Category Archives: Qualified immunity

GA: Even if knock-and-talk was valid, expanding entry onto the curtilage wasn’t

The knock-and-talk here was reasonable in its inception, but the officer violated the curtilage by inspecting a car parked there. The state’s argument that reasonable suspicion permitted approaching the car was not raised below so it’s waived. “Furthermore, even if … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Knock and talk, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Even if knock-and-talk was valid, expanding entry onto the curtilage wasn’t

CA1 denies rehearing en banc on Jardines and denies qualified immunity

French v. Merrill, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 2625 (1st Cir. Jan. 28, 2022) (3-3*) (panel decision 15 F.4th 116 (1st Cir. Oct. 1, 2021)). On why rehearing should not be granted:

Posted in Curtilage, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA1 denies rehearing en banc on Jardines and denies qualified immunity

CA8: Ptfs stated claim to overcome qualified immunity and arguable probable cause during mass arrests of peaceful protesters

Qualified immunity was denied for officers who were alleged to have arrested peaceful protestors in St. Louis in 2017. People were allowed to enter an area and then were arrested. As to force, “The pleadings before us and video evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Ptfs stated claim to overcome qualified immunity and arguable probable cause during mass arrests of peaceful protesters

N.D.W.Va.: QI for PC is a reasonable belief PC exists, not whether it actually exists

“In analyzing whether law enforcement officers have qualified immunity in a false arrest claim pursuant to § 1983, the issue is not whether probable cause actually exists but whether a reasonable officer in the officer’s position would have believed he … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: QI for PC is a reasonable belief PC exists, not whether it actually exists

CA9: It is clearly established that using “intermediate force” against a nonresisting arrestee is unreasonable

It was clearly established that using “intermediate force” against a nonresisting arrestee is unreasonable. “To be clear, we are generally loath to second-guess law enforcement officers’ actions in a dangerous situation by analyzing each act without looking at the entire … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: It is clearly established that using “intermediate force” against a nonresisting arrestee is unreasonable

OH11: 4A doesn’t require alternative arrangements to towing be offered

The Fourth Amendment does not require that a motorist who’s car is about to be towed and would be inventoried can make alternative arrangements to avoid the tow. State v. Patterson, 2021-Ohio-4617, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 4542 (11th Dist. Dec. … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on OH11: 4A doesn’t require alternative arrangements to towing be offered

CA11: Just saying something is clearly established doesn’t make it so for QI

Just saying something is clearly established doesn’t make it so for qualified immunity. “Stallworth has not met her burden. Although Stallworth argues that Hurst violated her ‘clearly established rights,’ she has not presented a case with materially similar facts, demonstrated … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Just saying something is clearly established doesn’t make it so for QI

D.N.M.: In Torres v. Madrid on remand, defs get QI; right not clearly established in 2014

Torres v. Madrid, 141 S. Ct. 989 (2021) on remand: Defendants get qualified immunity because it wasn’t clearly established in 2014 that a shooting was an arrest. Torres v. Madrid, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 248358 (D.N.M. Dec. 30, 2021). [Once … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.N.M.: In Torres v. Madrid on remand, defs get QI; right not clearly established in 2014

CA7: Ptf’s manufactured evidence claim survives QI

Plaintiff was tried and acquitted for murder. He sued under § 1983 after two years in custody alleging evidence for his trial was fabricated and exculpatory evidence was withheld. The district court denied qualified immunity, and the defendants appealed. Defendants … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf’s manufactured evidence claim survives QI

CA8 again grants QI to stopping innocent persons at gunpoint

The Eighth Circuit again holds that stopping innocent persons at gunpoint with almost any reason at all almost always results in qualified immunity for the officer. Irvin v. Richardson, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 37110 (8th Cir. Dec. 16, 2021):

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8 again grants QI to stopping innocent persons at gunpoint

D.D.C.: CI’s single controlled buy off def was PC

A single controlled buy from defendant’s home is probable cause without additional corroboration. Moreover, the CI had worked for MPD for a decade. United States v. Hill, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238824 (D.D.C. Dec. 14, 2021). The fire department responded … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.D.C.: CI’s single controlled buy off def was PC

N.D.Ind.: 2254(d) “unreasonable application” review considered whether correct case law applied

In this 2254, the argument was that the state court’s application of law violated 2254’s “unreasonable” application standard, but it didn’t. The question was whether Michigan v. Long or Arizona v. Gant applies. “In sum, the State courts’ reliance on … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Seizure, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: 2254(d) “unreasonable application” review considered whether correct case law applied

MI: Inventory was reasonable and not pretextual

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging the inventory search of defendant’s car because the inventory was reasonable. After the arrest of the occupants, the vehicle had to be towed, and the inventory was within policy and not a pretext … Continue reading

Posted in Hot pursuit, Inventory, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on MI: Inventory was reasonable and not pretextual

W.D.Tex.: Case on taking key from a child for police to enter house will go to a jury; no exigency, no QI

Using key obtained from a teenage daughter’s bra, in handcuffs a block away, the mom and two other daughters get to present their case to a jury that police used the key to unreasonably enter the house without announcement. E.R. … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Case on taking key from a child for police to enter house will go to a jury; no exigency, no QI

FL1: Alleged statutory violation for seizing alcohol abusers not subject to any exclusionary rule

An officer’s alleged violation of statutory procedures for dealing with alcohol abusers they encounter is not subject to an exclusionary rule. Nothing in the statute even suggests it. Jones v. State, 2021 Fla. App. LEXIS 15097 (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on FL1: Alleged statutory violation for seizing alcohol abusers not subject to any exclusionary rule

M.D.Pa.: Tracking data obtained by SW is not testimonial for Crawford purposes

Tracking data on defendant’s vehicle in a stalking investigation was not testimonial for Crawford purposes, and it comes in as a business record. United States v. Miah, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224557 (M.D.Pa. Nov. 22, 2021). A citizen complaint against … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Tracking data obtained by SW is not testimonial for Crawford purposes

N.D.Ohio: One day delay of package in transit was reasonable

Defendant lacked standing to challenge the search of a parcel of drugs. “Even if Defendant could challenge the delay of delivering the Target Parcel, his argument fails. While ‘theoretically’ the ‘detention of mail could at some point become an unreasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Mail and packages, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: One day delay of package in transit was reasonable

CA6: Shooting a man in the back for lawfully carrying a gun doesn’t get QI [yet D.Ct. bought it]

The district court erred by granting the police officer summary judgment as to plaintiff’s excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment. Accepting plaintiff’s account of the incident, the officer violated plaintiff’s clearly established rights when he shot him six times … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Shooting a man in the back for lawfully carrying a gun doesn’t get QI [yet D.Ct. bought it]

CA11: No QI where ptf showed potential false arrest and lengthy detention where crime lab found no drugs

Plaintiff showed sufficient evidence to have a jury decide that her jaywalking arrest was bogus and that led to finding alleged cocaine. Instead, the supposed cocaine was sand leaking from a stress ball that allegedly tested positive for cocaine in … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: No QI where ptf showed potential false arrest and lengthy detention where crime lab found no drugs

CA4: Choking out and killing a mentally ill man who only vaguely threatened himself was excessive force

“This appeal arises from a tragic incident that led to the death of Joshua Lawhon, an unarmed mentally ill man. Invoking 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Virginia state law, Lawhon’s mother, as administrator of his estate, brought this action against … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Choking out and killing a mentally ill man who only vaguely threatened himself was excessive force