Category Archives: Qualified immunity

KY declines to reject Hodari D. under state constitution

Kentucky’s state constitution’s search provision is based on Pennsylvania’s. Pennsylvania has rejected Hodari D. under state law. Kentucky declines to do so, too. Hunter v. Commonwealth, 2019 Ky. LEXIS 434 (Oct. 31, 2019). Post-conviction petitioner’s cell phone search issue had … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, State constitution | Comments Off on KY declines to reject Hodari D. under state constitution

CA11: Factual dispute as to where misd arrest occurred, in the house or out, denies QI; it appears force used was excessive

Arguable probable cause supported plaintiff’s misdemeanor arrest, but there is a factual dispute denying qualified immunity to the officers of where exactly the arrest started and how it ended up indoors. That remains for trial. The complaint also survives on … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Factual dispute as to where misd arrest occurred, in the house or out, denies QI; it appears force used was excessive

CA2: Not clearly established for QI that a warrantless body cavity search required exigency and a particularized suspicion

A police officer was entitled to qualified immunity because the right to be free from a warrantless manual body cavity search in the absence of exigent circumstances and a particularized suspicion that evidence of a crime was secreted inside the … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Not clearly established for QI that a warrantless body cavity search required exigency and a particularized suspicion

CA7: Police officers who obtained def’s blood work from a hospital under an Indiana statute didn’t violate the 4A

Plaintiff sued under § 1983 because police got his blood work from the hospital albeit under Indiana statute. “We turn next to Stewart’s Fourth Amendment claim. The district court entered summary judgment for the defendant police officers on the basis … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Police officers who obtained def’s blood work from a hospital under an Indiana statute didn’t violate the 4A

CA11: PC or not, the warrantless entry to arrest ptf violated the 4A

The parties got into an argument, and plaintiff went back into his house. The defendant came in after him. “Without deciding whether Bailey’s arrest was supported by probable cause—or, as it goes in the qualified-immunity context, ‘arguable probable cause’—we reverse. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: PC or not, the warrantless entry to arrest ptf violated the 4A

D.Idaho: US Probation may enlist LEOs in conducting supervision search of cell phone

U.S. Probation was supervising defendant and they suspected child pornography on his cell phone. They enlisted HSI to search the phone. This did not violate federal law; USPO can get assistance to conduct a search. United States v. Johnson, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Idaho: US Probation may enlist LEOs in conducting supervision search of cell phone

CA3: A threat to violate the 4A is not a 4A violation; it is contingent for Art. III

“The Probation Department employees’ alleged threat to send Repotski back to jail does not state a constitutional violation cognizable under § 1983. See McFadden v. Lucas, 713 F.2d 143, 146 (5th Cir. 1983) (noting that mere threats do not amount … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Search, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: A threat to violate the 4A is not a 4A violation; it is contingent for Art. III

CA10: Remanded again on QI because the court admittedly wasn’t perfectly clear

Appellate courts can’t always speak with one voice or opinion. The panel in this case previously issued three opinions. Harte v. Bd. of Comm’rs of the Cty. of Johnson, 864 F.3d 1154 (10th Cir. 2017). On remand, then, everybody had … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Remanded again on QI because the court admittedly wasn’t perfectly clear

CA6: Police get QI for coming to take ptf in for a mental exam but electing instead to arrest

Police were called to plaintiff’s house because he was barricaded in a closet with a gun threatening to kill himself. When police arrived, he was ultimately taken in for alleged crimes, for which he was later acquitted. The officers get … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Police get QI for coming to take ptf in for a mental exam but electing instead to arrest

CA11: Ptf arrested on incorrect computer entry had 4A rights violated, but defs get QI

Plaintiff paid his fine for a speeding ticket and that was to avoid probation. The probation officer was in court and heard all that. Some clerk, however, entered into the computer system that he was on probation. Plaintiff was later … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Ptf arrested on incorrect computer entry had 4A rights violated, but defs get QI

The Atlantic: Federal Officials Should Be Accountable for Their Wrongdoing

The Atlantic: Federal Officials Should Be Accountable for Their Wrongdoing by Leah Litman (“And judges need to be the ones to make them pay.”)

Posted in Police misconduct, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on The Atlantic: Federal Officials Should Be Accountable for Their Wrongdoing

Reason: A License for Outrageous Police Conduct

Reason: A License for Outrageous Police Conduct by Jacob Sullum (“Qualified immunity protects cops from liability for actions that would land ordinary people in jail.”)

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Reason: A License for Outrageous Police Conduct

CA9: QI: without a case almost on point, you lose

A typical Fourth Amendment qualified immunity outcome on appeal: You need a case that’s obvious or a case substantially on point. Without it, you lose. Sightler v. Nisleit, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 28702 (9th Cir. Sept. 23, 2019)*:

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: QI: without a case almost on point, you lose

W.D.Ark.: Whether windshield was cracked enough to be a violation of traffic laws doesn’t matter, it was still cracked which was enough for a stop

Defendant was stopped because of a crack in the windshield. He argued it wasn’t sufficiently cracked to be a violation of law. The point is, however, that the stop was at least justified by the crack. “To summarize, Officer Johnson … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Whether windshield was cracked enough to be a violation of traffic laws doesn’t matter, it was still cracked which was enough for a stop

CA9: IRS agent’s need to watch ptf pee during SW was unreasonable; they didn’t do that to her husband when he did

Plaintiff’s claim that an IRS CID investigator had to watch her go to the bathroom just in case she was hiding evidence survived a qualified immunity challenge. The right to bodily privacy was established at the time, and the officer’s … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: IRS agent’s need to watch ptf pee during SW was unreasonable; they didn’t do that to her husband when he did

CA6: Seizing ptf out of her home for a psych eval without PC stated claim and overcame QI

Plaintiff stated a claim that she was unreasonably seized in her home without probable cause or a warrant for a psych evaluation. Qualified immunity denied. Rudolph v. Atkinson, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 28477 (6th Cir. Sept. 20, 2019)*:

Posted in Community caretaking function, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Seizing ptf out of her home for a psych eval without PC stated claim and overcame QI

CA2: US citizen jailed without PC as an undocumented immigrant states a FTCA claim

A federal tort claims act case was properly stated for an American citizen plaintiff’s four day detention in an immigration facility as lacking probable cause. Hernandez v. United States, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 28081 (2d Cir. Sept. 17, 2019). Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Immigration arrests, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: US citizen jailed without PC as an undocumented immigrant states a FTCA claim

CA11: Criminal trial record not fully binding on ptf who was on trial there because incentives to litigate were different

The defendants observed plaintiff’s actions and they saw probable cause to believe he committed trespass. Therefore, the false arrest claim fails. His excessive force claim, however, survives summary judgment. Using the criminal trial testimony wasn’t particularly helpful or controlling because … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Criminal trial record not fully binding on ptf who was on trial there because incentives to litigate were different

CA8: Patel didn’t bar police requesting look at hotel registry in looking for bank robbers; third-party doctrine applies

City of Los Angeles v. Patel didn’t make the police look at a hotel registry a search. Defendants were suspected of bank fraud and aggravated identity theft in printing bogus checks and cashing them. Police went to a motel where … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA8: Patel didn’t bar police requesting look at hotel registry in looking for bank robbers; third-party doctrine applies

IL: Disorderly conduct can justify a Terry stop

Police received a 911 call about a man with a blue hoodie on a bicycle shouting profanities. Because the call was to 911 and recorded and logged with caller ID, it was more reliable. On seeing the man, the officer … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IL: Disorderly conduct can justify a Terry stop