Category Archives: Informant hearsay

CA2: CI’s reliability supported because he also testified under oath before warrant issued

“[The CI’s] reliability is further supported by the fact that he ‘testified under threat of the criminal sanction for perjury,’ and that his eye-witness report of the crime was incredibly detailed.” United States v. Martin, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 2738 … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA2: CI’s reliability supported because he also testified under oath before warrant issued

M.D.La.: Merely being a CI doesn’t make the CI a “participant” in the crime for disclosure

Merely being a CI for the police doesn’t make the CI a participant in the crime to make his or her identity subject to disclosure. United States v. Westbrook, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10563 (M.D. La. Jan. 22, 2020). The … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Merely being a CI doesn’t make the CI a “participant” in the crime for disclosure

ID: Def left his own door open before the dog sniff; and sniff wasn’t otherwise unreasonable

Defendant got out of his car and left the door open, so it was already open when the dog sniff occurred. Opening the door was not a command. “We decline, however, to rule that an officer’s knock on a driver’s … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on ID: Def left his own door open before the dog sniff; and sniff wasn’t otherwise unreasonable

OH6: 3 controlled buys by 2 CIs was PC; no requirement of showing how they were arranged to happen

Three controlled buys by two CIs was probable cause. There was no showing required of how the drug deals were to be arranged. State v. Reed, 2020-Ohio-138, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 107 (6th Dist. Jan. 17, 2020).* There was probable … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH6: 3 controlled buys by 2 CIs was PC; no requirement of showing how they were arranged to happen

D.S.D.: Cross corroboration of three CIs’ stories was PC

The cross corroboration of three CIs’ stories was probable cause. United States v. Wilford, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6074 (D.S.D. Jan. 14, 2020). “The officers had probable cause to arrest Mancilla-Ibarra because Fann’s information was veritable, reliable, and corroborated.” The … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Cross corroboration of three CIs’ stories was PC

W.D.Ky.: Asking questions while writing out a warning ticket do not measurably extend a stop

Asking questions while writing out a warning ticket do not measurably extend a stop. United States v. Green, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4421 (W.D. Ky. Jan. 10, 2020). Defendant’s arrest was valid, so his statement wasn’t fruit of the poisonous … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Asking questions while writing out a warning ticket do not measurably extend a stop

E.D.Pa.: Leaked existence of federal SW that had press there before the SW results in statutory damages award

Plaintiff sued the government because the IRS and FBI leaked to the media a search warrant for his premises and the media was there. He got $1000 in statutory damages. He filed an untimely motion to reopen based on alleged … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Leaked existence of federal SW that had press there before the SW results in statutory damages award

OH5: Knock-and-talk led to smell of MJ grow; entry for protective sweep before getting SW wasn’t unreasonable

Police came to do a knock-and-talk, and they could smell a marijuana grow from outside. They decided to do a protective sweep for people before they left to get a search warrant because they heard music from inside the home. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Informant hearsay, Knock and talk, Protective sweep | Comments Off on OH5: Knock-and-talk led to smell of MJ grow; entry for protective sweep before getting SW wasn’t unreasonable

CA2: Def showed no reason to be able to obtain identify of CI who led to SW

Defendant’s motion to disclose the CI in the affidavit for search warrant was properly denied because the CI provided nothing to the case on guilt or innocence. United States v. Swinton, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 38141 (2d Cir. Dec. 23, … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA2: Def showed no reason to be able to obtain identify of CI who led to SW

OH10: 911 call from ID’d person two men waving guns in a library is RS

911 call from an identified person that two men were waving guns in a library was reasonable suspicion. State v. Davidson, 2019-Ohio-5320, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 5399 (10th Dist. Dec. 24, 2019).* Defendant fails in his ineffectiveness claim. “Even assuming … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH10: 911 call from ID’d person two men waving guns in a library is RS

