Author Archives: Hall

Cato: LAPD Drones Threaten Privacy

Cato: LAPD Drones Threaten Privacy by Matthew Feeney:

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on Cato: LAPD Drones Threaten Privacy

Newsweek: Gun Cameras Might Be the Next Body Cameras as Police Try Them Out

Newsweek: Gun Cameras Might Be the Next Body Cameras as Police Try Them Out by Jessica Kwon: Gun cameras – mounted on officers’ weapons instead of their bodies – are the latest recording technology some police departments are considering adding … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on Newsweek: Gun Cameras Might Be the Next Body Cameras as Police Try Them Out

Cal.App., LA: Accepting deferred entry of judgment denies a statutory right to appeal denial of suppression motion

Having accepted deferred entry of judgment to resolve his criminal case, defendant had no statutory right to appeal the denial of his suppression motion. People v. Cortez, 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 891 (App.Div. Los Angeles Sept. 14, 2017). The search … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on Cal.App., LA: Accepting deferred entry of judgment denies a statutory right to appeal denial of suppression motion

M.D.Pa.: The fact def’s cell phone was used to call the CI was PC for search of the phone

Nexus was shown for defendant’s cell phone: “The affidavit described various calls made between the CI and defendant regarding the planning of the jewelry store robbery, the dates of the calls, as well as discussions about how the firearm needed … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: The fact def’s cell phone was used to call the CI was PC for search of the phone

E.D.Cal.: Probation search of cell phone was reasonable condition

Search of defendant’s cell phone as a probation search condition was reasonable. United States v. Canady, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169069 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2017). The officer did not have reasonable suspicion for a seizure of defendant’s vehicle because … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Probation search of cell phone was reasonable condition

Cert. granted: United States v. Microsoft Corp.

Cert. granted: United States v. Microsoft Corp., 17-2 (ScotusBlog) Issue: Whether a United States provider of email services must comply with a probable-cause-based warrant issued under 18 U.S.C. § 2703 by making disclosure in the United States of electronic communications … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on Cert. granted: United States v. Microsoft Corp.

Just Security: Surveillance “Reform”: The Fourth Amendment’s Long, Slow, Goodbye

Just Security: Surveillance “Reform”: The Fourth Amendment’s Long, Slow, Goodbye by Patrick Eddington:

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on Just Security: Surveillance “Reform”: The Fourth Amendment’s Long, Slow, Goodbye

PA: One def pleads state constitution and wins, one doesn’t and loses

Birchfield came down after the blood draw in this case. Defendant only pled the Fourth Amendment and did not cite the state constitution. There is no good faith exception to the Pennsylvania exclusionary rule, but there is to the federal, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, State constitution | Comments Off on PA: One def pleads state constitution and wins, one doesn’t and loses

WaPo: When is a Facebook ‘like’ a crime?

WaPo: When is a Facebook ‘like’ a crime? by Ann E. Marimow: The U.S. attorney’s office for D.C. told a judge Friday that the government has ‘little interest’ in obtaining the names of thousands of people who ‘liked’ the Facebook … Continue reading →

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on WaPo: When is a Facebook ‘like’ a crime?

N.D.Ill.: Compelling persons to provide fingerprints to unlock Apple devices doesn’t violation the self-incrimination clause of the Fifth Amendment

An order compelling persons to provide fingerprints to unlock Apple devices doesn’t violation the self-incrimination clause of the Fifth Amendment. In re Search Warrant Application for [Name Redacted by the Court], 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169384 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 18, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Compelling persons to provide fingerprints to unlock Apple devices doesn’t violation the self-incrimination clause of the Fifth Amendment

S.D.Ohio: “Failure to follow Internal Revenue manual does not mandate suppression of any evidence obtained in violation thereof.”

Tax records were collected in an audit.”Failure to follow Internal Revenue manual does not mandate suppression of any evidence obtained in violation thereof.” United States v. Wright, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167300 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 10, 2017). “[I]f an objectively … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: “Failure to follow Internal Revenue manual does not mandate suppression of any evidence obtained in violation thereof.”

S.D.N.Y.: Exclusion warranted for stop without RS

Two plainclothes officers jumped out of a car and approached to men who fled. The court finds the officers didn’t identify themselves. This wasn’t reasonable suspicion, and the court finds exclusion warranted for the police conduct. United States v. Bell, … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Exclusion warranted for stop without RS

D.Kan.: Consent to USM was to search for wanted man, and continuing search after finding him exceeded consent

Defendant’s consent was explicit: to search his house for a wanted man. When that man was found, the search had to end. Motion to suppress granted because officers exceeded the consent. United States v. Nelson, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164992 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Consent to USM was to search for wanted man, and continuing search after finding him exceeded consent

D.Nev.: Court gave a Franks hearing, but def didn’t make offer of proof to get one and failed on proof

Defendant got a suppression hearing to put on proof of a Franks violation, and he fails to show with any proof that the statements were reckless or material. Perhaps the court should have never ordered a hearing for a lack … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Court gave a Franks hearing, but def didn’t make offer of proof to get one and failed on proof

M.D.Tenn.: 6 day delay in installing a court ordered tracking device wasn’t unreasonable without a showing that PC dissipated

A six day delay in installing a court ordered tracking device wasn’t unreasonable without a showing that the probable cause dissipated in the meantime, and defendant didn’t. United States v. Thirkill, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166131 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 5, … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Inventory | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: 6 day delay in installing a court ordered tracking device wasn’t unreasonable without a showing that PC dissipated

Two on RS for immigration stops on RS

The Brignoni-Ponce factors on the totality showed reasonable suspicion. Defendant’s attempt to isolate the factors and provide innocent explanations for all doesn’t work because of Arvizu: there is still reasonable suspicion on the totality. United States v. Rivero, 2017 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on Two on RS for immigration stops on RS

CNN: Intel leaders urge Congress to reauthorize NSA surveillance program

CNN: Intel leaders urge Congress to reauthorize NSA surveillance program by David Shortell:

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on CNN: Intel leaders urge Congress to reauthorize NSA surveillance program

MA: Inventory was not shown to be pretextual and was within policy

The suppression hearing judge found the officer credible on the question of whether the inventory was pretextual and concluded it was not. As a credibility determination, it can’t be reversed on appeal. The inventory was otherwise reasonable. Commonwealth v. Ehiabhi, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Standards of review | Comments Off on MA: Inventory was not shown to be pretextual and was within policy

CA1: Using def’s keys to find his apt door was a “search” but it was still in GF even though that fact was in warrant application for apt

Defendant was arrested for drug dealing outside his apartment building. A search incident produced a set of keys. The police tried the keys on the apartment door until they worked. They didn’t enter but used the facts they’d developed plus … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Search | Comments Off on CA1: Using def’s keys to find his apt door was a “search” but it was still in GF even though that fact was in warrant application for apt

OH2: Somebody leaning in car window then leaving when police approach is not PC

Somebody leaning in the car window to talk to defendant then walking away as police approached is not probable cause to believe a drug deal just went down. Suppression motion should have been granted. State v. Ward, 2017-Ohio-8141, 2017 Ohio … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on OH2: Somebody leaning in car window then leaving when police approach is not PC