Category Archives: Qualified immunity

CA11: Unarmed, compliant, and nonresisting arrestee shot in the back while lying on the ground was excessive force and violates clearly established law

Unarmed, compliant, and nonresisting arrestee shot in the back while lying on the ground was excessive force and violates clearly established law. Denial of qualified immunity denied. The officer’s subjective belief that force was necessary doesn’t carry any weight when … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Unarmed, compliant, and nonresisting arrestee shot in the back while lying on the ground was excessive force and violates clearly established law

CA7: Not a Fourth Amendment violation to physically arrest for a fine only traffic infraction

It is not a Fourth Amendment violation to physically arrest for a fine only traffic infraction. Williams v. Brooks, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 68 (7th Cir. Jan. 5, 2016):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Not a Fourth Amendment violation to physically arrest for a fine only traffic infraction

CA8: Tasering suspected armed and dangerous arrestee was subject to qualified immunity, even when it turned out officers were reasonably mistaken as to ID of suspect

U.S. Marshals reasonably believed the plaintiff was a wanted armed and dangerous felon. He backed away and refused to submit to arrest and was Tasered. “We have since confirmed that ‘non-violent, non-fleeing subjects have a clearly established right to be … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Tasering suspected armed and dangerous arrestee was subject to qualified immunity, even when it turned out officers were reasonably mistaken as to ID of suspect

W.D.La.: Passenger had standing to challenge the stop and the length of detention, but not the search

Defendant passenger had standing to challenge the stop and the length of detention, but not the search. Here, the stop was continued on reasonable suspicion. United States v. Garcia, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166581 (W.D.La. Sept. 23, 2015). [Note: But … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Passenger had standing to challenge the stop and the length of detention, but not the search

CA5: Shooting a dog is a seizure; if reasonable, QI applies

Killing a dog is a Fourth Amendment seizure. Here, the owner testified that the dog was not aggressive, although it did come at the officer. The officer had a split second to respond and shot the dog when it was … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Shooting a dog is a seizure; if reasonable, QI applies

CA7: Arguable PC means QI in a § 1983, even though the ptf is proved innocent

The defendants had arguable probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest, even though it proved that plaintiff was innocent. Therefore, they had qualified immunity. Judge Posner, however, dissents finding no probable cause at all. Burritt v. Ditlefsen, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 20760 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Arguable PC means QI in a § 1983, even though the ptf is proved innocent

CA1: No QI for entry into wrong home chasing burglar; officer should have known this was unjustified

Officers pursuing a burglar down streets and into backyards was directed to a house by an unidentified person, and they entered it with a dog after allegedly announcing. No burglar, but the homeowner who was not pleased, and he got … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Community caretaking function, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA1: No QI for entry into wrong home chasing burglar; officer should have known this was unjustified

E.D.Ky.: Not IAC to not question search at sentencing

Failure to call witnesses at defendant’s child pornography sentencing relating to the legality of the search and seizure in the beginning of the case was not ineffective assistance. They couldn’t add anything at sentencing. Cottle v. United States, 2015 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Not IAC to not question search at sentencing

CA10: Arrest of an entire police tactical unit for thefts during searches was protected by qualified immunity for the half found innocent

A group of officers alleged to have been stealing during search warrant execution was all arrested, but the arrest was over inclusive, nabbing some innocents. “These consolidated cases arise from a sting operation designed to determine if police officers in … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Arrest of an entire police tactical unit for thefts during searches was protected by qualified immunity for the half found innocent

SCOTUS: Not clearly established deadly force could not be used on suspect fleeing at high speed who threatened to shoot officers; Sotomayor: “By sanctioning a ‘shoot first, think later’ approach to policing, the Court renders the protections of the Fourth Amendment hollow.”

It was not clearly established at the time (2010) that deadly force could not be used on a suspect fleeing in a car at 85-100 mph who threatened to shoot police officers. Thus, the separate Fourth Amendment question doesn’t matter … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Not clearly established deadly force could not be used on suspect fleeing at high speed who threatened to shoot officers; Sotomayor: “By sanctioning a ‘shoot first, think later’ approach to policing, the Court renders the protections of the Fourth Amendment hollow.”

