop and a frisk have separate constitutional justifications; courts must confine Terry to its 4A mooring

This Terry stop failed reasonable suspicion and all tenets of Terry. [Subtext: Police are abusing Terry, and the courts have to control them.] Ames v. State, 2017 Md. App. LEXIS 121 (Feb. 3, 2017) (Moylan, J.) (caution: The Lexis version … Continue reading →

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MD: A stop and a frisk have separate constitutional justifications; courts must confine Terry to its 4A mooring

CA4: No QI for arrest w/o PC and pft held for 80 days; lack of PC was obvious

Plaintiff was held for 80 days on an arrest utterly without probable cause, and the officer has no qualified immunity. Smith v. Munday, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 1975 (4th Cir. Feb. 3, 2017):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: No QI for arrest w/o PC and pft held for 80 days; lack of PC was obvious