Category Archives: Inventory

NY Kings Co.: “There is no Fourth Amendment principle that forbids a police officer from being pleased at having found an illegal weapon”

“Set against the obvious reality that a well-documented full and proper inventory was carried out here, I do not find the mere fact that after spotting the gun at the outset, Officer Duran exclaimed, ‘that was easy,’ and ‘Now it’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory | Comments Off on NY Kings Co.: “There is no Fourth Amendment principle that forbids a police officer from being pleased at having found an illegal weapon”

N.D.Ill.: Going to drug deal from house and then going back is nexus to the house

Defendant left his house, went to a drug deal, and returned. This is not the officer’s mere reliance on what drug dealers normally do or he would expect to find. United States v. McCreary, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69838 (N.D.Ill. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Inventory, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Going to drug deal from house and then going back is nexus to the house

E.D.Mo.: Empty sandwich bag in car not subject to plain view; incriminating nature not immediately apparent

The government failed to establish reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop on an anonymous tip where nothing of substance was furnished contrary to Navarette. Moreover, it wasn’t immediately apparent an empty sandwich bag in the car was incriminating for plain view. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Empty sandwich bag in car not subject to plain view; incriminating nature not immediately apparent

CA8: Car seizure for overtinting and inventory were reasonable

Defendant’s car was permissibly seized for overtinting, and the subsequent search was reasonable as inventory. United States v. Perez, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 8697 (8th Cir. Apr. 1, 2022).* “Even assuming arguendo that Thrasher could make a substantial preliminary showing … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA8: Car seizure for overtinting and inventory were reasonable

E.D.Wis.: Inevitable discovery cures otherwise unreasonable inventory

“The search here was generally unreasonable, but it was saved by inevitable discovery. “In the present case, the Government does not contend that Hobbs had probable cause to search Defendant’s vehicle. Hobbs did not have a warrant. His search was … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Scope of search | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Inevitable discovery cures otherwise unreasonable inventory

NC: Inventory of a wrecked and apparently abandoned vehicle was reasonable

“In either event, the officers were justified in searching the wrecked vehicle to get it out of the ditch for an inventory or for officer safety. Officers searched the vehicle in an effort to find the purported driver’s name or … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Pretext, Probable cause | Comments Off on NC: Inventory of a wrecked and apparently abandoned vehicle was reasonable

E.D.Wis.: Inventory was unreasonable where SOP didn’t mention inventory for overtinting and cash found wasn’t inventoried but was instead delivered to DEA

Even assuming that a tow and inventory is permissible for an illegal tint violation (comparing Atwater v. Lago Vista on trivial arrests not being unreasonable), the inventory police did not address such incidents and the inventory itself mentioned “backpack” without … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Inventory was unreasonable where SOP didn’t mention inventory for overtinting and cash found wasn’t inventoried but was instead delivered to DEA

D.R.I.: Removing back cover of cell phone to see the serial number not unreasonable during inventory

Defendant was in a car that was stopped for overtinting, and that led to a tow and inventory. The police searched for and obtained the serial numbers of four cell phones found during the inventory. They were not otherwise searched, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Inventory | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Removing back cover of cell phone to see the serial number not unreasonable during inventory

M.D.Pa.: Failure to completely follow inventory policy doesn’t require suppression

The inventory here wasn’t complete because defendant’s cell phone wasn’t in the inventory and apparently left behind. [Now that’s ironic.] A gun and ammunition were. Because they are dangerous instrumentalities, that makes the inventory reasonable. “It is not obvious to … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Inventory | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Failure to completely follow inventory policy doesn’t require suppression

D.Neb.: Inventory reasonable and followed SOP despite officer’s expectation to find evidence of crime

The inventory here was reasonable despite the fact the officer suspected illegal items in the vehicle. A criminal search was not the sole motivating factor, and the inventory followed SOPs. United States v. Nielsen, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 249611 (D.Neb. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Inventory reasonable and followed SOP despite officer’s expectation to find evidence of crime

E.D.Mo.: Third party to forfeiture can’t challenge search

Third parties to a forfeiture seeking to protect their interest have no standing to challenge legality of the seizure that led to the forfeiture. United States v. Koeln, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3934 (E.D.Mo. Jan. 10, 2022). Defendant’s felony arrest … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Forfeiture, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Third party to forfeiture can’t challenge search

MA: A computer check during a traffic stop would dispel any RS, and failure to do so was unreasonable

Defendant’s car had an inspection rejection sticker for safety defects, but state law grants a 60 day grace period for correction. A computer check would have answered any questions. “Accordingly, we conclude that whether the troopers’ suspicion was reasonable in … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: A computer check during a traffic stop would dispel any RS, and failure to do so was unreasonable

TN: Where car was abandoned, there were no reasonable alternatives to impoundment available to the police

Tennessee recognizes that impoundment and inventory can be avoided if there are reasonable alternatives to it at the time. Here, defendant’s car was abandoned on the road and, when they arrived, it was in the process of being towed and … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Where car was abandoned, there were no reasonable alternatives to impoundment available to the police

OH11: 4A doesn’t require alternative arrangements to towing be offered

The Fourth Amendment does not require that a motorist who’s car is about to be towed and would be inventoried can make alternative arrangements to avoid the tow. State v. Patterson, 2021-Ohio-4617, 2021 Ohio App. LEXIS 4542 (11th Dist. Dec. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on OH11: 4A doesn’t require alternative arrangements to towing be offered

NM: Tow and inventory of vehicle parked in owner’s driveway was unreasonable

The tow and inventory of the car defendant was driving, his grandmother’s, without a valid license was an abuse of the officer’s discretion. Here, the vehicle was parked in the grandmother’s driveway when the stop occurred. The officer’s practice of … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Tow and inventory of vehicle parked in owner’s driveway was unreasonable

MI: Inventory was reasonable and not pretextual

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging the inventory search of defendant’s car because the inventory was reasonable. After the arrest of the occupants, the vehicle had to be towed, and the inventory was within policy and not a pretext … Continue reading →

Posted in Hot pursuit, Inventory, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on MI: Inventory was reasonable and not pretextual

ND: Federal tribal DTF officer could stop suspected DUI on state highway

“In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Cooley, we conclude the federal law enforcement officer working as an agent for the tribal drug enforcement agency had jurisdiction to detain Suelzle for a reasonable time while awaiting a state officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ND: Federal tribal DTF officer could stop suspected DUI on state highway

N.D.Ill.: Officer watching video of street radioing officer on the street about seeing a gun was RS

A Chicago PD officer was watching the streets with surveillance cameras, and he observed defendant apparently with a firearm under his shirt. That report to others who conducted the frisk was collective knowledge for a stop [although that phrase isn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Collective knowledge, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Officer watching video of street radioing officer on the street about seeing a gun was RS

AL: Searching coat of OD victim for source was reasonable

Paramedics and an officer arrived at a medical emergency call. While defendant was being prepared for transport, the officer checked defendant’s coat and felt a pill bottle which he looked at in case it had anything to do with his … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Inventory | Comments Off on AL: Searching coat of OD victim for source was reasonable

CA10: Inventory was reasonable, and counsel’s admission at oral argument was binding

“For these reasons, we conclude that the officers had a reasonable, non-pretextual, community-caretaker rationale for impoundment: securing an uninsured vehicle on the side of a public road with inadequate taillights until a licensed driver with a legitimate connection to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Inventory was reasonable, and counsel’s admission at oral argument was binding