Category Archives: § 1983 / Bivens

CA7: USDC misapplies Heck by assuming challenged search was reasonable

The district court misapplied the Heck doctrine by assuming the search of plaintiff’s car was reasonable. The real question is whether the suit is to challenge the legality of the search. “On remand, the judge will need to resolve the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abstention | Comments Off on CA7: USDC misapplies Heck by assuming challenged search was reasonable

CA11: Ptf’s excessive force claim overcomes QI; his facts show clearly established law violated

Defendants were properly denied qualified immunity in using excessive force to arrest plaintiff. Plaintiff’s version of the facts showed clearly established rights were violated. Heck v. Humphrey didn’t apply because plaintiff wasn’t seeking to attack his conviction. Cendan v. Trujillo, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Ptf’s excessive force claim overcomes QI; his facts show clearly established law violated

CA7: Ptf’s $1 verdict for illegal search after successful suppression affirmed; what is proximate cause?

Plaintiff’s 1983 claim for illegal search which resulted in suppression in state court resulted in a $1 verdict. A fascinating opinion on proximate cause of damages and a Fourth and Fifth Amendment violation which is worth the read for future … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf’s $1 verdict for illegal search after successful suppression affirmed; what is proximate cause?

S.D.Ga.: Suspicionless probation search condition doesn’t need to be part of the sentencing order to be valid

Defendant was properly subject to a suspicionless state probation condition. He had no right to have it announced in court as a part of the sentence. It occurs by operation of law. United States v. Linder, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Suspicionless probation search condition doesn’t need to be part of the sentencing order to be valid

S.D.Miss.: Govt plans to file forfeiture so motion for return of cash denied

Claimant business’s motion for return of $895k from its bank account under Rule 41(g) is denied for lack of irreparable harm, based also on the government’s representation it’s going to attempt forfeiture. “Turning to the fourth factor, the Court finds … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Forfeiture, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: Govt plans to file forfeiture so motion for return of cash denied

MD: Daylight strip search on the side of highway was unreasonable

“The non-exigent visual inspection of the genital area of a person suspected of concealing controlled dangerous substances, in daylight, while the person stood between two police cruisers with emergency lights flashing, along the shoulder of an interstate highway, as moderate … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Strip search | Comments Off on MD: Daylight strip search on the side of highway was unreasonable

CA6: Ptf arrested for a police parody Facebook page has much of case survive QI on retaliatory arrest

Plaintiff made a parody Facebook page of the Parma Police Department which ultimately led to his arrest for impeding police operations because the Parma Police had to field 12 minutes of phone calls over which was the real Facebook page. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Ptf arrested for a police parody Facebook page has much of case survive QI on retaliatory arrest

CA1: Police chief’s order to officer to turn over cellphone and home phone records not a constitutional violation under third-party doctrine; chief gets qualified immunity

Plaintiff is a police officer, and the chief ordered production of his cell phone and home phone records in an internal investigation. The chief gets qualified immunity because of the third party doctrine. Those records were obtainable by subpoena from … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA1: Police chief’s order to officer to turn over cellphone and home phone records not a constitutional violation under third-party doctrine; chief gets qualified immunity

CA9: Use of tear gas to enter house, even where consent given, was not clearly unreasonable considering a dangerous, potentially armed, and suicidal felon was barricaded inside

“The panel held that assuming the consent was voluntary and defendants exceeded the scope of the consent by shooting tear gas into the house, they were still entitled to qualified immunity. The panel held that given that defendants thought they … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Use of tear gas to enter house, even where consent given, was not clearly unreasonable considering a dangerous, potentially armed, and suicidal felon was barricaded inside

CA4: Arrest for obstruction wasn’t objectively justified and QI denied

The actions of the plaintiff didn’t reasonably rise to the level of obstruction of an officer, and her arrest and throwing her to the ground was unjustified. Qualified immunity is denied. Hupp v. Cook, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 22208 (4th … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Arrest for obstruction wasn’t objectively justified and QI denied

