Category Archives: § 1983 / Bivens

N.D.Ohio: Ptf shows Franks violation for leaving out important mitigating information; officer also had apparent motive

Defendant satisfied his Franks burden of showing a material false statement in support of the probable cause showing for the warrant. That information undermined the probable cause. As to the good faith exception, this is what the exclusionary rule is … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Ptf shows Franks violation for leaving out important mitigating information; officer also had apparent motive

DC: Petr’s debit card records are basic third-party records under Miller and aren’t protected under Carpenter

Debit card financial records are basic third party records, like the bank records in Miller, and Carpenter offers no protection to the petitioner despite his claim of privacy interest in the information. And, if it did, the good faith exception … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Plain view, feel, smell, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on DC: Petr’s debit card records are basic third-party records under Miller and aren’t protected under Carpenter

CA6: Officer continuing a prosecution on false evidence states a § 1983 claim

“A reasonable jury could find that Deputy Edmonds’s post-arrest incident reports contained knowing or reckless falsehoods. Drawing all inferences in favor of Ernest, Deputy Edmonds knew that Ernest never pointed his gun at her and that Ernest did not know … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, DNA, Excessive force, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA6: Officer continuing a prosecution on false evidence states a § 1983 claim

CA11: District Court’s § 1983 SJ credibility determinations on PC require reversal

“Because the District Court weighed testimony and made credibility determinations, it erroneously found that Officer Williams had arguable probable cause to detain Ms. Khoury. We must therefore vacate the District Court’s summary judgment order holding that Officer Williams had qualified … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: District Court’s § 1983 SJ credibility determinations on PC require reversal

Cal.2: Nest and surveillance camera on one’s own property to record ptfs’ loud parties didn’t violate their REP

Defendant’s cameras on their own property, including a Nest camera, that was intended to record plaintiffs’ loud parties did not invade their reasonable expectation of privacy, even if the Nest camera enhanced sound. Mezger v. Bick, 2021 Cal. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Cal.2: Nest and surveillance camera on one’s own property to record ptfs’ loud parties didn’t violate their REP

CA8: Officers had PC to arrest despite later investigation casting doubt and the criminal case getting dismissed

Officers had probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest for a sexual assault charge based on the totality of information, even though charges were later dismissed. Further later investigation cast doubt, but the officers weren’t reckless. Walz v. Randall, 2021 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Officers had PC to arrest despite later investigation casting doubt and the criminal case getting dismissed

CA7: When false arrest is the claim, ptf’s bond conditions are not separate seizures for SoL purposes

Plaintiff’s false evidence claim arises from the arrest or release from detention, and here it is time barred. His release on detention was not a separate Fourth Amendment seizure. Smith v. City of Chi., 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 19136 (7th … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure | Comments Off on CA7: When false arrest is the claim, ptf’s bond conditions are not separate seizures for SoL purposes

CA9: Denial of motion to suppress in state court precludes § 1983 case over same search

Defendant lost his motion to suppress in state court over a warrantless entry into his garage. He later sued over the search under § 1983 in federal court. The federal case was precluded by the state denial of the motion … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Denial of motion to suppress in state court precludes § 1983 case over same search

N.D.Ohio: Def’s suppression motion loss precludes his § 1983 case on same issue

Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint that OnStar allegedly illegally tracked his vehicle was already decided against him in his criminal case. The issue is precluded here. Lenhart v. Savetski, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109462 (N.D. Ohio June 11, 2021). The collection … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Def’s suppression motion loss precludes his § 1983 case on same issue

CA9: Franks violation states § 1983 claim

The DA declined to prosecutor the plaintiff because of a Franks violation in the affidavit for the search warrant. Plaintiff sued, and qualified immunity is found not inapplicable. Dahlin v. Frieborn, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16077 (9th Cir. May 28, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: Franks violation states § 1983 claim

CA3: No suppression hearing needed on the mere chance something will turn up

The request for an evidentiary hearing on a suppression motion based on the mere hope something might turn up is really just speculation and should be denied. United States v. Dfouni, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 15091 (3d Cir. May 19, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Strip search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA3: No suppression hearing needed on the mere chance something will turn up

CA6: Excessive force “assault” claim under § 1983 doesn’t necessarily require contact

Jail conditions can be so bad that they amount to a § 1983 “assault” without there being a more traditional assault. Here, it was a suicidal inmate knowingly put into solitary confinement and that could be pled as excessive force … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA6: Excessive force “assault” claim under § 1983 doesn’t necessarily require contact

DE: Def had no standing to complain where govt actor entered neighbor’s property to look at his

Plaintiff had no standing to challenge a government actor’s entry into his neighbor’s property to look at his. McCafferty v. New Castle County Bd. of License, 2021 Del. Super. LEXIS 343 (Apr. 26, 2021). No matter how the court views … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on DE: Def had no standing to complain where govt actor entered neighbor’s property to look at his

C.D.Cal.: Delayed first appearance 4A claim should be brought by habeas not § 1983

Plaintiff’s claim he did not receive his first appearance within 48 hours should have been brought by habeas under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 not a § 1983 action. Young v. Levert, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76021 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 20, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Delayed first appearance 4A claim should be brought by habeas not § 1983

S.D.Ohio: Pole cam observation of def with blunt was RS for stop

Zooming in on a pole cam video, officers determined that defendant had a blunt in his hand when he was getting in his car. The question is reasonable suspicion, and officers don’t have to exhaust the innocent possibilities before acting … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Pole cameras, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Pole cam observation of def with blunt was RS for stop

CA5: A jury will have to decide reasonableness of excessive force used against a suicidal man

A jury needs to decide whether this officer’s use of deadly force on a suicidal suspect was reasonable. it was “clearly established — and possibly even obvious — that an officer violates the Fourth Amendment if he shoots an unarmed, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: A jury will have to decide reasonableness of excessive force used against a suicidal man

SCOTUS: Shooting at and hitting a person fleeing is a 4A seizure: “The required corporal seizing or touching the defendant’s body … can be as readily accomplished by a bullet as by the end of a finger.”

Shooting at and hitting plaintiff with the intent to stop her flight is an attempted seizure under the Fourth Amendment. She made it 75 miles to a hospital, was airlifted back, and was arrested. (Qualified immunity is not decided here.) … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Shooting at and hitting a person fleeing is a 4A seizure: “The required corporal seizing or touching the defendant’s body … can be as readily accomplished by a bullet as by the end of a finger.”

GA: 4A claim had to be raised at agency hearing level to preserve for appeal

Failure to object on Fourth Amendment grounds at the agency level before the zoning board in a zoning administrative case was waiver for appeal. Forsyth County v. Mommies Props. LLC, 2021 Ga. App. LEXIS 145 (Mar. 11, 2021). “The first … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on GA: 4A claim had to be raised at agency hearing level to preserve for appeal

CA5 declines to extend Bivens to 4A claims outside the home

Court declines to extend Bivens to a search in parking lot because it thinks SCOTUS would agree. Bivens was a search of the home. Byrd v. Lamb, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 6844 (5th Cir. Mar. 9, 2021). “Henriquez-Perez has not … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on CA5 declines to extend Bivens to 4A claims outside the home

CA9: Violent take down of traffic detainee not resisting could be found excessive; no QI

Qualified immunity is denied officers for excessive force in a violent take down on a passively resisting plaintiff in a traffic stop without there being any exigency justifying it. “Viewing the facts, as we must, in the light most favorable … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Violent take down of traffic detainee not resisting could be found excessive; no QI