TN: Apparent authority to consent also determines standing

Apparent authority to consent is also standing. Lack of apparent authority to consent is no standing. State v. Madewell, 2018 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 896 (Dec. 12, 2018).

The smell of marijuana was probable cause for the search of defendant’s car. United States v. Mitchell, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208851 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 29, 2018),* adopted, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207517 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 7, 2018).*

“In the wiretap context, [the particularity] requirements are satisfied by identification of the telephone line to be tapped and the particular conversations to be seized.” United States v. Campos, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207456 (D.D.C. Dec. 10, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Apparent authority. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.