Monthly Archives: March 2024

D.Idaho: Cellphone warrant was not sufficiently particular and is suppressed; Gmail account not suppressed

The Google email search warrant was sufficiently particular to narrow the search to documents pertaining to a particular land transaction. The search warrant for defendant’s Apple phone and accounts, however, was insufficiently particular and is suppressed. The affidavit attempted to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, E-mail, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Cellphone warrant was not sufficiently particular and is suppressed; Gmail account not suppressed

GA: Officer didn’t have to distinguish between smell of MJ, hemp, and CBD to have PC to search car

Under existing precedent, the smell of suspected marijuana couldn’t be distinguished between hemp and CBD, and that was still probable cause for search of the car. Coverstone v. State, 2024 Ga. App. LEXIS 90 (Mar. 4, 2024). “First, Officer Murphy … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Officer didn’t have to distinguish between smell of MJ, hemp, and CBD to have PC to search car

AP: A woman wins $3.8 million verdict after SWAT team searches wrong home based on Find My iPhone app

AP: A woman wins $3.8 million verdict after SWAT team searches wrong home based on Find My iPhone app by Colleen Slevin:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on AP: A woman wins $3.8 million verdict after SWAT team searches wrong home based on Find My iPhone app

CA9: Two controlled buys by others afterward going to def’s house was nexus

Nexus to defendant’s house was shown by two controlled buys with others who traveled back to his house afterward. United States v. Espinoza, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 5147 (9th Cir. Mar. 4, 2024). “The warrant for appellant’s medical records was … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Two controlled buys by others afterward going to def’s house was nexus

N.D.Ohio: Being the target of a search doesn’t automatically establish standing

Being the target of a search doesn’t automatically establish standing. There were four packages here sent under assumed names to assumed names. The anticipatory warrant was based on probable cause. United States v. Taylor, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36749 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Being the target of a search doesn’t automatically establish standing

N.D.Ga.: Assuming without deciding standing to challenge a college email account, there was PC for the email warrant

Defendant sent threatening emails through his Georgia Tech account. He also sent private emails with tax and property information. He raised a Franks challenge, too. Assuming without deciding he has standing to challenge the email search, there was probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, E-mail, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Assuming without deciding standing to challenge a college email account, there was PC for the email warrant

M.D.Pa.: Ordering driver out of car doesn’t extend it for Rodriguez purposes

Ordering the driver out of the car is incidental to the mission of the stop and doesn’t extend it for Rodriguez purpses. United States v. Brabham, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36681 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2024). While the smell of … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Ordering driver out of car doesn’t extend it for Rodriguez purposes

D.Conn.: That accomplices communicated by text messaging justified SW for cell phone

This cell phone was with probable cause and was particular. “Here, the warrant affidavits clearly established probable cause to conclude that Sinisterra was involved in all three shootings described therein. He was implicated by two individuals who corroborated each other … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Conn.: That accomplices communicated by text messaging justified SW for cell phone

D.Utah: Automobile exception permits search under the hood

The automobile exception permits a search under the hood, even if it is not the most likely spot to find drugs and a weapon. Here, a clip was found in the car, and the gun it belonged to under the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Utah: Automobile exception permits search under the hood

Reason: Yes, Warrants Allow a Search Through the Whole Phone

Reason: Yes, Warrants Allow a Search Through the Whole Phone by Orin S. Kerr (“A comment on a mistaken way to limit computer searches— focusing on People v. Carson from the Michigan Court of Appeals.”):

Posted in Cell phones, Scope of search | Comments Off on Reason: Yes, Warrants Allow a Search Through the Whole Phone

D.Kan.: Cross-designated state-federal officer was “federal officer” for assault charge during execution of SW

Assaulting a state officer cross-designated as a federal officer qualified for assaulting a federal officer during execution of a search warrant. United States v. Butler, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36172 (D. Kan. Mar. 1, 2024). The state courts did not … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d), Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Cross-designated state-federal officer was “federal officer” for assault charge during execution of SW

UT: Emergency aid exception permitted entry for apparent homicide victim who was missing

The emergency aid exception permitted entry into this murder scene. The victim was the grandmother of a child who punctually picked the child up every day at school. When she didn’t show for hours, the school notified police. They went … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Emergency / exigency, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on UT: Emergency aid exception permitted entry for apparent homicide victim who was missing