Category Archives: Excessive force

MI: 4A not violated by taking of fingerprints and photographs during a Terry stop

Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment rights were not violated by police officers taking their photographs and fingerprints based on reasonable suspicion during valid Terry stops, because plaintiffs had no reasonable expectation of privacy in physical characteristics that were constantly exposed to the … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: 4A not violated by taking of fingerprints and photographs during a Terry stop

NY4: Summary judgment on false arrest and excessive force claim without considering officers’ testimony in underlying criminal trial was error

Summary judgment against the defendants for false arrest and excessive force was improperly granted without considering the transcript of plaintiff’s criminal trial and the officers’ testimony there. Hernandez v Denny’s Corp., 2019 NY Slip Op 08302, 2019 N.Y. App. Div. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: Summary judgment on false arrest and excessive force claim without considering officers’ testimony in underlying criminal trial was error

CA4: Ptf shot and paralyzed during no-knock raid states a claim and survives QI

During a no-knock entry with a battering ram by plain-clothes officers for marijuana, plaintiff heard a commotion from the back of his house, reached for a gun, and was shot at 29 times, hit 9 times, and paralyzed. The officer … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Knock and announce, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Ptf shot and paralyzed during no-knock raid states a claim and survives QI

CA11: Factual dispute as to where misd arrest occurred, in the house or out, denies QI; it appears force used was excessive

Arguable probable cause supported plaintiff’s misdemeanor arrest, but there is a factual dispute denying qualified immunity to the officers of where exactly the arrest started and how it ended up indoors. That remains for trial. The complaint also survives on … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Factual dispute as to where misd arrest occurred, in the house or out, denies QI; it appears force used was excessive

GA: REP in a hotel room expires at checkout time

The reasonable expectation of privacy in a hotel room expires with the checkout time. Lindsey v. State, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 623 (Oct. 29, 2019). The defendant officers were properly entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s excessive force claim. Also, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Excessive force, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA: REP in a hotel room expires at checkout time

CA3: Body cavity search for baggie of drugs was reasonable because of exigency of risk of overdose

Plaintiff’s body cavity search for a baggie of drugs in her vagina was reasonable by exigent circumstances because of a legitimate fear that she could be harmed and overdose if the bag leaked. Carbone v. Salem, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Emergency / exigency, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA3: Body cavity search for baggie of drugs was reasonable because of exigency of risk of overdose

E.D.Wis.: “the issue is not whether the affiant omitted information the issuing judge may have found relevant; rather, the focus is on the affiant’s state of mind.”

“As indicated, however, the issue is not whether the affiant omitted information the issuing judge may have found relevant; rather, the focus is on the affiant’s state of mind. United States v. Jones, 208 F.3d 603, 607 (7th Cir. 2000). … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: “the issue is not whether the affiant omitted information the issuing judge may have found relevant; rather, the focus is on the affiant’s state of mind.”

CA6: Merely alleging pat-down search was done “without a legitimate reason” doesn’t state a 4A claim; more required

“Merely alleging that Jones’ conducting pat-down searches ‘without a legitimate reason’ is insufficient to state a plausible claim of a Fourth Amendment violation. Under the Fourth Amendment, ‘[t]he touchstone of whether a given search or seizure is reasonable is whether … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Merely alleging pat-down search was done “without a legitimate reason” doesn’t state a 4A claim; more required

E.D.Pa.: Protective sweep was properly limited and cell phones in plain view could be seized if it was readily apparent they were evidence

The officers’ protective sweep was justified by the facts, and it was constrained to areas large enough to hide a person. In plain view were two cell phones that were properly seized and then later searched with a warrant. United … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Protective sweep was properly limited and cell phones in plain view could be seized if it was readily apparent they were evidence

D.Minn.: Def was a parole absconder with a cell phone; PC existed for a warrant for a ping of the cell phone to find him

Defendant was a state parole absconder, and the officers got a warrant for a tracking order on the phone to find him, and it was issued with probable cause he’d be found with his phone. In any event, the good … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def was a parole absconder with a cell phone; PC existed for a warrant for a ping of the cell phone to find him

ABC News: After police shot the wrong man, city’s lawyer argues man didn’t have constitutional rights because he was undocumented

ABC News: After police shot the wrong man, city’s lawyer argues man didn’t have constitutional rights because he was undocumented by Meghan Kenally. Except undocumented people have Fourth Amendment rights. I.N.S. v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032 (1984).

