Daily Archives: February 7, 2025

CA6: Impeaching def’s trial testimony about the search of his property using his proffer agreement was prejudicial, but harmless

Impeaching defendant’s trial testimony about the search of his property using his proffer agreement was prejudicial, but it was harmless on this record. They could have cross-examined without it. United States v. Grogan, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 2354 (6th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Inventory, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Impeaching def’s trial testimony about the search of his property using his proffer agreement was prejudicial, but harmless

D.S.D.: Tribal officers governed by 4A and Indian Civil Rights Act

“The Fourth Amendment, not ICRA, applies here. For one thing, BIA officers are federal officers empowered by federal statute to act. For another, even if Dillon and Flute subjectively believed they were enforcing tribal law—which the Court is convinced of—they … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Tribal officers governed by 4A and Indian Civil Rights Act

CA9: Knock-and-announce failure doesn’t lead to suppression

Knock-and-announce failure doesn’t lead to suppression. United States v. Benlevi, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 2452 (9th Cir. Feb. 4, 2025). Police were called to a motel where a vehicle was illegally parked in a handicapped zone for an hour allegedly … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Knock and announce, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Knock-and-announce failure doesn’t lead to suppression

D.Minn.: Rehashing 4A argument to USMJ isn’t a proper objection to the R&R

Defendant’s general objections to the R&R on his search claims don’t attempt to show the alleged errors in the USMJ’s reasoning and just rehashed the original arguments. Overruled, and adopted. United States v. Shaka, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19267 (D. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Rehashing 4A argument to USMJ isn’t a proper objection to the R&R

OH5: Drug dog officer’s touching car to redirect dog wasn’t a search

The officer’s briefly touching the vehicle’s exterior to redirect the canine’s focus did not constitute a search. The dog’s certification and training were sufficient to establish its reliability, absent conflicting evidence from the defendant. This traffic stop was not unconstitutionally … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Search, Staleness | Comments Off on OH5: Drug dog officer’s touching car to redirect dog wasn’t a search