Category Archives: Inventory

TN: Mere called-in description and location of allegedly impaired driver wasn’t enough for stop

A mere description of a truck and its general location, with no details of how the caller knew that the driver was impaired, was insufficient. Even when coupled with the officer’s one-minute interaction with defendant prior to seizing her where … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Inventory | Comments Off on TN: Mere called-in description and location of allegedly impaired driver wasn’t enough for stop

NM: Inventory of def’s backpack many feet away from him was unreasonable, even though he admitted MJ was in it [Revd by NMSC]

Defendant on his motorcycle was followed by an officer because the officer knew that he didn’t have a valid driver’s license. He pulled into his driveway and parked behind his car and got off the bike, putting his backpack on … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on NM: Inventory of def’s backpack many feet away from him was unreasonable, even though he admitted MJ was in it [Revd by NMSC]

OH9: Taking def’s purse from car as she’s going to jail and searching it justified by auto exception or inventory

When defendant was arrested, the officer took her purse out of the car so it could go to jail with her. The search of the purse was valid as inventory or under the automobile exception. Also, Ohio recognizes good faith … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing, Inventory | Comments Off on OH9: Taking def’s purse from car as she’s going to jail and searching it justified by auto exception or inventory

N.D.Iowa: Inventory “policy’s language that the inventory must be ‘thorough and uniform’” is not “unconstitutional per se”

An inventory “policy’s language that the inventory must be ‘thorough and uniform’” is not “unconstitutional per se.” United States v. Perez-Trevino, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61447 (N.D.Iowa May 10, 2016)*:

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Inventory “policy’s language that the inventory must be ‘thorough and uniform’” is not “unconstitutional per se”

W.D.Pa.: Leaving car in street after being taken away by ambulance after being shot justified impoundment and inventory of the car

Defendant called the police because he was shot in the chest while in his car. An ambulance arrived and took defendant to the hospital. His car was left in the middle of the street. Impoundment of the car and inventory … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Leaving car in street after being taken away by ambulance after being shot justified impoundment and inventory of the car

MA recognizes lesser intrusive measures to impoundment; inventory here unreasonable

Lesser intrusive measures to impoundment were available and rejected by the police, and that made the inventory unreasonable. Defendant offered to have somebody come and immediately get the car, and he should have been able to. Commonwealth v. Oliveira, 2016 … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on MA recognizes lesser intrusive measures to impoundment; inventory here unreasonable

OK: Officer could approach parked motorist on closed business parking lot after hours for welfare check

Defendant was standing next to his motorcycle on a closed business parking lot, across the street from a casino, in the early morning hours. The officer approached him to inquire. Defendant said he was “taking a break.” The officer asked … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Inventory | Comments Off on OK: Officer could approach parked motorist on closed business parking lot after hours for welfare check

S.D.N.Y.: Arrest for avoiding subway fare led to inevitably finding gun; good explanation of analytical steps

Officers had probable cause to stop defendant for using the service gate at the Bronx 233d St. subway station without paying. He was a frequent flyer, as it were, and that led to a custodial arrest. He had a knife … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Arrest for avoiding subway fare led to inevitably finding gun; good explanation of analytical steps

MA: If arrest invalid, inventory based on it is too

Defendant’s arrest was invalid, so the inventory of his car was invalid. Commonwealth v. Williams, 2016 Mass. Super. LEXIS 19 (Wooster Feb. 18, 2016). The protective sweep here was invalid, but that did not require suppression of the search. Excising … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Protective sweep | Comments Off on MA: If arrest invalid, inventory based on it is too

IN: State failed to even attempt to justify inventory; reversed

Defendant was arrested with his car on a parking lot for driving on a suspended DL, and the car had a broken windshield and bumper. The state failed to prove justification for an inventory, and it had the burden. Wilford … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on IN: State failed to even attempt to justify inventory; reversed

FL4: State failed to prove inventory policy; def had standing in his own suitcase, albeit not the car

Defendant was neither the owner nor driver of the car he was riding in which had his suitcase in the trunk. He didn’t have standing as to a search of the car, but he did have standing as to the … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on FL4: State failed to prove inventory policy; def had standing in his own suitcase, albeit not the car

D.N.M.: Arrest on warrant in car timed to facilitate pretextual inventory; suppressed

Officers had an arrest warrant for defendant, so they waited until he left his house, stopped him a half mile away and conducted an inventory of his car and had it towed. The court finds the inventory pretextual because it … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Arrest on warrant in car timed to facilitate pretextual inventory; suppressed

IN: State failed to show standard inventory procedures were followed

“Officer Greathouse’s testimony was insufficient to prove the inventory search he performed of Rhodes’ vehicle complied with official police policy. Because the State did not present evidence of police procedure, the search violated Rhodes’ Fourth Amendment protection from unreasonable search … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inventory, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: State failed to show standard inventory procedures were followed

E.D.Cal.: Car could have been left on residential street and not towed and inventoried

Defendant’s car would have been left on a residential street, but the officers impounded it for “caretaking.” The court finds the rationale presented by the officer and her evasive demeanor that the vehicle could have been vandalized or towed by … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Scope of search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Car could have been left on residential street and not towed and inventoried

D.Kan.: Govt failed to prove legal basis for impoundment and inventory

Defendant had standing in his father’s car that he let defendant drive. The inventory of the car and impoundment was not for a legitimate inventory purpose. It was impounded because another police department asked for it. “The government has failed … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Govt failed to prove legal basis for impoundment and inventory

Good faith as a part of inventory searches? In Ohio since at least 1992. Coming to a court near you. Is good faith being subsumed into the “reasonableness” inquiry?

In 2009’s Herring, “good faith” is referred to in the majority opinion seven times as a reason for not applying the exclusionary rule. There it was a search incident to a recalled arrest warrant, a Warrantless search. In Ohio, at … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Inventory | Comments Off on Good faith as a part of inventory searches? In Ohio since at least 1992. Coming to a court near you. Is good faith being subsumed into the “reasonableness” inquiry?

LA4: Protective sweep before def arrested in pajamas reentered to get dressed was reasonable

Defendant was arrested in his pajamas, and it was appropriate for the police to conduct a protective sweep for others before he was permitted to get dressed to leave. A shotgun was validly found propped against the wall in the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inventory, Protective sweep, Seizure, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on LA4: Protective sweep before def arrested in pajamas reentered to get dressed was reasonable

IN: Failure to follow the inventory procedures and stopping the inventory when contraband was found still didn’t make the inventory pretextual

The officer’s failure to follow the inventory procedures and stopping the inventory when contraband was found still didn’t make the inventory pretextual. Whitley v. State, 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 739 (Dec. 7, 2015):

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on IN: Failure to follow the inventory procedures and stopping the inventory when contraband was found still didn’t make the inventory pretextual

OH3: Impoundment of car for SW did not prohibit inventory before SW issued

The impoundment of defendant’s car was reasonable under the circumstances because officers intended to and did get a search warrant for it. The inventory before the search warrant wasn’t prejudicial because nothing from the inventory was even mentioned in the … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH3: Impoundment of car for SW did not prohibit inventory before SW issued

M.D.Fla.: No legal requirement to turn car over to third person rather than impound it

Officers are not required by law to turn a vehicle over to a third person rather than impound it. The impoundment was reasonable. Here, the impoundment decision was based in part on defendant’s claim to the officer that he’d had … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: No legal requirement to turn car over to third person rather than impound it