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on ABC News: After police shot the wrong man, city’s lawyer argues man didn’t have constitutional rights because he was undocumented

Forbes: Sleeper Supreme Court Case Could Make Suing Rogue Federal Agents Almost Impossible

Forbes: Sleeper Supreme Court Case Could Make Suing Rogue Federal Agents Almost Impossible by Nick Sibilla:

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Forbes: Sleeper Supreme Court Case Could Make Suing Rogue Federal Agents Almost Impossible

CA3: Ptf’s stabbing a police dog, which he threatened to do if they had it attack him, didn’t justify deadly force in shooting him seven times

Police were in a stand off with plaintiff who had a knife, and they had guns and a dog. Frustrated that he wouldn’t comply, officers threatened to unleash the dog on him if he didn’t put down the knife. Plaintiff … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA3: Ptf’s stabbing a police dog, which he threatened to do if they had it attack him, didn’t justify deadly force in shooting him seven times

CA2: US citizen jailed without PC as an undocumented immigrant states a FTCA claim

A federal tort claims act case was properly stated for an American citizen plaintiff’s four day detention in an immigration facility as lacking probable cause. Hernandez v. United States, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 28081 (2d Cir. Sept. 17, 2019). Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Immigration arrests, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: US citizen jailed without PC as an undocumented immigrant states a FTCA claim

OH6: Trial court didn’t commit plain error in not inquiring into drug dog’s training when defense didn’t

The trial court did not commit plain error in not inquiring into the drug dogs training when defendant didn’t raise it. State v. Jones, 2019-Ohio-3704, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3777 (6th Dist. Sept. 16, 2019). The particulars of a drug … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Excessive force, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH6: Trial court didn’t commit plain error in not inquiring into drug dog’s training when defense didn’t

IL: Disorderly conduct can justify a Terry stop

Police received a 911 call about a man with a blue hoodie on a bicycle shouting profanities. Because the call was to 911 and recorded and logged with caller ID, it was more reliable. On seeing the man, the officer … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: Disorderly conduct can justify a Terry stop

CA6: Tightening handcuffs more when arrestee complains and threatening her life overcame QI

“A group of masked City of Detroit police officers broke down plaintiff Katrina McGrew’s door, threw her to the ground, and handcuffed her so tightly it left bruises. When she complained about how constricting the handcuffs were, the officers threatened … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA6: Tightening handcuffs more when arrestee complains and threatening her life overcame QI

VI: RS exists on smell of marijuana in a car even though locally small amounts of MJ was decriminalized

Despite decriminalization of small amounts of marijuana in VI, reasonable suspicion of possession of a small amount of marijuana is still contraband (an issue already settled here) that can justify a stop. Here, officers were watching a high crime area … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VI: RS exists on smell of marijuana in a car even though locally small amounts of MJ was decriminalized

OH5: Failure to put SW affidavit into evidence denies review of PC determination

Appellant failed to put the affidavit for search warrant into evidence at the suppression hearing, so it is unavailable for review on whether it showed probable cause. State v. Hill, 2019-Ohio-3432, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3524 (5th Dist. Aug. 27, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Excessive force, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH5: Failure to put SW affidavit into evidence denies review of PC determination

CA10: Dist Ct credited that defendant was “unusually nervous” rather than just “nervous” as a contributing factor to RS

The district court credited that defendant was “unusually nervous” rather than just “nervous” as a contributing factor to reasonable suspicion. Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and the officer asked for consent to search. Defendant asked what would happen … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Dist Ct credited that defendant was “unusually nervous” rather than just “nervous” as a contributing factor to RS