Author Archives: Hall

DE: Whether a state tracking warrant permits tracking in NJ is avoided in favor of inevitable discovery

A tracking device was put on defendant’s Jeep by warrant, and it was tracked into New Jersey as well. The court offers that it’s a difficult question whether the vehicle could be tracked in New Jersey too, but decides the … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on DE: Whether a state tracking warrant permits tracking in NJ is avoided in favor of inevitable discovery

CA9: Whether state officers violated state law in the search doesn’t matter in federal court under the 4A

Defendant argues that the officers violated Washington state law in his search and seizure. That doesn’t matter in federal court. United States v. Dauenhauer, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 34797 (9th Cir. Dec. 11, 2018). Under Hudson, “The federal exclusionary rule, … Continue reading →

Posted in Conflict of laws, Knock and announce | Comments Off on CA9: Whether state officers violated state law in the search doesn’t matter in federal court under the 4A

CA5: Officers get QI for body cavity search with SW that turned up nothing

Plaintiff’s pat down at the jail after a valid arrest led officers to believe that he had something protruding from his anus. He denied anything was there, and he refused to consent to removing it. Officers got a search warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Officers get QI for body cavity search with SW that turned up nothing

TN: Apparent authority to consent also determines standing

Apparent authority to consent is also standing. Lack of apparent authority to consent is no standing. State v. Madewell, 2018 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 896 (Dec. 12, 2018). The smell of marijuana was probable cause for the search of defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on TN: Apparent authority to consent also determines standing

M.D.Tenn.: Def was sitting in car on friend’s curtilage visiting the friend, and officer violated curtilage to look in car window

Defendant was in his car on another person’s curtilage when he was there to visit. The officer’s walking up to the car on the curtilage of the owner to look in defendant’s car window violated the Fourth Amendment. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Def was sitting in car on friend’s curtilage visiting the friend, and officer violated curtilage to look in car window

W.D.Wash.: 4 month delay in producing evidence from iPod doesn’t warrant dismissal

The fact something was extracted from defendant’s iPod in April but not turned over to the defense until August isn’t a ground to dismiss. United States v. Taylor, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206364 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 7, 2018). There was … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: 4 month delay in producing evidence from iPod doesn’t warrant dismissal

CA6: 2255 argument that def counsel didn’t make “best arguments for suppression” fails; he’d still lose

“Maurice Carter pled guilty to a variety of sex crimes and received a twenty-year prison sentence. He now petitions for habeas relief. Carter alleges his attorneys were constitutionally ineffective for failing to make the best arguments for suppression of key … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA6: 2255 argument that def counsel didn’t make “best arguments for suppression” fails; he’d still lose

CA6: Def’s IAC argument that suppression argument could have been better made fails because it wouldn’t prevail in any event

“Maurice Carter pled guilty to a variety of sex crimes and received a twenty-year prison sentence. He now petitions for habeas relief. Carter alleges his attorneys were constitutionally ineffective for failing to make the best arguments for suppression of key … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA6: Def’s IAC argument that suppression argument could have been better made fails because it wouldn’t prevail in any event

D.Utah: Def lacked standing in an apt rented for him he knew was by identity theft

Defendant lacked standing to contest a search of the apartment he knew was rented by another for him via identity theft. United States v. Kafuku, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207331 (D. Utah Dec. 8, 2018):

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.Utah: Def lacked standing in an apt rented for him he knew was by identity theft

GA: Guest had standing but he was subject to owner’s consenting

Defendant had standing as an overnight guest, but he was subject to the consent of the owner. Here, the owner did. Doleman v. State, 2018 Ga. LEXIS 791 (Dec. 10, 2018). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for embracing the fact that … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on GA: Guest had standing but he was subject to owner’s consenting

MA: Def’s clothes can be seized and searched for trace evidence on arrest for murder

When defendant was arrested for kidnapping and murder, exigent circumstances justified seizing and then searching defendant’s clothes for trace evidence of the crime. Commonwealth v. Parker, 2018 Mass. LEXIS 807 (Dec. 7, 2018). A dead body near defendant’s apartment with … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on MA: Def’s clothes can be seized and searched for trace evidence on arrest for murder

N.D.Miss.: Use of a smartphone app to translate request for consent was mooted by valid Spanish consent form

The officer used a smartphone translation application which has been disapproved of by other courts. Here, however, defendant also got a form in correct Spanish, and that overcame the use of the app. United States v. Salemi-Nicoloso, 2018 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Private search | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: Use of a smartphone app to translate request for consent was mooted by valid Spanish consent form

New Law Review Article: Cross-Enforcement of the Fourth Amendment by Orin Kerr

Cross-Enforcement of the Fourth Amendment, 132 Harv. L. Rev. 471 (2018), by Orin Kerr. Abstract:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on New Law Review Article: Cross-Enforcement of the Fourth Amendment by Orin Kerr

WI: Body camera video showed def just went along with directions and didn’t consent; if there was consent, it was revoked

The body camera video showed neither exigency nor consent for the entry into defendant’s apartment. Silently going along with the officer’s several directives, not requests, didn’t show that defendant consented. Even if defendant had consented, the attempt to close the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on WI: Body camera video showed def just went along with directions and didn’t consent; if there was consent, it was revoked

CA7: Cell phone SW that permitted viewing all files of phone was not too “general”

A search warrant for the entire contents of a cell phone was particular and not a general warrant considering that the warrant sought evidence of “criminal recklessness with a deadly weapon” or related to drug dealing. United States v. Bishop, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, General warrant | Comments Off on CA7: Cell phone SW that permitted viewing all files of phone was not too “general”

National Law Review: With Wide-Spread Legalization of Marijuana, Has A Public Employer’s Ability to Test for Marijuana Gone up In Smoke?

National Law Review: With Wide-Spread Legalization of Marijuana, Has A Public Employer’s Ability to Test for Marijuana Gone up In Smoke? by Ryan P. Heiden:

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on National Law Review: With Wide-Spread Legalization of Marijuana, Has A Public Employer’s Ability to Test for Marijuana Gone up In Smoke?

KS: Even with roadside Miranda violation, PC still exists under the 4A without the statement

Defendant’s statement at the side of the road was taken in violation of Miranda and should have been suppressed. This does not affect, however, the Fourth Amendment analysis of whether there was probable cause because there was without the statement. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on KS: Even with roadside Miranda violation, PC still exists under the 4A without the statement

KS: Def was already stopped when police approached; he got out of car and locked it and was arrested; no possessory interest involved when a drug dog sniffed his locked parked car

Defendant was stopped on a grocery store parking lot, got out of the car, and locked it. He was searched incident to arrest. A little later a drug dog came and stiffed the car. Defendant was deprived of no possessory … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Seizure | Comments Off on KS: Def was already stopped when police approached; he got out of car and locked it and was arrested; no possessory interest involved when a drug dog sniffed his locked parked car

D.Minn.: Def succeeds in his Franks offer of proof; PC doubtful

Defendant succeeds in his Franks offer of proof. The omitted information undermines probable cause, and a hearing will be held. United States v. Reed, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206986 (D. Minn. Dec. 7, 2018):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def succeeds in his Franks offer of proof; PC doubtful

NYTimes: Your Apps Know Where You Were Last Night, and They’re Not Keeping It Secret

NYTimes: Your Apps Know Where You Were Last Night, and They’re Not Keeping It Secret by Jennifer Valentino-DeVries, Natasha Singer, Michael H. Keller and Aaron Krolik: Dozens of companies use smartphone locations to help advertisers and even hedge funds. They … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: Your Apps Know Where You Were Last Night, and They’re Not Keeping It Secret