CA6: Officers’ civil assist ended up in stating a claim in the retaking of a car

Officers were on a civil assist in aiding repossession of a car that was involved in a family dispute going back and forth for a couple of years. “Viewing the record in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, we agree … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Officers’ civil assist ended up in stating a claim in the retaking of a car

CA10: Even if SW was overbroad, it was approved by DA before issuing magistrate got it, and they could reasonably rely on it

Even if a search warrant was overbroad in describing items to be seized with the requisite particularity, police officers were improperly denied qualified immunity since the warrant was approved by a district attorney and issued by a detached and neutral … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Overbreadth, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Even if SW was overbroad, it was approved by DA before issuing magistrate got it, and they could reasonably rely on it

CA5: Suppression of evidence in state court does not per se raise a basis for a claim in federal court on whether the officers violated clearly established rights

Suppression of evidence in state court does not per se raise a basis for a claim in federal court on whether the officers violated clearly established rights, particularly when the suppression hearing transcript wasn’t provided to the federal court. Cleveland … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Suppression of evidence in state court does not per se raise a basis for a claim in federal court on whether the officers violated clearly established rights

Two on qualified immunity

Officers arrived at the scene of a shooting and immediately called for EMS, and called twice more before they finally arrived. Plaintiffs’ quarrel was that they weren’t more emphatic about the degree of injury. “A reasonable officer in Piotrowski’s or … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Two on qualified immunity

E.D.Tex.: Gunshots inside a house, screaming, and blood outside was exigent circumstances

Gunshots inside a house, screaming, and blood outside was exigent circumstances. [Yet it was argued it wasn’t. Hey, sometimes we have to.] United States v. Vanhorn, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127261 (E.D.Tex. September 21, 2015). A doctor was denied qualified … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Gunshots inside a house, screaming, and blood outside was exigent circumstances

CA5: School’s coercively obtaining social media password was protected by QI because it wasn’t firmly established at the time

A teacher and school officials coercively obtained plaintiff’s social media password because of alleged threatening messages. As First and Fourth Amendment rights, this right was not firmly established at the time, and defendants thus had no firm notice that their … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: School’s coercively obtaining social media password was protected by QI because it wasn’t firmly established at the time

CA11: Reaching into a house to effect a Terry stop without exigent circumstances violates the Fourth Amendment; but qualified immunity here

Reaching into a house to effect a Terry stop without exigent circumstances violates the Fourth Amendment. “Dorothy may have said it best when she said, ‘There is no place like home.’ Though we are pretty sure that she was not … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA11: Reaching into a house to effect a Terry stop without exigent circumstances violates the Fourth Amendment; but qualified immunity here

CA8: Qualified immunity because it was not clearly established in 2009 use of a Taser was unreasonable

It was not clearly established in 2009 that use of a Taser was unreasonable so the officers get qualified immunity. Here, it happened in jail when plaintiff refused to change into a jail uniform. Hollingsworth v. City of St. Ann, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Qualified immunity because it was not clearly established in 2009 use of a Taser was unreasonable

CA5: Ptfs’ failure to show lack of PC doomed § 1983 case

There was no effort on the part of plaintiffs to show that their arrest was without probable cause. They submitted city recall petitions, but some of the names were friends and relatives of the persons being recalled. The recallees hired … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Ptfs’ failure to show lack of PC doomed § 1983 case

OR: It’s the state’s burden to argue any exceptions to the warrant requirement

It’s the state’s burden to argue any exceptions to the warrant requirement. State v. Maciel-Figueroa, 273 Ore. App. 298, 356 P.3d 674 (2015) (under submission 2½ years), aff’d, State v. Maciel-Figueroa, 361 Ore. 163, 2017 Ore. LEXIS 166 (March 2, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on OR: It’s the state’s burden to argue any exceptions to the warrant requirement