Category Archives: Qualified immunity

CA6: Def let a man into his house to talk to his wife; he was a plainclothes officer who didn’t ID himself and saw def handle a firearm, and def was a felon; no deception for entry

“While at home on a cold November morning, William Wooden heard a knock at the door. Upon opening it, Wooden was greeted by a man asking to speak with Wooden’s wife. Wooden went to get her. And he allowed the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Def let a man into his house to talk to his wife; he was a plainclothes officer who didn’t ID himself and saw def handle a firearm, and def was a felon; no deception for entry

CA5: Even assuming 4A violation, ptf doesn’t show it was clearly established

“In short, we decline to opine on whether Campbell’s actions amount to a [Fourth Amendment] violation. Robles failed to meet his burden to show that such a violation was clearly established, particularly when dealing with an underlying violent crime. Accordingly, … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA5: Even assuming 4A violation, ptf doesn’t show it was clearly established

E.D.Mo.: FIPF arrest justifies search incident

Defendant’s arrest for being a felon in possession justified his search incident. United States v. Westfall, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217329 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 18, 2019).* Defendant’s detention was without reasonable suspicion and unreasonably extended. A probation officer was working … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: FIPF arrest justifies search incident

W.D.Pa.: Four prior controlled buys and def’s arrival at location for another was PC

Officers had four controlled buys and defendants were arriving at a predetermined location for another one. That was probable cause. United States v. Boxley, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 214715 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2019).* Consent to search the premises was … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Four prior controlled buys and def’s arrival at location for another was PC

CA11: The lack of even arguable PC for ptf’s arrest denies the officer QI

This is a Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution claim. “The district court, upon a close analysis of the elements of the crimes alleged, determined that the facts proffered by Detective Brashears are insufficient to establish probable cause, or even arguable probable … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: The lack of even arguable PC for ptf’s arrest denies the officer QI

Two on excessive force and QI

“We conclude that Detective Minium is entitled to qualified immunity. It was not clearly established in August 2014 that an officer uses excessive force when he tackles and uses a taser in “drive stun” mode on an individual he is … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Two on excessive force and QI

CA4: Search of def’s backpack and finding gun was inevitable because it would have been inventoried in any event

“The evidence presented to the district court supported a finding that the firearm inevitably would have been discovered during an inventory search of the plastic bag. Officers Lucy and DiPentima testified that it was standard procedure to inventory an arrestee’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Search of def’s backpack and finding gun was inevitable because it would have been inventoried in any event

WA: Arrestee’s right to advice of right to counsel doesn’t require stopping execution of SW to tell him

While an arrestee is entitled to a prompt notice of his right to counsel, police do not have to interrupt execution of a search warrant to do it. State v. Ackerman, 2019 Wash. App. LEXIS 3023 (Dec. 2, 2019). Officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WA: Arrestee’s right to advice of right to counsel doesn’t require stopping execution of SW to tell him

CA5: Use of deadly force against an armed, dangerous, and unpredicable man was subject to QI

Officers were entitled to qualified immunity because plaintiff could not establish that they used excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The evidence indicated that the use of force was justified under the circumstances. Because the officers thought they … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA5: Use of deadly force against an armed, dangerous, and unpredicable man was subject to QI

W.D.Pa.: Even if the one challenged sentence in the SW affidavit was stricken under Franks, PC would still exist

Defendant challenged one sentence in the affidavit as a Franks violation, but it doesn’t even appear to be false. Moreover, even if that sentence were stricken, there still would be probable cause, and he fails in his burden of proof. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Even if the one challenged sentence in the SW affidavit was stricken under Franks, PC would still exist

CA11: Officer’s alleged lies to get arrest warrant denies QI

“With that in mind, we affirm the district court’s denial of qualified immunity. As indicated above, we accept for purposes of this appeal that Gill falsified information in the affidavits supporting his arrest warrants and therefore, he would not have … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Officer’s alleged lies to get arrest warrant denies QI

NY4: Summary judgment on false arrest and excessive force claim without considering officers’ testimony in underlying criminal trial was error

Summary judgment against the defendants for false arrest and excessive force was improperly granted without considering the transcript of plaintiff’s criminal trial and the officers’ testimony there. Hernandez v Denny’s Corp., 2019 NY Slip Op 08302, 2019 N.Y. App. Div. … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: Summary judgment on false arrest and excessive force claim without considering officers’ testimony in underlying criminal trial was error

E.D.Tenn.: Facebook photo of def felon with a firearm apparently taken in a home justified a SW for his home

Defendant’s alleged threat on Facebook involving use of firearms, along with a picture of a firearm suggested it was in a home. The search warrant of defendant’s home was with probable cause. Defendant’s effort to “dissect” the affidavit paragraph by … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Facebook photo of def felon with a firearm apparently taken in a home justified a SW for his home

TN: Failure to include the search warrant and affidavit in the record on appeal waives the search issue

Failure to include the search warrant and affidavit in the record on appeal waives the search issue. State v. Parks, 2019 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 740 (Nov. 13, 2019). The officer gets qualified immunity because there was probable cause for … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on TN: Failure to include the search warrant and affidavit in the record on appeal waives the search issue

WV: Exclusionary rule does not apply in civil cases

DHHR obtained information about the parents from an alleged illegal stop. The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases. In re N.R., 2019 W. Va. LEXIS 524 (Nov. 7, 2019). A game warden approached plaintiff sitting in his truck in … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on WV: Exclusionary rule does not apply in civil cases

CA4: Ptf shot and paralyzed during no-knock raid states a claim and survives QI

During a no-knock entry with a battering ram by plain-clothes officers for marijuana, plaintiff heard a commotion from the back of his house, reached for a gun, and was shot at 29 times, hit 9 times, and paralyzed. The officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Knock and announce, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Ptf shot and paralyzed during no-knock raid states a claim and survives QI

KY declines to reject Hodari D. under state constitution

Kentucky’s state constitution’s search provision is based on Pennsylvania’s. Pennsylvania has rejected Hodari D. under state law. Kentucky declines to do so, too. Hunter v. Commonwealth, 2019 Ky. LEXIS 434 (Oct. 31, 2019). Post-conviction petitioner’s cell phone search issue had … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, State constitution | Comments Off on KY declines to reject Hodari D. under state constitution

CA11: Factual dispute as to where misd arrest occurred, in the house or out, denies QI; it appears force used was excessive

Arguable probable cause supported plaintiff’s misdemeanor arrest, but there is a factual dispute denying qualified immunity to the officers of where exactly the arrest started and how it ended up indoors. That remains for trial. The complaint also survives on … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Factual dispute as to where misd arrest occurred, in the house or out, denies QI; it appears force used was excessive

CA2: Not clearly established for QI that a warrantless body cavity search required exigency and a particularized suspicion

A police officer was entitled to qualified immunity because the right to be free from a warrantless manual body cavity search in the absence of exigent circumstances and a particularized suspicion that evidence of a crime was secreted inside the … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Not clearly established for QI that a warrantless body cavity search required exigency and a particularized suspicion

CA7: Police officers who obtained def’s blood work from a hospital under an Indiana statute didn’t violate the 4A

Plaintiff sued under § 1983 because police got his blood work from the hospital albeit under Indiana statute. “We turn next to Stewart’s Fourth Amendment claim. The district court entered summary judgment for the defendant police officers on the basis … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Police officers who obtained def’s blood work from a hospital under an Indiana statute didn’t violate the 4A