D.Mont.: Informant hearsay here was adequately corroborated to be found reliable

The informant hearsay here was sufficiently corroborated. “The affidavit provides sufficient grounds to assess the veracity and basis of knowledge of CS1’s information. Most of CS1’s information is based on personal observations of Goodman. Those observations, including Goodman’s involvement with … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Informant hearsay here was adequately corroborated to be found reliable

CA9: There was PC for the warrant for the premises, and officers were not unreasonable in continuing the search for an hour when they learned their target didn’t live there

Officers got a search warrant for a mobile home, and found out when they executed it that their target didn’t live there. The search warrant was based on informant hearsay that was reliable enough for the search warrant to issue. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: There was PC for the warrant for the premises, and officers were not unreasonable in continuing the search for an hour when they learned their target didn’t live there

D.Mont.: Using Western Union for money transfer creates no REP in WU’s records

Western Union’s production of money transfer records was a classic third-party record situation where there was no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Escobedo, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208067 (D. Mont. Dec. 2, 2019). Defendant’s inconsistent story about whether … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Using Western Union for money transfer creates no REP in WU’s records

PA: Refusing to submit to BAC blood draw under SW supports obstruction of justice conviction

Refusal to submit to a blood draw search warrant for BAC supports a conviction for obstruction of justice. Commonwealth v. Palchanes, 2019 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1186 (Nov. 27, 2019). The CI’s basis of knowledge and reliability was adequately shown, and … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine, Warrant execution | Comments Off on PA: Refusing to submit to BAC blood draw under SW supports obstruction of justice conviction

W.D.Pa.: To make an effective attack on a SW affidavit, explain yourself and don’t leave it to the court to try to do it for you

Yes, there were inconsistencies in the informant hearsay, but the defendant doesn’t help the court in what that means. “Thus, Defendant’s hearsay attacks fail to draw the court’s attention to any problem in the magistrate judges’ analysis.” There was double … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: To make an effective attack on a SW affidavit, explain yourself and don’t leave it to the court to try to do it for you

CA6: Informant’s reliability is the question, and that leads to finding of reliability of his or her hearsay

The CI’s first hand information isn’t constitutionally required for informant hearsay to be deemed credible. The question is the reliability of the informant, not so much the information which usually can’t all be pinned down anyway. United States v. Crawford, … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA6: Informant’s reliability is the question, and that leads to finding of reliability of his or her hearsay

TN: Failure to include the search warrant and affidavit in the record on appeal waives the search issue

Failure to include the search warrant and affidavit in the record on appeal waives the search issue. State v. Parks, 2019 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 740 (Nov. 13, 2019). The officer gets qualified immunity because there was probable cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on TN: Failure to include the search warrant and affidavit in the record on appeal waives the search issue

WI: Uncorroborated informant hearsay was strong enough to credit for probation search on RS

Wisconsin permits warrantless probation and parole searches on reasonable suspicion by any law enforcement officer. Officers had it here based on uncorroborated informant hearsay. The record also supports the trial court’s conclusion that the officer knew of the search condition … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WI: Uncorroborated informant hearsay was strong enough to credit for probation search on RS

IA: One-way cross country rental and multiple cell phones wasn’t RS for extending stop

The officer had no reasonable suspicion developed from defendant’s traffic stop. The rental car was a one-way rental in the name of another and defendant had multiple cell phones. The stop, for all intents and purposes, appears strung out to … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: One-way cross country rental and multiple cell phones wasn’t RS for extending stop

TN: Defense counsel’s failure to object to officer’s testimony of def’s confession during suppression hearing violated Simmons but was harmless

Defendant on post-conviction showed that defense counsel’s performance was deficient for not objecting under Simmons to a state investigator’s testimony that he confessed to the crime in his suppression hearing testimony. Defendant, however, can’t show prejudice because of the other … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Defense counsel’s failure to object to officer’s testimony of def’s confession during suppression hearing violated Simmons but was harmless