Author Archives: Hall

MN: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil eviction

The landlord was changing all the locks in an apartment complex for uniformity and warned the tenants. They showed up at defendant’s apartment and knocked, but defendant didn’t answer. They tried unlocking the door but the master key didn’t work. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on MN: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil eviction

NJ: Affidavit for SW doesn’t need to be turned over at bail hearing where arrest doesn’t rely on SW under NJ law

When the state is not relying on the product of a search warrant for its arrest warrant, it does not have to disclose the search warrant affidavit under state law at the detention hearing – it can wait until later … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NJ: Affidavit for SW doesn’t need to be turned over at bail hearing where arrest doesn’t rely on SW under NJ law

CA5: Ptf’s civil Franks claim survives QI; def officer omitted material exculpatory evidence that led to ptf’s 15 min aquittal of murder

Plaintiff spent 16 months in jail awaiting trial for murder. He was acquitted in 15 minutes. He sued all the officers. After a prior appeal (Winfrey v. San Jacinto Cty., 481 Fed. Appx. 969 (5th Cir. 2012)), all that remains … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf’s civil Franks claim survives QI; def officer omitted material exculpatory evidence that led to ptf’s 15 min aquittal of murder

GA: Affidavit as a whole made nexus with clear inference sought after evidence would be found

The affidavit for the search warrant as a whole made a clear inference that the evidence sought would be in the defendant’s house. The rule adopted by the court of appeals is too broad, but the decision is still affirmed. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on GA: Affidavit as a whole made nexus with clear inference sought after evidence would be found

Cato: The Fourth Amendment Still Applies Online

Cato: The Fourth Amendment Still Applies Online by Ilya Shapiro and Aaron Barnes:

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on Cato: The Fourth Amendment Still Applies Online

DE: Def’s crossing the unmarked center of a highway for a couple of seconds wasn’t RS

“Here, Trooper Freeman testified that ‘the only basis for the stop’ was that Defendant veered into the left lane on a roadway that did not have solid lines. Speed was not a factor. Absent any testimony or video evidence concerning … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: Def’s crossing the unmarked center of a highway for a couple of seconds wasn’t RS

Curious about the FISA process? See Just Security: It Ain’t Easy Getting a FISA Warrant: I Was an FBI Agent and Should Know

Just Security: It Ain’t Easy Getting a FISA Warrant: I Was an FBI Agent and Should Know by Asha Rangappa from March 2017.

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on Curious about the FISA process? See Just Security: It Ain’t Easy Getting a FISA Warrant: I Was an FBI Agent and Should Know

Ars Technica: Why cops [think they] won’t need a warrant to pull the data off your autonomous car

Ars Technica: Why cops won’t need a warrant to pull the data off your autonomous car by Cyrus Farivar. Said a local law enforcement officer: “It’s like instant replay in the NFL; I can tell what happened.”

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Ars Technica: Why cops [think they] won’t need a warrant to pull the data off your autonomous car

Just Security: “Dehumanized” at the Border, Travelers Push Back

Just Security: “Dehumanized” at the Border, Travelers Push Back by Carrie DeCell:

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on Just Security: “Dehumanized” at the Border, Travelers Push Back

NYTimes: Opinion: What It’s Like to Live in a Surveillance State

NYTimes: Opinion: What It’s Like to Live in a Surveillance State by James A. Millward:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: Opinion: What It’s Like to Live in a Surveillance State

NY4: CSLI obtained by exigency mere third party information not subject to suppression

Police discovered defendant may have been involved in a quadruple homicide, and they submitted an exigent circumstances request for his CSLI for the four days around the homicide, and that put him there. His motion to suppress the CSLI was … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NY4: CSLI obtained by exigency mere third party information not subject to suppression

W.D.La.: No clear authority says a state court tracking warrant can’t track a car into another state; GFE applies

There is no authority shown that a state court tracking warrant on a vehicle could or could not track the vehicle into another state. Therefore, the good faith exception would apply. United States v. Taylor, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17816 … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on W.D.La.: No clear authority says a state court tracking warrant can’t track a car into another state; GFE applies

W.D.Wash.: Exclusionary rule wouldn’t apply to USCG’s obtaining medical records of merchant mariners (dicta)

Plaintiff sued the Coast Guard because it subpoenaed his medical records for the merchant marine, something completely within its statutory and regulatory authority. The Coast Guard 40 years ago determined that the exclusionary rule wouldn’t be applied to medical records … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Exclusionary rule wouldn’t apply to USCG’s obtaining medical records of merchant mariners (dicta)

M.D.Fla.: Def’s admission he hadn’t used phone in a year when he left it where he last lived supported finding abandonment

During a knock-and-talk, defendant admitted that he had not used a particular cell phone in over a year because it had a cracked screen. He was kicked out of a house and he left it behind with other belongings. Based … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Def’s admission he hadn’t used phone in a year when he left it where he last lived supported finding abandonment

CA5: “The mistaken execution of a valid search warrant on the wrong premises does not automatically violate the Fourth Amendment”; officer gets qualified immunity

“The mistaken execution of a valid search warrant on the wrong premises does not automatically violate the Fourth Amendment.” The officers get qualified immunity for getting out when they discovered it. Thomas v. Williams, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 2478 (5th … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA5: “The mistaken execution of a valid search warrant on the wrong premises does not automatically violate the Fourth Amendment”; officer gets qualified immunity

NY2: Former evicted tenants back on premises were trespassers and had no REP

The landlord obtained legal process to evict the tenants in an apartment, and the City Marshal changed the locks. When the tenants reentered, they were trespassers and had no legal standing or reasonable expectation of privacy. People v. McCullum, 2018 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Curtilage, Standing | Comments Off on NY2: Former evicted tenants back on premises were trespassers and had no REP

NY4: Pinging cell phone was harmless error even if a warrant was required

The pinging of defendant’s cell phone to find him was without a warrant. If it was constitutional error, it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. People v. Moorer, 2018 NY Slip Op 00754, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 697 (4th … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: Pinging cell phone was harmless error even if a warrant was required

Lawfare: The Dubious Legal Claim Behind #ReleaseTheMemo

Lawfare: The Dubious Legal Claim Behind #ReleaseTheMemo by Orin Kerr: [Spoiler alert: I agree that it is more than dubious since two branches of our government have absolutely no clue what the Fourth Amendment means. It’s like a Franks challenge: … Continue reading →

Posted in FISA, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on Lawfare: The Dubious Legal Claim Behind #ReleaseTheMemo

D.Mass: Seeking CP from work computer created reasonable inference he’d have CP on home computer

The fact defendant sought out child pornography from his work computer, coupled with the fact he had internet access at home, made it a reasonable inference that child pornography would be on his home computer. United States v. Mantha, 2018 … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on D.Mass: Seeking CP from work computer created reasonable inference he’d have CP on home computer

PA: Furtive movements then refusing to remove hands from pockets was RS

On a report of a man with a gun, officers went to area and found defendant who didn’t exactly match the description. As they circled the block, defendant would change directions. When they pulled up next to him, which was … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on PA: Furtive movements then refusing to remove hands from pockets was RS