Category Archives: Seizure

LA4: Protective sweep before def arrested in pajamas reentered to get dressed was reasonable

Defendant was arrested in his pajamas, and it was appropriate for the police to conduct a protective sweep for others before he was permitted to get dressed to leave. A shotgun was validly found propped against the wall in the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inventory, Protective sweep, Seizure, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on LA4: Protective sweep before def arrested in pajamas reentered to get dressed was reasonable

WA: Ex parte order freezing criminal def’s bank account was not functional equivalent of a SW and unreasonable

An ex parte order to freeze a bank account of a theft suspect violated the Washington Constitution because bank records are protected there. The trial court’s order was without legal authority, and it was not the functional equivalent of a … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on WA: Ex parte order freezing criminal def’s bank account was not functional equivalent of a SW and unreasonable

TX6: “[U]nder Rodriguez, Fourth Amendment considerations are both qualitative and temporal”

The smell of marijuana on defendant’s clothing noticed during the traffic stop and his heavily sweating during the stop although the temperature was in the high 20’s to low 30’s and travel plans that were suspicious all added up to … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on TX6: “[U]nder Rodriguez, Fourth Amendment considerations are both qualitative and temporal”

IL: When a stop is based on an “investigative alert,” the basis has to be shown to be reasonable; here, the state couldn’t

Defendant was stopped on an “investigative alert,” which would have been sufficient if there was reasonable suspicion under the collective knowledge doctrine. There was no showing of the basis for the alert, and the stop was thus without reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on IL: When a stop is based on an “investigative alert,” the basis has to be shown to be reasonable; here, the state couldn’t

UT: Officer’s testimony about consent was hearsay but not inadmissible or excludable

The officer’s description of consent to search a truck driven by another was not inadmissible hearsay. The effort to show that it was unreliable was insufficient, and it was not so unreliable to be excludable. State v. Clark, 2015 UT … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Seizure | Comments Off on UT: Officer’s testimony about consent was hearsay but not inadmissible or excludable

CA6: Def’s failure to submit to officer’s show of authority showed it was not a seizure

“The United States appeals the district court’s order suppressing a firearm found in defendant Samuel Johnson’s car during a traffic stop. The district court ruled that because the police had unconstitutionally seized Johnson before he rolled through a stop sign, … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Def’s failure to submit to officer’s show of authority showed it was not a seizure

IA: Use of siren and commands about where to stand during stop was a seizure

“Here, the evidence establishes that Officer Aljets exercised his authority to request Williams stop, rendering the encounter a seizure. The officer testified he ‘hit the siren horn’ which made a ‘whoop whoop’ sound in order to get Williams’s attention. The … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on IA: Use of siren and commands about where to stand during stop was a seizure

ID: Auto search doesn’t have to stop where items in plain view were seized

Observation of contraband in plain view justified a search of a vehicle. The officer did not have to stop when he seized that which was first seen. State v. Anderson, 2015 Ida. App. LEXIS 118 (Nov. 17, 2015). Defendant was … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure | Comments Off on ID: Auto search doesn’t have to stop where items in plain view were seized

GA: Overlong stop was reasonable here because officer was dealing with two cars

Defendant was not seized, although the stop was long. There was another driver in another car also being dealt with, and the officer had to get another to the scene. Defendant was never told he was under arrest, nor was … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on GA: Overlong stop was reasonable here because officer was dealing with two cars

CA10: Seizure of def’s unlabeled bag from Amtrak baggage car to carry it through train was a Fourth Amendment seizure

Defendant was riding Amtrak from Los Angeles which stops in Albuquerque. As usual, the DEA boarded the train. After a walk through they seized defendant’s unlabeled bag from the baggage car and carried it through the train looking for its … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA10: Seizure of def’s unlabeled bag from Amtrak baggage car to carry it through train was a Fourth Amendment seizure

D.D.C.: Asking a man on the street to pull up shirt to expose waistband is not a seizure

Under D.C.Cir. case law, an officer driving by a person in a high crime area and asking him to pull up his shirt or expose his waistband is not a seizure. Here, officers did that with a small group and … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Asking a man on the street to pull up shirt to expose waistband is not a seizure

TN: Motion for return of property doesn’t require a motion to suppress and can come after judgment

A state motion for return of property does not require a motion to suppress. “Additionally, the State’s argument that the trial court lacks jurisdiction because the judgment has become final is misplaced. The Defendant is not seeking to challenge his … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Seizure | Comments Off on TN: Motion for return of property doesn’t require a motion to suppress and can come after judgment

UT: Police car’s overhead lights usually mean seizure to the motorist the police car is behind

A police car’s overhead lights can be ambiguous, but, to the motorist, they mean you are stopped and should not attempt to leave. It’s common knowledge the consequences of not staying stopped could be severe. Defendant was thus stopped, but … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Seizure | Comments Off on UT: Police car’s overhead lights usually mean seizure to the motorist the police car is behind

CA6: Officers’ civil assist ended up in stating a claim in the retaking of a car

Officers were on a civil assist in aiding repossession of a car that was involved in a family dispute going back and forth for a couple of years. “Viewing the record in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, we agree … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Officers’ civil assist ended up in stating a claim in the retaking of a car

DC: Custody for Miranda and Fifth Amendment purposes may be different than custody for Fourth Amendment purposes

Custody for Miranda and Fifth Amendment purposes may be different than custody for Fourth Amendment purposes. Morton v. United States, 2015 D.C. App. LEXIS 516 (Oct. 29, 2015):

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on DC: Custody for Miranda and Fifth Amendment purposes may be different than custody for Fourth Amendment purposes

OH9: Ordering a person out of a car at gunpoint after a stop is a seizure

Ordering a person out of a car at gunpoint after a stop is a seizure even if based on an alleged furtive movement. The stop was based on a robbery report, and this vehicle was more than a half mile … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH9: Ordering a person out of a car at gunpoint after a stop is a seizure

OH7: Burning MJ coming from an apartment is a misdemeanor and not sufficient exigency to enter

Police answered a loud music call at 5 am in an apartment building, and they could smell burning marijuana outside defendant’s apartment door. Burning marijuana is a misdemeanor and not sufficient exigency for a police entry. A 1995 Ohio case … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH7: Burning MJ coming from an apartment is a misdemeanor and not sufficient exigency to enter

IL: A forced chemical test of the blood two days after an accident was after the reduced REP of a driver had lapsed

A chemical test of appellant’s blood violated the Fourth Amendment because the police sought a chemical test two days after the car accident when plaintiff no longer had a diminished expectation of privacy. McElwain v. Office of the Ill. Secy. … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on IL: A forced chemical test of the blood two days after an accident was after the reduced REP of a driver had lapsed

CA2: Ordering a person to leave a courthouse is likely not a seizure, but grabbing his collar and forcing him to move is a seizure

Ordering a person to leave a courthouse is likely not a seizure. Grabbing his collar and forcing him to move is a seizure. It is subject to the reasonableness requirement. Salmon v. Blesser, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 16070 (2d Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA2: Ordering a person to leave a courthouse is likely not a seizure, but grabbing his collar and forcing him to move is a seizure

E.D.Pa.: IAC claim has to say what def counsel didn’t try to suppress

An ineffective assistance claim that says defense counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress without saying what should have been suppressed states no claim at all. [It would also have to say that it would have been granted … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: IAC claim has to say what def counsel didn’t try to suppress