CA9: Officer who drafted clearly overbroad SW doesn’t get qualified immunity just because a judge signed off on it

The officer who drafted a clearly overbroad warrant that a judge approved that sought diaries and other papers wasn’t entitled to qualified immunity. Estate of Brown v. Lambert, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 22087 (9th Cir. July 24, 2019). Plaintiff’s decedent … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Overbreadth, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Officer who drafted clearly overbroad SW doesn’t get qualified immunity just because a judge signed off on it

E.D.Mich.: Ptf’s guilty plea was collateral estoppel to his § 1983 search claim

Plaintiff’s civil search claim was barred by collateral estoppel by his guilty plea that there was sufficient evidence to convict. The officer gets qualified immunity for relying on a search warrant. Dabish v. McMahon, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121399 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Ptf’s guilty plea was collateral estoppel to his § 1983 search claim

CA5: Revd for failure to determine “clearly established law” for QI

“Both parties and the district court failed to address qualified immunity’s second question. The district court did not consider whether Defendants’ conduct—even assuming it violated the Fourth Amendment—violated clearly established law. See Morrow, 917 F.3d at 874. McDonald points to … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Revd for failure to determine “clearly established law” for QI

CA11: Officers get QI for stop of apparent burglars

The defendant officers’ actions were justified and subject to qualified immunity. They were patrolling an area known for daytime burglaries and saw plaintiff lurking along the side of homes and stopped to inquire and found that one house was open. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Officers get QI for stop of apparent burglars

D.Conn.: Ptf’s § 1983 case over his search that led to his conviction is barred by Heck

Plaintiff’s suit against his search and seizure that led to his conviction is barred by Heck v. Humphrey. “The appropriate vehicle for such a challenge is not § 1983 litigation, but direct or collateral appeal.” Gonzalez v. Yepes, 2019 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abstention | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Ptf’s § 1983 case over his search that led to his conviction is barred by Heck

LA3: State showed abandonment of car at hearing even though trial court decided on other grounds

The state argued and showed abandonment, but the trial court didn’t decide it. On appeal, the court finds that defendant abandoned his car after a police chase and he bailed out of the car and ran. State v. Guidry, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abandonment, Standards of review | Comments Off on LA3: State showed abandonment of car at hearing even though trial court decided on other grounds

CA8: Lack of knock-and-announce for parole search gets QI despite fact no case says it’s lawful; no “robust consensus of cases of persuasive authority”

Plaintiff absconded parolee was subjected to an unannounced entry into his hotel room about 6 am for a parole search. He was in bed with his girlfriend and a gun. The Arkansas Supreme Court held the entry violated the Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Knock and announce, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Lack of knock-and-announce for parole search gets QI despite fact no case says it’s lawful; no “robust consensus of cases of persuasive authority”

D.Ariz.: FTCA doesn’t provide a damages remedy for how SW executed

FTCA doesn’t provide a damages remedy for how a search warrant is executed. Lopez v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102516 (D. Ariz. June 19, 2019) The officer’s body camera video showed one of the passengers wasn’t wearing a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: FTCA doesn’t provide a damages remedy for how SW executed

E.D.Mich.: Jones didn’t alter the automobile exception

The automobile exception is intact as it always was, and Jones didn’t do anything to change the calculus. United States v. Lee, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99900 (E.D. Mich. June 14, 2019). The government proved that it would have otherwise … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Knock and talk, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Jones didn’t alter the automobile exception

CA6: No QI immunity in an alleged unreasonable opposite sex strip search at jail with alleged unreasonable touching

Plaintiff overcame qualified immunity in her suit against five male jailers who stripped searched her and allegedly touched her genitalia and breasts when she was nude in wrestling her on the floor at book-in. Because of a spit mask they … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: No QI immunity in an alleged unreasonable opposite sex strip search at jail with alleged unreasonable touching